Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.

[Mike Painter]

Suzanne wrote:
<snip>
>>> All science does not say this, and it would not
>>> survive the Square of the Opposition aka the
>>> Aristotalian Square. All scientists are not
>>> non-beleivers in the Bible.
>>
>> Why wouldn't it survive the Aristotalian (sic) Square?
>> In particular as applied to science and not individual scientists.
>>
> Apparently someone has to explain to you what
> the Square of the Opposition is.

I belive it is a term you recently came across, don't understand but like
the sound of.
Einstein said that if you can't explain somethng you don't understand it, so
go ahead and explain it to me.

>>
>>
>> There is no field of science with the possible exception of
>> astronomy, that does not offer evidence that the flood could not
>> have happened.
>> It does not matter if a scientist does believe in the bible unless
>> he or she lets it interfere with science.
>>
>> There are well over 2 million scientists in just the united states
>> today and an organization that is trying to show that the bible is
>> right can only come up with a list of under 800, many of which are
>> not even scientists.
>> If they all were scientists and there were 800 that would still be
>> 0.04% of just the scientists in the USA.>
>>
> More nonsense.
>>
> Suzanne

[Louann Miller]

"Mike Painter" <md.pa...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:PriOm.43525$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad:

> Einstein said that if you can't explain somethng you don't understand
> it, so go ahead and explain it to me.

So did CS Lewis, if you want someone Suzanne might have respect for.

[John Wilkins]

In article <oMWdnZ56xvqBfJTW...@giganews.com>, Louann
Miller <loua...@yahoo.com> wrote:

What a pity his ability to explain outran his ability to understand,
then...