Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Seahrose in Lake Titicaca

612 views
Skip to first unread message

peter...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 1:04:00 PM11/3/13
to
Sometimes creationists cliams that the Seahorses(which normaly live in saltwater) and other fishes up in lakes in the mountains are proof of the biblical flood.

I havent found anything about this on talkorgins archieve and wounder whats the explanation of this.





Richard Norman

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 1:41:37 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST), peter...@gmail.com wrote:

>Sometimes creationists cliams that the Seahorses(which normaly live in saltwater) and other fishes up in lakes in the mountains are proof of the biblical flood.
>
>I havent found anything about this on talkorgins archieve and wounder whats the explanation of this.
>

Do you have a reliable source for a seahorse that lives in Lake
Titicaca? I don't mean a dried specimen that could have come from the
ocean or a fossil.

jillery

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 2:23:02 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST), peter...@gmail.com wrote:

>Sometimes creationists cliams that the Seahorses(which normaly live in saltwater) and other fishes up in lakes in the mountains are proof of the biblical flood.
>
>I havent found anything about this on talkorgins archieve and wounder whats the explanation of this.


Different species. Here's what some of them look like:

<http://hippocampus-info.com/seahorses/freshwater.html>

IIUC there used to be a native pipefish in Lake Titicaca, but
introduced game fish ate them all.

Richard Norman

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 2:59:29 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:23:02 -0500, jillery <69jp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Are there any reliable reports of pipefish in Lake Titicaca? Was your
understanding based perhaps on an anecdotal source rather than hard
evidence?

peter...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 4:15:00 PM11/3/13
to

Richard Norman

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 4:35:23 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 13:15:00 -0800 (PST), peter...@gmail.com wrote:

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ajmCCa7JZY

I repeat my question: Do you have a reliable source for a seahorse

James Beck

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 4:36:20 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST), peter...@gmail.com wrote:

>Sometimes creationists cliams that the Seahorses(which normaly live in saltwater) and other fishes up in lakes in the mountains are proof of the biblical flood.
>
>I havent found anything about this on talkorgins archieve and wounder whats the explanation of this.


How about something like this: The Andes are being formed by the
subduction of the Nazca plate beneath the South American plate. They
are an upthrusting of sedimentary and metamorphic rock. That is, the
pull-apart basin where Lake Titicaca currently sits was once sea
bottom.

Lake Titicaca is fed by several major rivers and dozens of freshwater
tributaries. Over time its seahorses adapted to survive in fresh, cold
water.

Roger Shrubber

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 5:08:30 PM11/3/13
to
Uriel's Machine, Knight & Lomas p124. 1999 is the main
proponent of seahorses in Lake Titicaca. The book is
in league with "Chariots of the Gods". The source of
the seahorse story is Arthur Posnansky. It is speculated
that he was shown dried seahorses and was fooled.

Because of the remarkable claim that it is, numerous
surveys of the lake have attempted to find seahorses.
The complete lack of living or recently living specimens
to support the claims of freshwater seahorses is not
due to a lack of looking.




Richard Norman

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 5:27:12 PM11/3/13
to
I found pretty much the same thing, including the total absence of
seahorses in listings of the fish there from technical sources.

Inyo

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 6:17:40 PM11/3/13
to
"Richard Norman" <r_s_n...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:p46d791muve868f15...@4ax.com...

> Do you have a reliable source for a seahorse that lives in Lake
> Titicaca? I don't mean a dried specimen that could have come from the
> ocean or a fossil.

I know nothing about possible seahorses in Lake Titicaca (good for them if
they can survive there is pretty much my conclusion), but I can tell you
about a most curious coprolitic coincidence, indeed, involving the famed
South American body of water.

The plot thickens: There's a geologic rock formation on California's Mojave
Desert called the Barstow Formation. It's roughly 19 to 13 million years
old, dated pretty accurately through rigorous sophisticated radiometric
isotope calculations conducted on several inlayered accumulations of tuff
(hardened volcanic ash-sludge).

The Barstow Formation yields loads of fossils--lots of extinct, now
mineralized mammalian skeletal elements, for example. It also contains
abundant silicified insects, arachnids, and crustaceans that can be freed
whole and intact, in fully three-dimensional form, from calcareous
concretions that occur rather commonly in specific phases of sedimentary
deposition some 17 million years old.

One particular obvious evidence of arthropod activity approximately 17
million years ago, recovered from the insoluble residues of Barstow
Formation concretions run through a diluted solution of either formic,
acetic, or muriatic (commercial-grade hydrochloric) acids, includes abundant
excellently preserved coprolites from a species of fairy shrimp whose
closest living relative now inhabits the Lake Titicaca area.

Mojave Desert fairy shrimp coprolites coincidentally in common with current
crustacean defecations at Lake Titicaca (with scatatological emphasis on the
"caca" part, naturally)? You just can't make this stuff (crap?) up.

More information regarding the overall paleontology and general geology of
the middle Miocene Barstow Formation can be found at my page--"Fossil
Insects And Vertebrates On The Mojave Desert, California"
http://inyo.coffeecup.com/site/barstowfossils/barstowfossils.html .


jillery

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 6:42:05 PM11/3/13
to
I can find no authoritive references to pipefish or seahorses in or
around Lake Titicaca.

Dale

unread,
Nov 3, 2013, 10:24:42 PM11/3/13
to
On 11/03/2013 01:04 PM, peter...@gmail.com wrote:
> Sometimes creationists cliams that the Seahorses(which normaly live in saltwater) and other fishes up in lakes in the mountains are proof of the biblical flood.
>
> I havent found anything about this on talkorgins archieve and wounder whats the explanation of this.
>
>
>
>
>

Cornholio is from Lake Titicaca maybe this proves something
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornholio#Cornholio

--
Dale

Richard Norman

unread,
Nov 5, 2013, 9:59:59 AM11/5/13
to
The site (geologic as well as internet) looks fascinating. But, I
wonder, what special feature is there of fairy shrimp feces that makes
for readily identifiable coprolites? I never heard in all the ads for
"sea monkeys" any mention of the special amount or quality of
excrement they produce. Or is it that they tend to be so numerous
that any accumulation of particles is more than likely fairy shrimp
poop?

Mike Dworetsky

unread,
Nov 8, 2013, 9:36:24 AM11/8/13
to
At least we won't see the creationists trying to teach this in classrooms.
Can you imagine the uproar when parents find out they are talking to
impressionable kids about titty and ca-ca?

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)

0 new messages