The epa is not doing their job!!!

[mark]

the point is if there is a conspiracy to hide the dangers and I
believe there is, the epa is not the best judge of overall dangers.
Talking to you is not the finest example of objective reasoning in the
world. I have nothing to gain to lie, the epa has been accused of
partisan politics many many times and afterall the less polluters they
describe the less work they have to do, so you want objective? The
lawyers for the state of Pa, who sued for the epa to do more against
polluters and won are a better example of objectivity cause obviously
if you have to sue the agency that is suppose to assure cleaner
environments, being sued for not doing that, don't make them objective
do they?
I already suggested that the epa defaults to wrong descriptions of
quality of air on their website on top of that.. Claiming moderate
amounts of particulate pollution affect the sensitive and nothing
more.. First off why would moderate sicken anyone? 2. Their own
readings at airnow.gov , by the way which seem to be an accurateway to
judge the levels and I found to be rather accurate. counters their
overall ratings which you referred to.. I emailed them about why that
is ! No response. I have nothing to gain to tell the truth.