hey spammers, achtung!!! fnord
wakboth
this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
foil them with typing
fnord
that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
Wakboth
For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
-- Wakboth, the real one.
michael
For what, douchebag?
Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
and ascii character 119?
Augray
wrote in <g0g0m35a8j1k1vcce...@4ax.com> :
Are you suggesting that the fact that the two names differ only in the
capitalization of the first letter is co-incidental?
David Iain Greig
Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
--D.
michael
I never forged any posts.
I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
The reason why, is I AM limited to the
number of posts I can make.
If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
one nym.
Augray
<cabal-slrnfm0n...@darwin.ediacara.org> :
This post may be of historical interest:
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.drugs.psychedelics/msg/01800328e85d6ed5
>--D.
michael
wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
><dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote in
><cabal-slrnfm0n...@darwin.ediacara.org> :
>
>>michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
>>><Wakbo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>>> foil them with typing
>>>>>
>>>>> fnord
>>>>>
>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>>
>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>>>
>>> For what, douchebag?
>>>
>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
>>> and ascii character 119?
>>
>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>
>This post may be of historical interest:
>http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.drugs.psychedelics/msg/01800328e85d6ed5
>
>
>>--D.
Awwww, little rat doesn't want me in this newsgroup.
Try the email yos...@hotmail.com
Go search for some incriminating posts, please.
Augray
wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp7...@4ax.com> :
So, using the nym "wakboth" was just a coincidence?
AC
What precisely am I looking at?
--
Aaron Clausen mightym...@gmail.com
fnor
AC
Ah, now I understand.
Imagine this turkey making accusations against DiG? Why can't he be like a
normal twelve year old and go look up porn.
michael
What you don't know the story?
For real?
I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
AC
I'd like to know whether you think we were all born yesterday? Do you
honestly think we're that stupid.
Quit nym shifting. It's rude, violates netiquette, and if you're newsserver
limits posts, go find one that doesn't, or at least has a higher posting
limit.
michael
First off, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar.
What I said is exactly what happened.
Don't ever call me a liar again.
>
>Quit nym shifting. It's rude, violates netiquette, and if you're newsserver
>limits posts, go find one that doesn't, or at least has a higher posting
>limit.
Number 2, you know what I told you was the truth.
I AM under surveilance, it is posted on the net.
You can all see it.
When this case is over, if you continue to
play this little game of yours, I will personally bring
the DVD of the case over to you and make you
eat it ...
Augray
<slrnfm0q0g.k1m....@rotten.egg.sandwich> :
A post by the same person who started this thread, seemingly aware
that he might get into trouble by posting on t.o.
Now, at the time he probably wasn't referring to the post at the base
of this thread, but it would seem to indicate an awareness that the
DIG might not approve of his activities.
AC
And no one appreciates a nym shifter who steals other peoples nyms.
>
>>
>>Quit nym shifting. It's rude, violates netiquette, and if you're newsserver
>>limits posts, go find one that doesn't, or at least has a higher posting
>>limit.
>
> Number 2, you know what I told you was the truth.
>
> I AM under surveilance, it is posted on the net.
>
> You can all see it.
>
> When this case is over, if you continue to
> play this little game of yours, I will personally bring
> the DVD of the case over to you and make you
> eat it ...
Bluster, paranoia and anger issues. What a delightful mixture.
michael
I didn't steal anyone's nym, asshole.
Augray
wrote in <gvp0m3tn90tl1g0ri...@4ax.com> :
Why would I?
>For real?
For real.
>I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth,
All of ten days ago.
>after
>searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
You though that making the initial letter lowercase would remove any
confusion? You're an idiot.
You first used the name on December 2nd on alt.drugs.psychedelics, and
by the 5th you were aware that someone else had been using the handle
here on talk.origins. Yet the first time you used the name here was
December 8th, and in fact you were aware that there might be problems,
as show in
news:4833b041-1988-443b...@w56g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
>Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
It just shows that you're not particularly interested in avoiding
confusion. In fact, it's obvious that you try to cultivate it.
Ernest Major
<yos...@hotmail.com> writes
You could get yourself a Google Groups account; that allows what should
be a more than a sufficient number of posts per day. If you're still
finding yourself constrained, you could try using one nym consistently
on one group - you seem to be managing that nicely since DIG placed you
on notice.
>>
>>So, using the nym "wakboth" was just a coincidence?
>
>What you don't know the story?
>
>For real?
>
>I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
>searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
You are overly optimistic if you think decapitalising the initial letter
would avoid confusion.
There is also the little matter of the post that you signed "Ernest
Majors". Do you wish to plead incompetence (i.e. a mishandled attempt at
quote-mining)? or have you another explanation to offer?
>
>Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
>
--
alias Ernest Major
Augray
wrote in <mcp0m3lrogij17dog...@4ax.com> :
Where did you get that idea? This group *exists* for idiots like you.
Stick around as long as DIG lets you.
>Try the email yos...@hotmail.com
>
>Go search for some incriminating posts, please.
No need to when there's one at the base of this thread.
Cheezits
[who cares]
What are you, five years old?
<plonk>
Sue
--
"It's not smart or correct, but it's one of the things that
make us what we are." - Red Green
michael
Yeah, I was showing others how evolutionists behave by doing a
copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
michael
wrote:
DIG will be around, as long as *I* allow him ...
Ernest Major
--
alias Ernest Major
Augray
wrote in <eus0m3loh4qfl56sb...@4ax.com> :
...and you're delusional too. Just how are you going to get rid of
him? Focus intense waves of hate in his general direction?
Shane
So to you, the confusion of having one person posting as
michael and wakboth--when there is another person already
posting as Wakboth is less to you than just posting as
michael and Michael?
Please excuse me if I find your explanation far from
convincing.
[...]
michael
I don't give a fuck if you can handle it or not, it
is the truth.
If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
michael
<{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
So you admit you are guilty as charged.
Thanks.
AC
As your message clearly shows, you knew DIG might get pissed at you.
And imagine having the audicity to call what DIG's doing into question. You
clearly have about as much shame as you do honesty.
AC
Do you actually think you can save face?
You are indeed a run-of-the-mill Creationist.
Eat your own DVD.
AC
YOu deserve not only banning, but to be TOSed from your internet service.
Oh, and quit with the bluster. Some of us have been on Usenet a looong time
and no you don't have so much as a molecule of hydrogen to stand on. DIG
owns this newsgroup. That's what moderation means.
michael
Not about this, dickwad.
michael
Did you find this one?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.drugs.psychedelics/msg/fa40d3a0b6e5c505?dmode=source
"An only child alone and wild
A cab'net maker's son
His hands were meant for diff'rent work
And his heart was known to none
He left his home and went his lone and solitary way
And he gave to me a gift
I know I never can repay
A quiet man of music
Denied a simpler fate
He tried to be a soldier once
But his music wouldn't wait
He earned his love thru' discipline
A thund'ring velvet hand
His gentle means of sculpting souls
Took me years to understand
The leader of the band
Is tired and his eyes are growing old
But his blood runs thru' my instrument
And his song is in my soul
My life has been a poor attempt to imitate the man
I'm just a living legacy
To the leader of the band
My brother's lives were diff'rent
For they heard another call
One went to Chicago and the other to St. Paul
And I'm in Colorado
When I'm not in some hotel
Living out this life I've chose
And come to know so well
I thank you for the music
And your stories of the road
I thank you for the freedom
When it came my time to go
I thank you for the kindness
And the times when you got tough
And papa I don't think I said
"I love you" near enough
The leader of the band
Is tired and his eyes are growing old
But his blood runs thru' my instrument
And his song is in my soul
My life has been a poor attempt to imitate the man
I'm just a living legacy
To the leader of the band
I am the living legacy
To the leader of the band
Cory Albrecht
> Yeah, I was showing others how evolutionists behave by doing a
> copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
> demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
> misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
Yeah, that's gonna get you into heaven.
God *must* have put you on this Earth to test a real Christian's
commitment to "love your neighbour as yourself."
michael
Why, because your moderator is biased, dipshit?
There are plenty of ways to access the internet, plenty of ISPs,
and plenty of credit card numbers.
Go fuck yourself you pussy ass chickenshit little bitch snitch ...
Shane
Is it? under what basis do you claim that? You expect us to
accept that you reasoned this out all by yourself, yet the
explanation is so lacking in rationale as to be laughable.
>
> If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
But you already deserve it for nym-shifting. So that
argumant is out the window. You are not really all that good
at this whole newsgroup thing, are you. As for rolling
heads, how many do you have?
Tom McDonald
> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> > this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> > foil them with typing
>
> > fnord
>
> > that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> -- Wakboth, the real one.
Me and a couple of guys will arm up and ride to his cathedral.
michael
6509 sw 22 st
miramar fl 33023
come on by ...
AC
I haven't snitched on anybody, and I'm not the least bit frightened by some
nym-shifting lying twerp who thinks he's a big man because he talks big on a
newsgroup.
I've seen trolls a thousand times cleverer than you. You're just some dumb
fucking punk who is somehow is under the delusion that all this big,
threatening talk means a thing.
DIG is biased against nym-shifting SOBs like you. That's his job you
lightweight little child. You only go to prove that all the good trolls on
Usenet disappeared a long time ago, and all we're left with us stunted
little penis-enviers like you. If I could hold my own against them, then
you're like a speck of turd on the wall of the information superhighway.
You're not going to get DIG into trouble, because a moderated group is
delivered into the moderator's hands. The controversy over this was over a
long time ago, and a late-coming pig-mouthed fart like you who clearly
doesn't even understand Usenet isn't going to change anything.
We're not idiots, you dumbfounded monkey dropping, but clearly you are.
michael
Sorry, I don't have an unlimited acct to make as many posts as I want
or need to like you, cause I ain't a usenet loser like you.
I use several nyms to make my daily posting, end of story.
DIG can get over his hard on for me.
Now, when they sign the order stopping my rights violation,
you won't see me again in here.
BTW, my front door is unlocked and opened, feel free
to stop by, you or anyone ...
Tom McDonald
Oh, dear. The little boy can't recognize a historical reference.
But he is a liar, so maybe he did get it.
Tom McDonald
<snip>
> Sorry, I don't have an unlimited acct to make as many posts as I want
> or need to like you, cause I ain't a usenet loser like you.
No. You are clearly a usenet loser in a class by...
well, there are a bunch of other losenet users like you. You aren't
even a particularly special version of the type.
But please, keep trying. If you work at it, you could gain the top
ranks of the bottom ranks of loserdomishnesskeit.
<snip>
michael
michael
I AM not a liar, asshole.
Glenn
>
How about I copy this little exchange and pop it in the mail?
Will in New Haven
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:02:06 -0500,
>
>
>
> michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
>
> >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:59 -0500, michael <yost...@hotmail.com>
> >>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp78os2k2jcpsc0u7...@4ax.com> :> >>>>michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
> >>>>><Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >>>>>>> foil them with typing
>
> >>>>>>> fnord
>
> >>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>
>
> >>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
> >>>>> and ascii character 119?
>
> >>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>
> >>>>--D.
>
> >>>I never forged any posts.
>
> >>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
> >>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
> >>>number of posts I can make.
>
> >>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
> >>>one nym.
>
> >>So, using the nym "wakboth" was just a coincidence?
>
> > What you don't know the story?
>
> > For real?
>
> > I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
> > searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
> > acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
> > had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
> > of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>
>
> honestly think we're that stupid.
>
> limits posts, go find one that doesn't, or at least has a higher posting
> limit.
I hate nymshifting but he HAS been using that nym in many newsgroups
for a long time. None of his posts under it were any better than his
other garbage but his "explanation" may well be valid.
Will in New Haven
--
I believe in a higher power; squared is a higher power.
>
> --
> Aaron Clausen mightymartia...@gmail.com
>
> fnor
Will in New Haven
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:36 +0000, Ernest Major
>
>
>
> >In message <gvp0m3tn90tl1g0rieogap2ca5el48b...@4ax.com>, michael
> ><yost...@hotmail.com> writes> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:59 -0500, michael <yost...@hotmail.com>
> >>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp78os2k2jcpsc0u7...@4ax.com> :
>
> >>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> >>>><dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
Is there some help I could give you so that you could die with
dignity, soon?
It is painful to watch you and be unable to make your life any worse
or shorter.
While your story about Wakboth, wakboth might be valid, your forgery
of someone else's precise name doesn't qualify as satire or parody or
anything but fraud.
David Iain Greig
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp7...@4ax.com> :
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
>>>>><Wakbo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fnord
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>>>>>
>>>>> For what, douchebag?
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>>>>
>>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>>>>
>>>>--D.
>>>
>>>I never forged any posts.
>>>
>>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
>>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
>>>number of posts I can make.
>>>
>>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
>>>one nym.
>>
>
> What you don't know the story?
>
> For real?
>
> I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
> searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
> acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
> had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
> of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
Oh, hah, I only banned the other nym.
> Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
Nah, but you only get one nym, so the others are b&
Your shitty news service doesn't get you a pass on following
the rules here. Either live with one nym, or get
a better newsfeed.
It's that simple.
--D.
michael
It's not fraud retard.
What about you posting under john harshman and will in new
haven, and probably a few others, charlatan?
michael
<dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
Oh pharoah, oh please, tell me which nym you are
so graciously going to allow me to have and keep?
Oh please tell me, I AM so glad you have condescended
down to my level and deem to reveal your most
excellent and righteous decisions for all to see
and admire and respect, most enlightened masterful one ...
Shane
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:36 +0000, Ernest Major
> <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In message <gvp0m3tn90tl1g0ri...@4ax.com>, michael
>><yos...@hotmail.com> writes
[...]
>>You are overly optimistic if you think decapitalising the initial letter
>>would avoid confusion.
>>
>>There is also the little matter of the post that you signed "Ernest
>>Majors". Do you wish to plead incompetence (i.e. a mishandled attempt at
>>quote-mining)? or have you another explanation to offer?
>>>
>>>Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
>>>
>
> Yeah, I was showing others how evolutionists behave by doing a
> copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
> demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
> misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
But we are only emulating some of the creationist posters
here on t.o. on the odd occasions we act as you describe. So
where does that leave you argument?
Shane
> BTW, my front door is unlocked and opened, feel free
> to stop by, you or anyone ...
Can't get laid by the conventioanl means, hey?
David Iain Greig
> copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
> demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
> misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
You know, when you curse like that, you sound rather.... Swedish.
--D.
David Iain Greig
Glenn, you really are a mensch sometimes, you know? :)
--D.
Shane
But how do we know that you are not lying when you post
that?
Also, FYI, in newsgroup posts rather than putting your sig
in line after an apostrophe as you have done above, it is
normally configured like this
-- (note there is a space after the 2nd minus sign)
Sig.
HTH.
killerlimpet
Tom McDonald
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:43:43 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
>
>
>
> >On Dec 12, 8:26 pm, michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
>
> >> <kilt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Dec 12, 12:43 pm, Wakboth <Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> > If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >> >> > this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >> >> > foil them with typing
>
> >> >> > fnord
>
> >> >> > that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >> >> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >> >> -- Wakboth, the real one.
>
> >> >Me and a couple of guys will arm up and ride to his cathedral.
>
> >> 6509 sw 22 st
>
> >> miramar fl 33023
>
> >> come on by ...
>
> >Oh, dear. The little boy can't recognize a historical reference.
>
> >But he is a liar, so maybe he did get it.
>
> I AM not a liar, asshole.
But you are an asshole, liar.
Tom McDonald
Should Josh make the popcorn now? :-)
michael
I hope you enjoy the rest of your short miserable existence ...
Tom McDonald
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:07:10 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
>
>
>
Thanks. You too.
michael
Sorry dumbass, I AM going to live a long life and always
be known for my honesty; whilst, 5 years from now, no
one will remember you at all ...
David Iain Greig
I think you need to make it clear, quickly, that you are in
no way uttering a threat here.
--D.
--
david iain greig dgr...@ediacara.org
moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~dgreig arbor plena alouattarum
Glenn
sometimes though.
michael
here you are again being fucking stupid.
I believe this person is old age.
I believe within 5 years, natural causes will do
him in.
Is his old age and death from natural causes a threat?
I don't threaten people.
So if you ever get some bug up your fat ass and
decide that somehow I AM threatening someone,
stop right there, and think again, instead of what you
want to read into it fucktard.
Shane
Methinks someone is angling for a banning, which would
certainly solve the problem you have of not being able to
respond to substantive arguments with anything but bluster
and empty assertion.
I for one hope you are not banned, creationsits like you are
worth having around as they demonstrate so convincingly the
emptiness of the creationist position.
michael
I AM trying to get past this blatant ridiculous nazi
censorship dictatorship and trying to bring it to a head,
so I can continue with my tactic to prove evolution is the
lying fraud brainwashing cult it is.
>
>I for one hope you are not banned, creationsits like you are
>worth having around as they demonstrate so convincingly the
>emptiness of the creationist position.
I have made so much headway, not only in here,
but in the courts and our education system, it isn't even funny ...
AC
> On 13 Dec 2007 02:32:37 GMT, AC <mightym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:19:40 -0500,
>>michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 13 Dec 2007 02:09:01 GMT, AC <mightym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:42:46 -0500,
>>>>michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:25:02 +1000, Shane
>>>>><remarcs...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:02:06 -0500, michael wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:59 -0500, michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp7...@4ax.com> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fnord
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
>>>>>>>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>--D.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I never forged any posts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
>>>>>>>>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
>>>>>>>>>number of posts I can make.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
>>>>>>>>>one nym.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So, using the nym "wakboth" was just a coincidence?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What you don't know the story?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For real?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
>>>>>>> searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>>>>>>> acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>>>>>>> had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>>>>>>> of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>michael and wakboth--when there is another person already
>>>>>>posting as Wakboth is less to you than just posting as
>>>>>>michael and Michael?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Please excuse me if I find your explanation far from
>>>>>>convincing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[...]
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't give a fuck if you can handle it or not, it
>>>>> is the truth.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
>>>>
>>>>YOu deserve not only banning, but to be TOSed from your internet service.
>>>
>>> Why, because your moderator is biased, dipshit?
>>>
>>> There are plenty of ways to access the internet, plenty of ISPs,
>>> and plenty of credit card numbers.
>>>
>>> Go fuck yourself you pussy ass chickenshit little bitch snitch ...
>>
>>I haven't snitched on anybody, and I'm not the least bit frightened by some
>>nym-shifting lying twerp who thinks he's a big man because he talks big on a
>>newsgroup.
>>
>>I've seen trolls a thousand times cleverer than you. You're just some dumb
>>fucking punk who is somehow is under the delusion that all this big,
>>threatening talk means a thing.
>>
>>DIG is biased against nym-shifting SOBs like you. That's his job you
>>lightweight little child. You only go to prove that all the good trolls on
>>Usenet disappeared a long time ago, and all we're left with us stunted
>>little penis-enviers like you. If I could hold my own against them, then
>>you're like a speck of turd on the wall of the information superhighway.
>>You're not going to get DIG into trouble, because a moderated group is
>>delivered into the moderator's hands. The controversy over this was over a
>>long time ago, and a late-coming pig-mouthed fart like you who clearly
>>doesn't even understand Usenet isn't going to change anything.
>>
>>We're not idiots, you dumbfounded monkey dropping, but clearly you are.
>
> Sorry, I don't have an unlimited acct to make as many posts as I want
> or need to like you, cause I ain't a usenet loser like you.
>
>
> DIG can get over his hard on for me.
Or he can ban you for nym-shifting. It's his newsgroup.
>
> Now, when they sign the order stopping my rights violation,
> you won't see me again in here.
>
> BTW, my front door is unlocked and opened, feel free
> to stop by, you or anyone ...
If the address you provided is real, I live several thousand miles away. I
can't imagine spending thousands of dollars to head to Florida to visit you.
--
Aaron Clausen mightym...@gmail.com
fnor
AC
All you're proving is that you're an abusive troll. I doubt you really know
anything about evolution, which is why you're going on this tact.
>
>>
>>I for one hope you are not banned, creationsits like you are
>>worth having around as they demonstrate so convincingly the
>>emptiness of the creationist position.
>
> I have made so much headway, not only in here,
> but in the courts and our education system, it isn't even funny ...
YOu came to the wrong place if you think you can actually convince us of
that kind of crap.
AC
Ah yes, the Uncle Davey defense "I'm a dishonest man, but my biggest critics
must certainly be as well, so it makes it okay."
SeppoP
> On 13 Dec 2007 02:04:43 GMT, AC <mightym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:30:32 -0500,
>> michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 Dec 2007 23:25:30 GMT, AC <mightym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:20:21 -0500,
>>>> michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 12 Dec 2007 23:06:43 GMT, AC <mightym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:02:06 -0500,
>>>>>> michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp7...@4ax.com> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
>>>>>>>>> <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
>>>>>>>>>>> <Wakbo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fnord
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Wakboth, the real one.
>>>>>>>>>>> For what, douchebag?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
>>>>>>>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>>>>>>>>>> Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --D.
>>>>>>>>> I never forged any posts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
>>>>>>>>> The reason why, is I AM limited to the
>>>>>>>>> number of posts I can make.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
>>>>>>>>> one nym.
>>>>>>> What you don't know the story?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For real?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
>>>>>>> searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>>>>>>> acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>>>>>>> had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>>>>>>> of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> honestly think we're that stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I said is exactly what happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't ever call me a liar again.
>>>> And no one appreciates a nym shifter who steals other peoples nyms.
>>> I didn't steal anyone's nym, asshole.
>> As your message clearly shows, you knew DIG might get pissed at you.
>
> Not about this, dickwad.
>
>> And imagine having the audicity to call what DIG's doing into question. You
>> clearly have about as much shame as you do honesty.
>
Fuckface, you were *told* several times not to forgepost, you *still* continued to do that.
You deserve what you get, no lying from you will change that.
--
Seppo P.
What's wrong with Theocracy? (a Finnish Taliban, Oct 1, 2005)
Ernest Major
<yos...@hotmail.com> writes
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:13:35 +0000, Ernest Major
><{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In message <mos0m3tkqsk6q03k6...@4ax.com>, michael
>><yos...@hotmail.com> writes
>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:36 +0000, Ernest Major
>>>
>>>>In message <gvp0m3tn90tl1g0ri...@4ax.com>, michael
>>>><yos...@hotmail.com> writes
>>>>be a more than a sufficient number of posts per day. If you're still
>>>>finding yourself constrained, you could try using one nym consistently
>>>>on one group - you seem to be managing that nicely since DIG placed you
>>>>on notice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What you don't know the story?
>>>>>
>>>>>For real?
>>>>>
>>>>>I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
>>>>>searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>>>>>acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>>>>>had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>>>>>of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>>>>
>>>>would avoid confusion.
>>>>
>>>>There is also the little matter of the post that you signed "Ernest
>>>>Majors". Do you wish to plead incompetence (i.e. a mishandled attempt at
>>>>quote-mining)? or have you another explanation to offer?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
>>>demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
>>>misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
>>>
>
>So you admit you are guilty as charged.
>
>Thanks.
>
Incorrect. You took a post of mine that was correct in context
(backspace displays pragmatic incompetence, feigned or real), threw away
half of it, and placed it in a context where it was inappropriate. (If
you are unable to distinguish between the contexts you are also
pragmatically incompetent.)
By the way, describing someone as pragmatically incompetent is not a
claim that the person is misbehaving but a claim that the person is
incompetent. And you demonstrated that at least one creationist
(yourself) is among the ones misbehaving.
--
alias Ernest Major
Ernest Major
<yos...@hotmail.com> writes
>My life has been a poor attempt to imitate the man
I suggest you try harder.
--
alias Ernest Major
Ernest Major
<yos...@hotmail.com> writes
--
alias Ernest Major
Ernest Major
<yos...@hotmail.com> writes
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:25:02 +1000, Shane
>
>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:02:06 -0500, michael wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp7...@4ax.com> :
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
>>>>><dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
>>>>>>><Wakbo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fnord
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For what, douchebag?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
>>>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--D.
>>>>>
>>>>>I never forged any posts.
>>>>>
>>>>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
>>>>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
>>>>>number of posts I can make.
>>>>>
>>>>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
>>>>>one nym.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What you don't know the story?
>>>
>>> For real?
>>>
>>> I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
>>> searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
>>> acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
>>> had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
>>> of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>>
>>michael and wakboth--when there is another person already
>>posting as Wakboth is less to you than just posting as
>>michael and Michael?
>>
>>Please excuse me if I find your explanation far from
>>convincing.
>>
>>[...]
>
>I don't give a fuck if you can handle it or not, it
>is the truth.
>
>If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
>
--
alias Ernest Major
Matchstick
@hotmail.com says...
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:45:55 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:50:38 -0500, michael <yos...@hotmail.com>
> >wrote in <mcp0m3lrogij17dog...@4ax.com> :
> >
> >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:44:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> >>><cabal-slrnfm0n...@darwin.ediacara.org> :
> >>>
> >>>>michael <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
> >>>>><Wakbo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >>>>>>> foil them with typing
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> fnord
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For what, douchebag?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
> >>>>> and ascii character 119?
> >>>>
> >>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
> >>>
> >>>http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.drugs.psychedelics/msg/01800328e85d6ed5
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>--D.
> >>Awwww, little rat doesn't want me in this newsgroup.
> >
> >Where did you get that idea? This group *exists* for idiots like you.
> >Stick around as long as DIG lets you.
>
> DIG will be around, as long as *I* allow him ...
Is that a threat ?
I hope you say yes, it would be the funniest thing I've seen on usenet
in years.
--
Contact Address matchstick a t oofg d o t com
"The wages of sin are death... but the hours are good and the perks are
fantastic."
michael
A threat to remove him as moderator, sure.
I don't threaten people, for the last time, with violence ...
Matchstick
@hotmail.com says...
> A threat to remove him as moderator, sure.
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehheheheh-
ahem
Oh, this should be good.
So how *exactly* are you going to do that ?
SeppoP
And you plan to do that exactly how? :) :) :)
> I don't threaten people, for the last time, with violence ...
>
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <slrnfm1mkg.k1m....@rotten.egg.sandwich>):
Where in Florida is he?
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <h862m3h8moa86d45c...@4ax.com>):
This should be good...
<gets out popcorn, cranks up Warren Zevon collection in iTunes, ooh, you're
just an excitable boy...>
>
> I don't threaten people,
liar
> for the last time, with violence ...
Bullshit.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <MPG.21cb2d67b...@news.supernews.com>):
> In article <h862m3h8moa86d45c...@4ax.com>, yost536
> @hotmail.com says...
>> A threat to remove him as moderator, sure.
>
>
> Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehhehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehheheheh-
> ahem
> Oh, this should be good.
>
> So how *exactly* are you going to do that ?
>
>
He's gonna hold his breath 'til he turns blue.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article <l261m39rql1nc5bv2...@4ax.com>):
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
> <kil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 12, 12:43 pm, Wakboth <Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
>>>> foil them with typing
>>>
>>>> fnord
>>>
>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>>>
>>> -- Wakboth, the real one.
>>
>> Me and a couple of guys will arm up and ride to his cathedral.
>
> 6509 sw 22 st
>
> miramar fl 33023
>
> come on by ...
>
Interesting. <prints out invitation>
Now, what's your real name, just for the record? For those who don't live in
Florida, note that he's in Broward County, and Florida has a Public Records
Law, so that items such as the names of those who hold title to land are
publicly available at the County Clerk's office, or on the web at
<http://www.broward.org/records/cri03300.htm>. It should be simple enough to
find out if he really does live at that address, or if he's lying. Again.
Will in New Haven
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:11:42 -0800 (PST), Will in New Haven
>
>
>
>
>
> <bill.re...@taylorandfrancis.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 12, 6:48 pm, michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:36 +0000, Ernest Major
>
> >> <{$t...@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >In message <gvp0m3tn90tl1g0rieogap2ca5el48b...@4ax.com>, michael
> >> ><yost...@hotmail.com> writes
> >> >>wrote:
>
> >> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:59 -0500, michael <yost...@hotmail.com>
> >> >>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp78os2k2jcpsc0u7...@4ax.com> :
>
> >> >>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
>
> >> >>>>>michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
> >> >>>>>><Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >> >>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >> >>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>
> >> >>>>>>>> fnord
>
> >> >>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >> >>>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >> >>>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>
>
> >> >>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
> >> >>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>
> >> >>>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>
>
> >> >>>>I never forged any posts.
>
> >> >>>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
> >> >>>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
> >> >>>>number of posts I can make.
>
> >> >>>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
> >> >>>>one nym.
>
> >> >be a more than a sufficient number of posts per day. If you're still
> >> >finding yourself constrained, you could try using one nym consistently
> >> >on one group - you seem to be managing that nicely since DIG placed you
> >> >on notice.
>
>
> >> >>What you don't know the story?
>
> >> >>For real?
>
> >> >>I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
> >> >>searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
> >> >>acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
> >> >>had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
> >> >>of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>
> >> >would avoid confusion.
>
> >> >There is also the little matter of the post that you signed "Ernest
> >> >Majors". Do you wish to plead incompetence (i.e. a mishandled attempt at
> >> >quote-mining)? or have you another explanation to offer?
>
> >> >>Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
>
> >> Yeah, I was showing others how evolutionists behave by doing a
> >> copy or parody of your behavior in your posts to someone else, thus
> >> demonstrating your hypocrisy in claiming the creationists are the ones
> >> misbehaving, you dumbfucking moronic puke faced bitch!
>
> >Is there some help I could give you so that you could die with
> >dignity, soon?
>
> >It is painful to watch you and be unable to make your life any worse
> >or shorter.
>
> >While your story about Wakboth, wakboth might be valid, your forgery
> >of someone else's precise name doesn't qualify as satire or parody or
> >anything but fraud.
>
> >Will in New Haven
>
> It's not fraud retard.
>
> What about you posting under john harshman and will in new
> haven, and probably a few others, charlatan?
You're a delusiional baby. If I could come up with posts as wise and
witty as John's, I would certainly keep them under my own name. And
"It's not fraud, retard," (corrected your punctuation for free there)
is not a refutation of a charge of fraud, you lying sack of shit.
Will in New Haven
--
I believe in a higher power; squared is a higher power.
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Will in New Haven
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:38:58 +1000, Shane
>
>
>
>
>
> <remarcsdNOS...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:31:27 -0500, michael wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:34:49 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> >> <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
> >>>michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:21:27 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
Oh, but it is funny. Or, really, YOU are funny. If it weren't for that
no one would read you at all. Oh, wishing you were dead is kinda fun
but not fun enough to keep me reading. But the hilarity of your very
existance, the fact that you take you seriously; these brighten my
day.
Will in New Haven
--
I believe in a higher power; squared is a higher power.
...- Hide quoted text -
SeppoP
Shhh. Don't be so loud about it. 'michael' might notice that in reality there are *only four* _real_
people on this n.g.: me, michael, you and John Harshman. *Everyone* else is a sockpuppet belonging these four.
This is probably one of the best kept secrets of T.O.
chris thompson
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
>
>
>
> <kilt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >> > this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >> > foil them with typing
>
> >> > fnord
>
> >> > that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >> -- Wakboth, the real one.
>
>
> 6509 sw 22 st
>
> miramar fl 33023
>
> come on by ...
Is your trailer the one with the '64 Falcon on the cinderblocks?
Chris
Chris Krolczyk
> If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
I'm quivering in my boots at the thought of your collection
of GI Joe action figures steeling themselves for the initial
assault.
-Chris Krolczyk
Chris Krolczyk
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:51:04 -0500, michael <yost...@hotmail.com>
> >DIG will be around, as long as *I* allow him ...
>
> ...and you're delusional too. Just how are you going to get rid of
> him? Focus intense waves of hate in his general direction?
I suspect he's trying to drown him in gallons of incredibly
soggy, fiber-deficient bullshit instead.
-Chris Krolczyk
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<449fea42-ad27-49e4...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):
> On Dec 12, 7:42 pm, michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If I get banned when not deserving of it, heads will roll ...
I gotta see this.
>
> I'm quivering in my boots at the thought of your collection
> of GI Joe action figures steeling themselves for the initial
> assault.
He's just an excitable boy.
Inez
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:58:39 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
>
>
>
>
>
> <dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
> >michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:55:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:42:59 -0500, michael <yost...@hotmail.com>
> >>>wrote in <hto0m3t0i7tm6lmp78os2k2jcpsc0u7...@4ax.com> :
>
> >>>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> >>>><dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>>michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>><Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >>>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >>>>>>>> foil them with typing
>
> >>>>>>>> fnord
>
> >>>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >>>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >>>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>
>
> >>>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
> >>>>>> and ascii character 119?
>
> >>>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>
> >>>>>--D.
>
> >>>>I never forged any posts.
>
> >>>>I nymshift, but never deny it is I.
> >>>>The reason why, is I AM limited to the
> >>>>number of posts I can make.
>
> >>>>If I had an unlimited usenet acct, I would use
> >>>>one nym.
>
>
> >> What you don't know the story?
>
> >> For real?
>
> >> I called someone in another newsgroup wakboth, after
> >> searching it out on google, found a link to a mit explanation, and
> >> acquired the nym there; unbeknownst to me, someone here
> >> had a similar nym, so I lowered the capital letter at the beginning
> >> of the nym, so there wouldn't be any confusion.
>
>
> >> Why, is that explanation important to someone here?
>
>
> >Your shitty news service doesn't get you a pass on following
> >the rules here. Either live with one nym, or get
> >a better newsfeed.
>
> >It's that simple.
>
> >--D.
>
> Oh pharoah, oh please, tell me which nym you are
> so graciously going to allow me to have and keep?
>
> Oh please tell me, I AM so glad you have condescended
> down to my level and deem to reveal your most
> excellent and righteous decisions for all to see
> and admire and respect, most enlightened masterful one ...
One can't help but note that if you'd not started this childish thread
in the first place, you could have saved yourself quite a few posts
against your apparently restrictive post limit. One also can't help
but wonder why you're calling on spammers to wreck a group that you're
so keen to post to that you need many nyms to extend your posting
limit.
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<d6602818-2c3e-4ab0...@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>):
Miramar's _north_ of Dade. Much higher class. He'll have at least a '73
Buick. Maybe even a '77 LTD.
chris thompson
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:54:45 -0500, chris thompson wrote
> (in article
>
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 9:26 pm, michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:21:52 -0800 (PST), Tom McDonald
>
> >> <kilt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Dec 12, 12:43 pm, Wakboth <Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >>>>> foil them with typing
>
> >>>>> fnord
>
> >>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >>>> For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >>>> -- Wakboth, the real one.
>
> >>> Me and a couple of guys will arm up and ride to his cathedral.
>
> >> 6509 sw 22 st
>
> >> miramar fl 33023
>
> >> come on by ...
>
> > Is your trailer the one with the '64 Falcon on the cinderblocks?
>
> Miramar's _north_ of Dade. Much higher class. He'll have at least a '73
> Buick. Maybe even a '77 LTD.
Ah my mistake. You're telling me his trailer might even have a screen
door.
Chris
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<6f83aa83-0cac-4852...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):
It's not _that_ far north of Dade. Screen doors start in Pembroke Pines, the
next 'city' north.
Gregory A Greenman
<yos...@hotmail.com> declared...
>
> I have made so much headway, not only in here,
But, is it even wrong?
--
Greg
----
http://www.spencerbooksellers.com
greg00 -at- spencersoft -dot- com
chris thompson
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:30:51 -0500, chris thompson wrote
> (in article
A screen door scavenged from Pembroke Pines? With rips?
Chris
J.J. O'Shea
(in article
<613284dc-84ea-43ed...@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):
That might work...
AC
Please detail precisely how you plan on removing him as moderator. All the
steps, please. I just want to see if you even have the vaguest idea how
Usenet works.
--
Aaron Clausen mightym...@gmail.com
fnor
Glenn
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:10:16 -0000, Matchstick
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <eus0m3loh4qfl56sb0un7tf46r9sjlk...@4ax.com>, yost536
> >@hotmail.com says...
> >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:45:55 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >wrote in <mcp0m3lrogij17dogt7l7vg138v17tc...@4ax.com> :
>
> >> >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:44:26 -0500, Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
> >> >>wrote:
>
> >> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:25:06 +0000 (UTC), David Iain Greig
> >> >>><dgr...@ediacara.org> wrote in
>
> >> >>>>michael <yost...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:43:05 -0800 (PST), Wakboth
> >> >>>>><Wakboth2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>>>>>On 12 joulu, 17:39, wakboth <wakboth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> If you decide to skip hacking and anonymous proxies to destroy
> >> >>>>>>> this moderated heap of crap called talk.origins,
> >> >>>>>>> foil them with typing
>
> >> >>>>>>> fnord
>
> >> >>>>>>> that is the code key!!!!!!!!!
>
> >> >>>>>>For DIG's sake, can someone ban this bothersome troll?
>
> >> >>>>>>-- Wakboth, the real one.
>
> >> >>>>> For what, douchebag?
>
> >> >>>>> Don't you know the difference between ascii character 87
> >> >>>>> and ascii character 119?
>
> >> >>>>Immaterial. User is banned for nymshifting and forgeposting.
>
> >> >>>This post may be of historical interest:
>
> >> >>>>--D.
> >> >>Awwww, little rat doesn't want me in this newsgroup.
>
> >> >Where did you get that idea? This group *exists* for idiots like you.
> >> >Stick around as long as DIG lets you.
>
> >> DIG will be around, as long as *I* allow him ...
>
> >Is that a threat ?
>
> >I hope you say yes, it would be the funniest thing I've seen on usenet
> >in years.
>
> A threat to remove him as moderator, sure.
>
> I don't threaten people, for the last time, with violence ...
>
Your threats made recently in this thread indeed do not explicitly
include "violence", but they *are* veiled threats of violence.
Your reasons for these threats; "I believe he will only live another
five years" and "I can remove him as moderator" are themselves
sufficient to determine that you are imbalanced and so inclined in
taking action to harming others. *YOU* might consider this fact when
considering whether anyone should believe your OTHER claim that you
aren't threatening people with physical harm.
Veiled threats such as these are increasingly being seen as important
markers in determining the likelihood of a drugged out twit like you
actually doing something bad, to act out their inclinations. Just
making another idiotic claim like "I don't threaten people with
violence" isn't convincing in the least. You must *show* by your
attitude and behavior here that you aren't. And you aren't. Your new
post from another nym last night continues to show that you have
serious mental and emotional problems.
Wakboth
And you three (we three?) are all Howard Hersehey, if I recall
correctly.
-- Wakboth
Dr. Evil
Wrong.
I explained both of those, since you people appear
paranoid.
One is the person is old, and will likely die of natural causes
in five years. The other was removing someone as moderator,
not physically hurting them, dipshit.
Let's take a reality check here.
Who in here can claim that I physically harmed them?
Can you produce even one?
No, you know why?
Because, not only do I not threaten people, I don't
hurt people physically.
I AM living in reality, you are living like a scared paranoid pussy
in delusion.
Up your meds ...
fnord
>*YOU* might consider this fact when
> considering whether anyone should believe your OTHER claim that you
> aren't threatening people with physical harm.
> Veiled threats such as these are increasingly being seen as important
> markers in determining the likelihood of a drugged out twit like you
> actually doing something bad, to act out their inclinations. Just
> making another idiotic claim like "I don't threaten people with
> violence" isn't convincing in the least. You must *show* by your
> attitude and behavior here that you aren't. And you aren't. Your new
> post from another nym last night continues to show that you have
> serious mental and emotional problems.- Hide quoted text -