Knock knock Glenn, do you think that it is strange that he cites
McClintock and doesn't understand that we have known that transposons
can alter gene expression since they were discovered? How do you think
that McClintock tracked their movements? They were first thought to be
regulatory elements or possible means to regulate genes, but when we
learned more about them we found out that they were DNA parasites, and
their gene regulatory behavior was just due to their containing
regulatory sequences so that they could replicate more of themselves and
they ended up regulating genes that they inserted into or by to some
extent. Most of the time it didn't do much of anything, sometimes they
do something bad enough to notice, and a few times they do something
interesting that might get selected for. They are just part of the
normal arbitrary mutations that occur in the genome. Look up the papers
on ALU retrotransposon that makes up 10% of our genome. Most of what
they have found that it does, if it does much of anything but waste
cellular resources by existing, is associated with genetic diseases.
Demonstrate that you want your designer to be responsible for
transposons. Go for it. Really, Glenn, genes are regualted in such a
way as to get everything to work, but when a transposon jumps into a new
place and messes up the existing gene regulation, what do you think that
does? Most of the time it changes gene regulation it turns out bad
because things are already working. Think about it. You are just lucky
that 40% of the genome is composed of transposon sequences, and just by
chance when transposon jumps to a new place it would fall into an
existing transposon sequence 40% of the time. Most of the transposon
sequences in your genome are defective only a small percentage of them
can still jump around. Once they mutate and become defective they get
stuck in place and just degenerate to random sequence over hundreds of
million of years.
Ron Okimoto