info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Predicting what will happen, according to the theory that subjectivity is rejected in academics
53 views
Skip to first unread message
mohammad...@gmail.com
Jan 9, 2022, 4:40:32 PM1/9/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
These things like skyrocketting mental illness in college, transgenderism, cancel culture, downward trend of familylife, downward trend of religion, downward trend of national feeling, increasd socialism, downward trend of friendships, downward trend of entertainment culture, these fall well within the scope of what could be the effects of academics throwing out subjectivity with evolution theory.
But I didn't actually see transgenderism coming. I did not predict it. Maybe I should have been able to predict it. What can be predicted on account of academics annihiliating subjectivity?
Something that can be predicted that is a very particular effect of academics throwing out subjectivity, so that it could not so easily explained by something else.
So we have the regular inclination of people to make every issue factual, and ignore the subjective part or reality.
And then evolution theory as a catalyst on that weakness.
While creationism provides the solution.
But the religious are entrenched, sitting on the solution of creationism, in a coping mechanism, where morality is held to be objective.
Then there is the memory of the holocaust, which precludes social darwinism to some extent.
Those are the main parameters of the situation.
So the student is pushed towards social darwinism, but is then also pushed away from social darwinism, by the memory of the holocaust.
So the student in such a situation will imagine that the social darwinism, is coming from themselves. Which is partly true, but for a large part it comes from evolution theory.
Most of the students are going to think of themselves as being terrible people, for coming up with all these social darwinist ideas. Having no clue that social darwinism is a logical consequence of accepting evolution theory.
They are also going to be bad at anything where subjectivity plays a big role, which is mainly personal relations.
People's ideas, mostly center around love. So the idea about love is a key predictor, in the intellect.
Their idea about love is going to be that it is something that is factual, objective, and created in the brain.
So they will cultivate a hypersensitivity towards something objective in the brain, which something they believe to be love, but instead it is....
It could be the word love. It could be some vague expression of emotion in the brain, consisting of some electrons or whatever.
I'm going to predict it will be the word love. So that people will become hyper sensitive about the word love, and get triggered by it tremendously. Go crazy over the word.
But I didn't actually see transgenderism coming. I did not predict it. Maybe I should have been able to predict it. What can be predicted on account of academics annihiliating subjectivity?
Something that can be predicted that is a very particular effect of academics throwing out subjectivity, so that it could not so easily explained by something else.
So we have the regular inclination of people to make every issue factual, and ignore the subjective part or reality.
And then evolution theory as a catalyst on that weakness.
While creationism provides the solution.
But the religious are entrenched, sitting on the solution of creationism, in a coping mechanism, where morality is held to be objective.
Then there is the memory of the holocaust, which precludes social darwinism to some extent.
Those are the main parameters of the situation.
So the student is pushed towards social darwinism, but is then also pushed away from social darwinism, by the memory of the holocaust.
So the student in such a situation will imagine that the social darwinism, is coming from themselves. Which is partly true, but for a large part it comes from evolution theory.
Most of the students are going to think of themselves as being terrible people, for coming up with all these social darwinist ideas. Having no clue that social darwinism is a logical consequence of accepting evolution theory.
They are also going to be bad at anything where subjectivity plays a big role, which is mainly personal relations.
People's ideas, mostly center around love. So the idea about love is a key predictor, in the intellect.
Their idea about love is going to be that it is something that is factual, objective, and created in the brain.
So they will cultivate a hypersensitivity towards something objective in the brain, which something they believe to be love, but instead it is....
It could be the word love. It could be some vague expression of emotion in the brain, consisting of some electrons or whatever.
I'm going to predict it will be the word love. So that people will become hyper sensitive about the word love, and get triggered by it tremendously. Go crazy over the word.
Lawyer Daggett
Jan 9, 2022, 6:55:32 PM1/9/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 4:40:32 PM UTC-5, mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
> These things like skyrocketting mental illness in college, transgenderism, cancel culture, downward trend of familylife, downward trend of religion, downward trend of national feeling, increasd socialism, downward trend of friendships, downward trend of entertainment culture, these fall well within the scope of what could be the effects of academics throwing out subjectivity with evolution theory.
>
> But I didn't actually see transgenderism coming. I did not predict it. Maybe I should have been able to predict it. What can be predicted on account of academics annihiliating subjectivity?
Can you clarify? It's academics that are responsible for Ronald Reagan divorcing
> These things like skyrocketting mental illness in college, transgenderism, cancel culture, downward trend of familylife, downward trend of religion, downward trend of national feeling, increasd socialism, downward trend of friendships, downward trend of entertainment culture, these fall well within the scope of what could be the effects of academics throwing out subjectivity with evolution theory.
>
> But I didn't actually see transgenderism coming. I did not predict it. Maybe I should have been able to predict it. What can be predicted on account of academics annihiliating subjectivity?
and remarrying? For Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter being married for 75 years.
For Newt Gingrich serving his wife divorce papers while she was in the hospital
with cancer so he could marry his mistress. For Barack and Michelle Obama to
still be (apparently) happily married? For that Trump guy to be on his third marriage
after multiple scandalous public affairs while still married?
Does it seem odd to you that the ones who deny scientific objectivity are the
ones that are the ones with multiple failed marriages while the ones you think
are responsible for this "downward trend of familylife" are the ones with long
term marriages?
All these things you imagine to have "downward trends" are evident in the whole
of recorded human history, most of which predates the scientific revolution.
I guess for you, if it 'subjectively' feels like a downward trend that matters more
than observed reality. I just don't get this business of downgrading observed facts
to conform to your feelings.
Joe Cummings
Jan 10, 2022, 2:40:32 AM1/10/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
A message from Mohammed without a single bad word!
Is he ill?
Joe Cummings
Joe Cummings
Jan 10, 2022, 2:45:32 AM1/10/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
mohammad...@gmail.com
Jan 10, 2022, 5:15:33 AM1/10/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
Obviously you're a liar. There is no doubt that divorce has increased, and many growing up without a father in the home.
And Obama is a total fucking asshole socialist. A total fucking fake. I see the love in the Trump family, while the Obama family, it's the typical fascist family, where it's about doing your best, and people being lower and higer, not about love.
p maandag 10 januari 2022 om 00:55:32 UTC+1 schreef Lawyer Daggett:
And Obama is a total fucking asshole socialist. A total fucking fake. I see the love in the Trump family, while the Obama family, it's the typical fascist family, where it's about doing your best, and people being lower and higer, not about love.
p maandag 10 januari 2022 om 00:55:32 UTC+1 schreef Lawyer Daggett:
youngbl...@gmail.com
Jan 19, 2022, 8:25:34 PM1/19/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
that are not there.
There are no gods unless we create them.
Dexter
Jan 19, 2022, 9:25:34 PM1/19/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
mohammad...@gmail.com wrote:
> Obviously you're a liar. There is no doubt that divorce has
> increased, and many growing up without a father in the home.
>
> And Obama is a total fucking asshole socialist. A total
> fucking fake.
Seems you're behind the times there Einstein. Obama
> Obviously you're a liar. There is no doubt that divorce has
> increased, and many growing up without a father in the home.
>
> And Obama is a total fucking asshole socialist. A total
> fucking fake.
hasn't been president since January 2017.
*Hemidactylus*
Jan 20, 2022, 12:00:34 AM1/20/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
laundromat in Baltimore and trying to figure out how they are going to
prevent JFK and JFK Jr from coming after Billary and and reinstating Trump
the 4D chess player with the Pillow Guy as his VP.
mohammad...@gmail.com
Jan 20, 2022, 10:20:34 AM1/20/22
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
Asswipe, the other asshole brought up how the Obamas are supposedly a happy family, proving that there is nothing going on with academics throwing out subjectivity.
It is well known that Michelle Obama is mentally ill with depression, and often talks about that.
And you are obviously another one of these fact obsessed smartalecs, who is utterly clueless about subjectivity.
Everyone knows, there is the absolute guarantee that generally the personality of people now is worse than it was, and getting much worse rapidly.
Everyone feels this. It is simply absolutely unthinkable that a great personality like John Wayne, or Jimmy Stewart, will crop up in the movies, nor in any other sphere of society.
Which is because academics has thrown all what is subjective out the window. Thrown out the entire spiritual domain, including emotions, and God. Now there are millions upon millions of atheist smart alecs in societies, who solely understand about objectivity, facts, science, and who have no comprehension whatsoever of subjectivity. None whatsoever, none.
Things can only get much, much, worse, and everyone feels this.
Op donderdag 20 januari 2022 om 02:25:34 UTC+1 schreef youngbl...@gmail.com:
It is well known that Michelle Obama is mentally ill with depression, and often talks about that.
And you are obviously another one of these fact obsessed smartalecs, who is utterly clueless about subjectivity.
Everyone knows, there is the absolute guarantee that generally the personality of people now is worse than it was, and getting much worse rapidly.
Everyone feels this. It is simply absolutely unthinkable that a great personality like John Wayne, or Jimmy Stewart, will crop up in the movies, nor in any other sphere of society.
Which is because academics has thrown all what is subjective out the window. Thrown out the entire spiritual domain, including emotions, and God. Now there are millions upon millions of atheist smart alecs in societies, who solely understand about objectivity, facts, science, and who have no comprehension whatsoever of subjectivity. None whatsoever, none.
Things can only get much, much, worse, and everyone feels this.
Op donderdag 20 januari 2022 om 02:25:34 UTC+1 schreef youngbl...@gmail.com:
0 new messages