Structure of the theory of natural selection

[mohammad...@gmail.com]

Natural selection theory should be reformulated as reproductive selection.

It is because the term "natural", in "natural selection", is too vague for science.

Logic says that the product of natural selection would be "natural" organisms. But what is it specifically about an organism that is "natural"? It is a vague term that does not correspond with anything objective.

Reproductive selection on the other hand, asserts that organisms are formed towards contributing to reproduction. Reproduction, unlike "natural", is a real demonstrable thing.

The definition "differential reproductive success", gets rid of the meaningless term natural, but that definition is also wrong.

First, there is no demonstrable success anywhere in nature, that is a subjective term.

Second, to have variants with differing rates of reproduction is happenstance, and not a fundamental mechanism.

Reproduction is the fundamental mechanism, the real thing.

Then there may be a happenstance of competing against a variant in the population.

There may also be a happenstance of variants going their separate ways in different environments.

Dr. Kleiman showed that when doing mathematics of mutation and selection, these fundamental differences in definition do actually matter a lot.

The mathematics of a variant sweeping to fixation in a population, are sometimes irrellevant. Like for instance in extinction scenario's, like with infectious diseases.

In such extinction scenario's, the mathematics of the more fundamental reproductive selection + mutation, then provides the correct answer to questions about how to make a disease population of bacteria, go extinct. How to minimize the chance of resistance to medication arising.

Dr. Kleinman saved lives with his insight into the basic mathematics of selection and mutation. But his succes is not much copied because, the theory of natural selection, is formulated wrong.

I can remember that the total asshole, and total liar, Matt Silberstein, chewed me out, because I would kill "millions of people", by throwing out natural selection theory, because of all the resistant diseases that would arise if the knowledge of natural selection were thrown out.

Not that it was realistic to happen that natural selection would be thrown out, but as a matter of principle he argued, that it would lead to millions of deaths.

But later dr Kleinman has shown, that my reformulation of natural selection to reproductive selection, actually helps to avoid diseases becoming resistant.

So now the shoe is on the other foot, and the evolutionists are in principle, guilty of killing millions of people, by letting resistant bacteria arise.

But the evolutionists, in their responses to Kleiman, do not give a flying fuck about people dying. Totally sick piece of shit scientists, these evolutionists.

It's just incredible how evolution scientists are totally intellectually dead, have no argumentaion, and spiritually dead, are not inspired by the prospect of saving many lives.

Which deadness is ofcourse because, the evolutionists have thrown out the idea of emotions, subjectivity, because they are inherently creationist concepts.