Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Making the rounds on Facebook...

26 views
Skip to first unread message

Louann Miller

unread,
May 23, 2012, 11:57:57 AM5/23/12
to
The "six images with captions" format is a running gag.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=331965553540098
&set=a.148116611924994.33707.136531246416864&type=1&ref=nf

Ray Martinez

unread,
May 23, 2012, 1:57:06 PM5/23/12
to
Hardly a gag; what we see is quite simple: the Atheist explanation of
man and the Christian explanation. The image is actually a caricature
disfavoring the Christian explanation.

Ray

chris thompson

unread,
May 23, 2012, 2:50:37 PM5/23/12
to
Nice image, but bad to lump all Christians into the same boat.

Chris

Frank J

unread,
May 23, 2012, 5:34:26 PM5/23/12
to
So what's the explanation from those whom you don't consider Christian or Atheist, specifically Behe, Dembski and those other "evolutionists" who at least share your paranoia of "Darwinism."


johnetho...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 25, 2012, 4:18:19 PM5/25/12
to
On May 23, 11:50�am, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The vast majority of Christians I have known are rational people who
do not fit this caricature. Of course people on the fringe (of
anything) get much more publicity and frequently appear to be more
numerous than they are.

Boikat

unread,
May 25, 2012, 11:36:32 PM5/25/12
to
Well, there is that little detail of "no supporting evidence" in favor
of creationism.

Boikat

Ray Martinez

unread,
May 26, 2012, 1:07:01 PM5/26/12
to
Creationists disagree.

All the evidence supports Genesis.

Ray

Rolf

unread,
May 27, 2012, 11:39:47 AM5/27/12
to
What evidence? Please show some of the best evidence you have. I have not
seen anything like evidence from you before, why have you been hiding it?



> Ray


jillery

unread,
May 27, 2012, 12:51:05 PM5/27/12
to
Not any evidence I know about.

TomS

unread,
May 27, 2012, 1:04:20 PM5/27/12
to
"On Sun, 27 May 2012 17:39:47 +0200, in article
<jpthqn$8cl$1...@news.albasani.net>, Rolf stated..."
I suggest that before we discuss the evidence, we make it clear which
interpretation of Genesis we're talking about.

Or is it that the evidence supports equally well several different
interpretations of Genesis?


--
---Tom S.
"Ah, yeah, well, whenever you notice something like that, a wizard did it"
Lucy Lawless, the Simpsons "Treehouse of Horror X: Desperately Xeeking Xena"
(1999)

ed wolf

unread,
May 27, 2012, 2:13:23 PM5/27/12
to
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2012 19:07:01 UTC+2 schrieb Ray Martinez:

>
> Creationists disagree.
>
> All the evidence supports Genesis.
>
> Ray

The only thing ever to support the fable of Genesis
is the quality of the paintings.This newly evolved
Homo Sapience is no match for Michelangelos Adam.
Rather brings to mind the old caption:
"stop following me, we are not related"
Why not separate the issue: you keep living in wonderland,
discussing Adams navel and such, and those that do research
and listen to logic and reason provide food,social structure,
buildings,transport and medicine. No Problem on my side.
ed wolf

0 new messages