Quote for today.
Nashton
"Just the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
As he landed his crew with care;
Supporting each man on the top of the tide
By a finger entwined in his hair.
"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
That alone should encourage the crew.
Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
What I tell you three times is true."
Ye Old One
Harpic!
--
Bob.
If brains were taxed, you would get a rebate.
bpuharic
and if i tell you for 2000 years it's called creationism
Nashton
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:18:20 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> enriched this
> group when s/he wrote:
>
>> Louis Carrol once wrote:
>>
>> "Just the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
>> As he landed his crew with care;
>> Supporting each man on the top of the tide
>> By a finger entwined in his hair.
>> "Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
>> That alone should encourage the crew.
>> Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
>> What I tell you three times is true."
>
>
> Harpic!
>
>
>
LMAO
"All drugs are derived from the ToE."
"Science is not a human invention, it's a discovery."
LOL
In a previous post, the lying scumbucket Ye Old One accused me of saying
these things in order to absolve himself from making these idiotic
statements that even a 12 year-old wouldn't make.
Dan Luke
"What a prat you are, Nashie."
--
Dan
"How can an idiot be a policeman? Answer me that!"
-Chief Inspector Dreyfus
Nashton
> Quote for tonight:
>
> "What a prat you are, Nashie."
>
Can you not use your newsreader to kf me?
Boikat
> Louis Carrol once wrote:
>
> "Just the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
> As he landed his crew with care;
> Supporting each man on the top of the tide
> By a finger entwined in his hair.
> "Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
> That alone should encourage the crew.
> Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
> What I tell you three times is true."
What's next? Vogon poetry?
Boikat
Ye Old One
What? And allow your lies and stupidity to go unchallenged?
No way.
--
Bob.
You have not been charged for this lesson - learn from it rather than
continuing to make a fool of yourself.
Ye Old One
group when s/he wrote:
>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:18:20 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> enriched this
>> group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>> Louis Carrol once wrote:
>>>
>>> "Just the place for a Snark!" the Bellman cried,
>>> As he landed his crew with care;
>>> Supporting each man on the top of the tide
>>> By a finger entwined in his hair.
>>> "Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:
>>> That alone should encourage the crew.
>>> Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:
>>> What I tell you three times is true."
>>
>>
>> Harpic!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>LMAO
>
>"All drugs are derived from the ToE."
Yes, you were stupid enough to claim that.
>
>"Science is not a human invention, it's a discovery."
>
That is correct. Get yourself a dictionary and educate yourself on the
difference between "discovery" and "invention".
>LOL
>
>In a previous post, the lying scumbucket Ye Old One accused me of saying
>these things in order to absolve himself from making these idiotic
>statements that even a 12 year-old wouldn't make.
Well, you have to be honest and admit that one of them is yours.
>
--
Bob.
Have you ever wondered what your life would be like if you had had
enough oxygen at birth?
Nashton
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:25:22 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> enriched this
> group when s/he wrote:
>
>> Dan Luke wrote:
>>> Quote for tonight:
>>>
>>> "What a prat you are, Nashie."
>>>
>> Can you not use your newsreader to kf me?
>
>
> What? And allow your lies and stupidity to go unchallenged?
>
> No way.
>
>
And here you have it. YOO, the dumbest schmuck to ever hit the Usenet
seeking attention *again*.
Mike Lyle
_The Hunting of the Snark_ before knocking it. I'm a little surprised
that he's heard of it, but maybe he'd read "What I tell you three times
is true" somewhere and discovered that it was a quotation. If he'd
actually read it, or one of the Alice books, I imagine he'd know how to
spell the author's name.
--
Mike.
Desertphile
And thus was the Bible created.
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Ye Old One
group when s/he wrote:
>Ye Old One wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:25:22 -0400, Nashton <na...@na.ca> enriched this
>> group when s/he wrote:
>>
>>> Dan Luke wrote:
>>>> Quote for tonight:
>>>>
>>>> "What a prat you are, Nashie."
>>>>
>>> Can you not use your newsreader to kf me?
>>
>>
>> What? And allow your lies and stupidity to go unchallenged?
>>
>> No way.
>>
>>
>
>And here you have it. YOO, the dumbest schmuck to ever hit the Usenet
>seeking attention *again*.
If you didn't keep lying you would look a lot brighter.
Now, do you have any evidence to back up your claim, and remember that
you are the ONLY one to make it, that "All drugs are derived from the
ToE"?
No? Thought not. You are just a grade A moron.
gregwrld
wrote:
Nashie-poo has zero credibility. This is just
another pathetic attempt to earn it.
gregwrld
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by Nashton <na...@na.ca>:
....says the OP of an off-topic post.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Bob Casanova
in talk.origins, posted by "Mike Lyle"
<mike_l...@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk>:
Name*s*. He got them both wrong.
And FWIW I agree; anything of Dodgson's is worth reading.
odin
All drugs are derived from science. All science is derived from
humanity. All humanity is derived from biological evolution. In fact,
everything is derived directly or indirectly from one or more
evolutionary processes of some sort. Even religion has evolved.
> "Science is not a human invention, it's a discovery."
Science as a process or method is a human invention. Science as an
activity is focused on discovery.
John Wilkins
<mike_l...@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk> wrote:
"� as complete a destruction as was possible of the doctrine that all
the distinctive characters of every species must necessarily be useful,
vestigial or correlated. For it became unquestionable that the same
generalization admitted of being made, with the same degree of effect,
touching all the distinctive characters of every �snark�. "
George Romanes, 1895, Address to the British Association
Apropos of nothing...
Mike Lyle
> In article <hema9r$3aq$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, Mike Lyle
> <mike_l...@REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>> That's more unfair even than Nashton deserves. You should get to know
>> _The Hunting of the Snark_ before knocking it. I'm a little surprised
>> that he's heard of it, but maybe he'd read "What I tell you three
>> times is true" somewhere and discovered that it was a quotation. If
>> he'd actually read it, or one of the Alice books, I imagine he'd
>> know how to spell the author's name.
>
> the distinctive characters of every species must necessarily be
> useful, vestigial or correlated. For it became unquestionable that
> the same generalization admitted of being made, with the same degree
> of effect, touching all the distinctive characters of every �snark�. "
>
> George Romanes, 1895, Address to the British Association
>
> Apropos of nothing...
...still, seems to remind me of something...
--
Mike.
Boikat
wrote:
I've nothing against "The Hunting of the Snark", nor was I knocking
it, rather Nashty-poo's vague point.
Boikat
Mike Lyle
suggestion that he didn't really know the literary gem in question.
--
Mike.
richardal...@googlemail.com
wrote:
It's spelled "Charles Dodgson", of course.
RF
Bob Casanova
appeared in talk.origins, posted by gregwrld
<GCze...@msn.com>:
>Nashie-poo has zero credibility. This is just
>another pathetic attempt to earn it.
To earn zero credibility? I'd say "Mission accomplished!"