Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Criticism of 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution

34 views
Skip to first unread message

Sebastian Sandstedt

unread,
Oct 1, 2012, 10:41:50 PM10/1/12
to
Has Theobald responded to Ashby Camps critique of " 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution"?

Ron O

unread,
Oct 1, 2012, 10:49:40 PM10/1/12
to
On Oct 1, 9:44 pm, Sebastian Sandstedt <valsre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has Theobald responded to Ashby Camps critique of " 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution"?

Probably here:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/camp.html

Ron Okimoto

Sebastian Sandstedt

unread,
Oct 1, 2012, 11:02:47 PM10/1/12
to
and then later Camps responded with http://www.trueorigin.org/ca_ac_01.asp. Has there been anything after that?

jillery

unread,
Oct 2, 2012, 2:32:44 AM10/2/12
to
Ron cited article includes a link to your follow-up cite, with the
explanation that Dr. Theobald added comments from there.

So, yes.

Ron O

unread,
Oct 2, 2012, 7:47:12 AM10/2/12
to
On Oct 1, 10:04�pm, Sebastian Sandstedt <valsre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den tisdagen den 2:e oktober 2012 kl. 04:49:46 UTC+2 skrev Ron O:
>
> > On Oct 1, 9:44�pm, Sebastian Sandstedt <valsre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Has Theobald responded to Ashby Camps critique of " 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution"?
>
> > Probably here:
>
> >http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/camp.html
>
> > Ron Okimoto
>
> and then later Camps responded withhttp://www.trueorigin.org/ca_ac_01.asp. Has there been anything after that?

Jillery answered. Is there something specific that you have a
question about?

Basically creationist anti-science literature is bogus. You can take
that to the bank in nearly every case. All it is good for is as an
exercise in determining how bogus it is.

Here is a pro science creationist site that you can look into.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.origins/msg/d9276ac7cbdacaa5?hl=en

Ron Okimoto

0 new messages