On 4/10/15 10:14 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:24:00 -0700, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by "Glenn" <g...@invalid.invalid>:
>
>>
>> "Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote in message news:apddiat27guadhb0h...@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:20:14 -0700, the following appeared
>>> in talk.origins, posted by Jimbo <xkl...@npt8t.ops>:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT), Spin Tronic
>>>> <
pdblack...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As the universe evolves, eventually there will only be "Super Massive Black Holes" left, where there once were galaxies.
>>>>> As space expands, it's velocity exceeds the speed of light. Encasing us in a "Cosmological horizon".
>>>>> This horizon is shrinking for every observer, as the accelleration of space breaks the speed of light in a smaller volume.
>>>>> Eventually, each "Cosmological Horizon", will shrink down to the siz of each remaining SMBH.
>>>>> And the "Event Horizon", of each "Super Massive Black Hole", will meet the "Cosmological Horizon", it is encased in.
>>>>
>>>> Is the expansion of space affected by gravity?
>>>
>>> Current hypotheses appear to say it's most dependent on
>>> "dark energy".
>
>> I'd say that current hypotheses say that gravity is affected by the expansion of spacetime.
>
> Could be; I'm no cosmologist. Cite, so I can read about (and
> probably misunderstand) it?
>
The (local) curvature of spacetime IS gravity. As the current expansion