Why are Americans such wankers.
Bevyn Quiding
In article <5frtka$k...@airdmhor.gen.nz>, br...@airdmhor.gen.nz (Aaron
Hicks) wrote:
> nett...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> : Duke wrote:
> : Why are americans such Wankers? Hmm, lets think what the Americans have
> : brought to the world! First of all, none of us would be typing this if
> : it were not for americans. Americans invented the computer. We also
> : invented the airplane, Automobile, Television, Radio, Telephone
> : Care to comment? Reply by email only please!
>
> Automobile, Mercedes & Benze, like ring any bells...
> Television, hmmm, an Oxford guy at the BBC...
> Radio, Marconi, born in Italy...
> Telephone, Bell was a yank.
>
> Any how we split the atom first (Go Lord Rutherford of Nelson) right here at
> the University of Canterbury, Christchurch NZ. And we climbed Everest, and
> we've got "your" cup, and it's all because WE'VE GOT GUN CONTROL.
Aye, incidenatlly the Wright brothers only flew a manned fixed wing
aircraft first which hardly qualifies as inventing the airplane. Given
all the related fields which the americans were behind until the german
scientists defected after the war.
Bevyn
--
You have reached me at an instance of temporary sanity .
Please call back later.
" when choosing between two evils.
I try the one I haven't done before " -- Mae West
Simon Stewart
On 9 Mar 1997, Aaron Hicks wrote:
> nett...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> : Duke wrote:
> : Why are americans such Wankers? Hmm, lets think what the Americans have
> : brought to the world! First of all, none of us would be typing this if
> : it were not for americans. Americans invented the computer. We also
> : invented the airplane, Automobile, Television, Radio, Telephone
> : Care to comment? Reply by email only please!
>
> Automobile, Mercedes & Benze, like ring any bells...
> Television, hmmm, an Oxford guy at the BBC...
> Radio, Marconi, born in Italy...
> Telephone, Bell was a yank.
>
Computer, Alan Turing (British) at Manchester, England
Alan Moss
Simon Stewart <s...@urn.nott.ac.uk> wrote in article
<Pine.LNX.3.91.970312...@urn.su.nottingham.ac.uk>...
Bell was from Scotland,you dumb knobscab,haven't you read any of the
previous posts ?
The only good thing that came from America was Howie from the Fall Guy.
Neil....@ncl.ac.uk
Omally 'I afraid to give out my email address' wrote:
> I take it to mean that all people in this country are backward
>,illiterate and uneducated,well if thats what you ment you are very very
>wrong!!
Your not necessarily those things, your just inbred. Its not your fault.
>Some of the most intelligent people in the world are and have
>been Americans(I didnt see the british walk
>on the moon or end world war 11).
If it takes intelligence to walk all americans must be crawling around
the streets.
I didn't see the Americans walk on the moon, mainly because they never
did, they had to fake the landing because they're so up tight they
couldn't admit to not being able to do it.
I didnt see the Americans end ww2, I saw Russia, France, America and the
Commonwealth nations end it. Besides, the yanks entered the war two
years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not. Dumb ass in-breds.
> Unlike my friend Paradigm I have never had any respect for the English
>and have always thought that the English have been nothing more than a >bunch of sniviling little babies that couldnt tie there own=
shoe lasses >with out the help of an American,if it were not for America German would >be the official language of England.
Who gives a shite who you have respect for or not. The yanks are just a
bunch of up tight twats who think they own the world, but the truth is
they couldnt fight their way out of a paper bag.
If it wasn't for the English you'd be speaking French.
> I for one would not lose a minutes sleep if all of you over there in
>limy or should I say slimy land got nuked tomorrow,you all look and
>sound like a bunch of fags to me!!!
I for one would lose sleep if America got nuked, I'd spend all my time
celebrating. The country that supposedly created the bombs is shit
scared of them (i.e Cuban missle crisis....some crisis).
> I also have a question for all of you over in England,I have an Irish
>friend and he says that most of the English males are pedophiles is that
>true?
Why do you ask?? Looking for some new friends???
I bet this friend is a 'special' friend, a little 'special' friend no
doubt.
>He also tells me that your scared of the Irish and I believe him on
>that on.Maybe America should bail you out AGAIN,but I dont think they >will you see we LIKE the Irish because there not a bunch of =
pussys.
How are they scared of the Irish??? Examples. The only reason when your
government likes the Irish is when it has an election to win, after which
it couldnt give a shit.
If america is so fucking great, why is it they've never won a war that
the British werent involved in as their allies.
> I have one more thing to say to all you English ass hole and I say this
>with all my heart and soul.KISS MY HAIRY WHITE AMERICAN ASS!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, gorilla cheeks, i'd rather not if you dont mind.
Wait whats that I here, its your mommy calling, sounds like its time for
some more in-breeding
'Sarcasm - Its a wonderful thing.....one day they might understand it in
WANKYLAND.
Bert Van Vreckem
They take themselves too seriously when others call them wankers...
--
:&:
# Bert 'Ernie' Van Vreckem
# Computer Science student at Brussels Free University
_#_ we4...@vub.ac.be bvv...@wendy.vub.ac.be
( # ) http://student.vub.ac.be/~we49807
/ O \ Ninoofsesteenweg 70 / B-1760 Roosdaal / Belgium
( === )
`---'´ I got a homecomputer, I got lots of floppy disks
But for my taste of music, I won't take many risks
I only take the real thing, 'cos I'm a healthy bloke
My friends are into hip hop, but I am into folk!
(The Radios)
Jeff Hubbell
Oh, give it a rest. All of you.
Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote in article <5g8lcu$l...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>...
Omally 'I afraid to give out my email address' wrote:
> I take it to mean that all people in this country are backward
>,illiterate and uneducated,well if thats what you ment you are very very
>wrong!!
Your not necessarily those things, your just inbred. Its not your fault.
>Some of the most intelligent people in the world are and have
>been Americans(I didnt see the british walk
>on the moon or end world war 11).
If it takes intelligence to walk all americans must be crawling around
the streets.
I didn't see the Americans walk on the moon, mainly because they never
did, they had to fake the landing because they're so up tight they
couldn't admit to not being able to do it.
I didnt see the Americans end ww2, I saw Russia, France, America and the
Commonwealth nations end it. Besides, the yanks entered the war two
years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not. Dumb ass in-breds.
> Unlike my friend Paradigm I have never had any respect for the English
>and have always thought that the English have been nothing more than a
>bunch of sniviling little babies that couldnt tie there own shoe lasses
>with out the help of an American,if it were not for America German would
>be the official language of England.
Who gives a shite who you have respect for or not. The yanks are just a
bunch of up tight twats who think they own the world, but the truth is
they couldnt fight their way out of a paper bag.
If it wasn't for the English you'd be speaking French.
> I for one would not lose a minutes sleep if all of you over there in
>limy or should I say slimy land got nuked tomorrow,you all look and
>sound like a bunch of fags to me!!!
I for one would lose sleep if America got nuked, I'd spend all my time
celebrating. The country that supposedly created the bombs is shit
scared of them (i.e Cuban missle crisis....some crisis).
> I also have a question for all of you over in England,I have an Irish
>friend and he says that most of the English males are pedophiles is that
>true?
Why do you ask?? Looking for some new friends???
I bet this friend is a 'special' friend, a little 'special' friend no
doubt.
>He also tells me that your scared of the Irish and I believe him on
>that on.Maybe America should bail you out AGAIN,but I dont think they
>will you see we LIKE the Irish because there not a bunch of pussys.
How are they scared of the Irish??? Examples. The only reason when your
government likes the Irish is when it has an election to win, after which
it couldnt give a shit.
If america is so fucking great, why is it they've never won a war that
the British werent involved in as their allies.
> I have one more thing to say to all you English ass hole and I say this
>with all my heart and soul.KISS MY HAIRY WHITE AMERICAN ASS!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, gorilla cheeks, i'd rather not if you dont mind.
Wait whats that I here, its your mommy calling, sounds like its time for
some more in-breeding
'Sarcasm - Its a wonderful thing.....one day they might understand it in
WANKYLAND.
----------
Jason Menayan
> Your not necessarily those things, your just inbred. Its not your fault.
This is an interesting allegation. It seems that Europeans usually accuse
us Americans of being mixed too much (we certainly have more ethnic mixes
than the UK) and that Americans accuse Europeans of being inbred. Your
insult, while false, is an interestingly ironic one.
> If it takes intelligence to walk all americans must be crawling around
> the streets.
Hmmm....why is it that U.S. is the world center for innovation?
> I didn't see the Americans walk on the moon, mainly because they never
> did, they had to fake the landing because they're so up tight they
> couldn't admit to not being able to do it.
You must be a troll. Or a social degenerate.
> I didnt see the Americans end ww2, I saw Russia, France, America and the
> Commonwealth nations end it. Besides, the yanks entered the war two
> years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
> whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not. Dumb ass in-breds.
Yes, all the allied forces ended ww2. If you remember correctly, though,
the UK gave Hitler free reign to take over continental Europe and took its
sweet time to intervene also. So please don't use the moralistic
argument, you eleven-fingered Brit.
> Who gives a shite who you have respect for or not. The yanks are just a
> bunch of up tight twats who think they own the world, but the truth is
> they couldnt fight their way out of a paper bag.
> If it wasn't for the English you'd be speaking French.
Uptight twats? Another insult that has been commonly reserved for the
Brits. Americans are usually not accused of being uptight. I can't help
but think you have some kind of learning disorder and that you should
substitute "Brit" with "American" everywhere you've written.
> I for one would lose sleep if America got nuked, I'd spend all my time
> celebrating. The country that supposedly created the bombs is shit
> scared of them (i.e Cuban missle crisis....some crisis).
You *should* celebrate, because if the U.S. were to blow up, you wouldn't
have a job tomorrow. Your economy would collapse. The economies of the
world are more interdependent than you would obviously care to recognize.
We Americans know this and that's why we intervene in a lot of conflicts
around the world. We also wish you Europeans would get over your petty
differences and make the EU something more than just a name.
Cuban missile crisis.....ever hear of the Soviet Union? A Soviet threat
was scary enough for your country to join NATO, wasn't it?
> How are they scared of the Irish??? Examples. The only reason when your
> government likes the Irish is when it has an election to win, after which
> it couldnt give a shit.
That's the truth.
> If america is so fucking great, why is it they've never won a war that
> the British werent involved in as their allies.
Because the British almost always ARE involved as allies.
> Wait whats that I here, its your mommy calling, sounds like its time for
> some more in-breeding
A Brit who calls Americans stupid can't even write one sentence in his
mother tongue without a few grammatical and spelling errors. Tell us, are
you a hemophiliac like your royals?
--
Jason Menayan
San Francisco, California, USA
iszx...@szlixp.next
Homepage coming soon.
If you would like to mail me, remove the x's and z's from my address
Neil....@ncl.ac.uk
iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>In article <5g8lcu$l...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> If it takes intelligence to walk all americans must be crawling around
>> the streets.
>
>Hmmm....why is it that U.S. is the world center for innovation?
>
Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
>> I didn't see the Americans walk on the moon, mainly because they never
>> did, they had to fake the landing because they're so up tight they
>> couldn't admit to not being able to do it.
>
>You must be a troll. Or a social degenerate.
>
Hahaha my aching sides!!
Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
around mocking people.
>> I didnt see the Americans end ww2, I saw Russia, France, America and the
>> Commonwealth nations end it. Besides, the yanks entered the war two
>> years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
>> whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not. Dumb ass in-breds.
>
>Yes, all the allied forces ended ww2. If you remember correctly, though,
>the UK gave Hitler free reign to take over continental Europe and took its
>sweet time to intervene also. So please don't use the moralistic
>argument, you eleven-fingered Brit.
>
Fair enough point, but it doesn't alter the fact that the US only entered
because it got its precious little ships sunk, not because of the ethnic
cleansing.
Eleven fingers?? Try twelve, or cant you count that far.
>> I for one would lose sleep if America got nuked, I'd spend all my time
>> celebrating. The country that supposedly created the bombs is shit
>> scared of them (i.e Cuban missle crisis....some crisis).
>
>You *should* celebrate, because if the U.S. were to blow up, you wouldn't
>have a job tomorrow. Your economy would collapse. The economies of the
>world are more interdependent than you would obviously care to recognize.
>We Americans know this and that's why we intervene in a lot of conflicts
>around the world. We also wish you Europeans would get over your petty
>differences and make the EU something more than just a name.
>
I dont believe 'you wish us Europeans would make something of the EU', if
this is your wish then you must what to see your country lose its
position of power. The EU would walk all over the US. The EU would
become THE economic power.
It appears you don't read up on the actions of your own country, the
wouldn't have to intervene if they didn't cause so many problems in the
first place.
E.G. Iran-Contra, CIA-Colombia(drugs), Black-ops-Bosnia, CIA-Iraq.
Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
country on this planet.
>Jason Menayan
>San Francisco, California, USA
>iszx...@szlixp.next
>Homepage coming soon.
>If you would like to mail me, remove the x's and z's from my address
Goodnight!
D. G. Grainger
In article <5gcqdu$md6$1...@nnrp-101.bryant.webtv.net>,
David <dra...@webtv.net> wrote:
>WE AMERICANS ARE THE POLICEMEN OF THE WORLD, WE DIDN'T ASK FOR THE JOB,
>IT'S JUST THAT WE ARE THE BEST AND MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE
>WORLD....AND NEVER FORGET THAT.... ALL OF YOU DO UNTIL YOU NEED
>US....THEN IT'S A CALL TO THE GOOD OLD U.S.A......
Pretty much answered the question right there, didn't you?
Oh, and by the way,
*plonk*
--
Greg Grainger grai...@interlog.com
'The boredom wears off after a while.' - Rick Ashby
the reverse-psychology major
In article <5gcqdu$md6$1...@nnrp-101.bryant.webtv.net>,
David <dra...@webtv.net> wrote:
>WE AMERICANS ARE THE POLICEMEN OF THE WORLD, WE DIDN'T ASK FOR THE JOB,
>IT'S JUST THAT WE ARE THE BEST AND MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE
>WORLD....AND NEVER FORGET THAT.... ALL OF YOU DO UNTIL YOU NEED
>US....THEN IT'S A CALL TO THE GOOD OLD U.S.A......
>
... well, i could use some help. what's the number to call?
beelzibub
ps;
no, really ...
--
this is my .sig. it's one of the best .sigs on the 'net'. i know what
you're thinking: 'did he post 5 or 6 articles'? to tell you the truth i
kinda lost track myself. so you gotta ask yourself one question: 'have
you mamorized it yet?' huh, have you punk? go for it. make my bed.
da...@apertus.com
> In article <5frtka$k...@airdmhor.gen.nz>, br...@airdmhor.gen.nz (Aaron
> Hicks) wrote:
> > we've got "your" cup, and it's all because WE'VE GOT GUN CONTROL.
Too bad you don't have sledge hammer control. :)
The cup was in NZ how long before it was virtually destroyed
last week? It survived in America, complete with all the
guns, for how long?
Cheers,
Dave Johnson
Richard deVries
In article <5gcpfg$mcb$1...@nnrp-101.bryant.webtv.net>,
David <dra...@webtv.net> wrote:
>WE KICKED YOU ASSES ONCE, MUST WE DO IT AGAIN ?????
>
>DRAAC
I think there's a bit of difference between what the Americans were during WW2
and what they are now: wankers who are trying to catch up to Germany and
Japan and most of Western Europe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Devries
Jason Menayan
> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
> Hahaha my aching sides!!
> Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
> NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
> which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
> surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
> 'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
> around mocking people.
A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
> Fair enough point, but it doesn't alter the fact that the US only entered
> because it got its precious little ships sunk, not because of the ethnic
> cleansing.
> Eleven fingers?? Try twelve, or cant you count that far.
We entered because we were attacked. Rather pragmatic response, don't you
think?
> I dont believe 'you wish us Europeans would make something of the EU', if
> this is your wish then you must what to see your country lose its
> position of power. The EU would walk all over the US. The EU would
> become THE economic power.
Very wishful thinking. Why is that the U.S. has stated time and time
again that it is in complete support of the EU and EMU? Because then
Europe will be a stable, prosperous market for our products. Only
childish idiots like you think that we're afraid of a united Europe. We
just wish you'd get on with it.
> It appears you don't read up on the actions of your own country, the
> wouldn't have to intervene if they didn't cause so many problems in the
> first place.
> E.G. Iran-Contra, CIA-Colombia(drugs), Black-ops-Bosnia, CIA-Iraq.
Blacks-ops-Bosnia? I don't even understand this one
> Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
> country on this planet.
Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
--
Jason Menayan
In article <sci-agn....@reef.cs.jcu.edu.au>, sci...@jcu.edu.au
(Aaron Nielsen) wrote:
> Base that on something real. I think you'll find that the country with
> the most Nobel prize winners (for example) per capita isn't your beloved
> USA...
Doesn't matter. We have the highest number. Why do we have to have the
highest number *per capita*? We have the most technical intellectual
property of any country in the world. End of argument.
> ...except that the States are indeed full of utterly neurotic, stuck-up
> jerks. BTW, substituting "Brit" for "American" is really the sort of
> simpleton thing that I'd expect an American to suggest.
Yes, I'm sure that there are a few. I know a few, actually. But Britain
and Europe actually take pride in being uptight, stuck-up and neurotic.
Why deny them what they are so proud of? And the fact is, he was using
insults that are usually reserved for Brits. What would you say if I said
Australians were workaholic, high-strung corporate cogs that travel in
groups and are world-renowned for taking pictures everywhere?
> Apart from the blatant lie that Europe would collapse if the USA
> disappeared tomorrow, you seemed to have shot yourself in the foot with
> that one. If the economies of the world are so interdependent, how is a
> place like Europe going the collapse? If anything, Europe would benefit
> from trade within the EU. The only reason the US intervenes is to feel
> big in the pants.
....and to protect our markets. Yes, trade can exists *within* the EU.
And trade already exists *within* the U.S., obviously a lot less
restrictedly than in the EU as it stands now. And humans can eat grubs
and shrubs if the economies of the world collapse. Your point is...?
> >A Brit who calls Americans stupid can't even write one sentence in his
> >mother tongue without a few grammatical and spelling errors. Tell us, are
> >you a hemophiliac like your royals?
> You can talk. You can't even spell "haemophiliac". Bloody Yanks.
Haemophiliac-British spelling. Hemophiliac-American spelling. It really
bothers you that we don't do things your way, doesn't it? Poor thing.
I'm so sorry.
> "Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
> - American tourist (overheard - how else?)
Aaron still doesn't have a sense of humor... the New Zealanders are right
about you.
Aaron Nielsen
iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) writes:
>Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>> If it takes intelligence to walk all americans must be crawling around
>> the streets.
>Hmmm....why is it that U.S. is the world center for innovation?
Base that on something real. I think you'll find that the country with
the most Nobel prize winners (for example) per capita isn't your beloved
USA...
>> I didn't see the Americans walk on the moon, mainly because they never
>> did, they had to fake the landing because they're so up tight they
>> couldn't admit to not being able to do it.
>You must be a troll. Or a social degenerate.
Stop it, the pair of you.
>> I didnt see the Americans end ww2, I saw Russia, France, America and the
>> Commonwealth nations end it. Besides, the yanks entered the war two
>> years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
>> whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not. Dumb ass in-breds.
>Yes, all the allied forces ended ww2. If you remember correctly, though,
>the UK gave Hitler free reign to take over continental Europe and took its
>sweet time to intervene also. So please don't use the moralistic
>argument, you eleven-fingered Brit.
>> Who gives a shite who you have respect for or not. The yanks are just a
>> bunch of up tight twats who think they own the world, but the truth is
>> they couldnt fight their way out of a paper bag.
>> If it wasn't for the English you'd be speaking French.
(Actually, if it wasn't for the English, the now-English-speaking world
would be speaking Dutch, but that's just history for you.)
>Uptight twats? Another insult that has been commonly reserved for the
>Brits. Americans are usually not accused of being uptight. I can't help
>but think you have some kind of learning disorder and that you should
>substitute "Brit" with "American" everywhere you've written.
...except that the States are indeed full of utterly neurotic, stuck-up
jerks. BTW, substituting "Brit" for "American" is really the sort of
simpleton thing that I'd expect an American to suggest.
>> I for one would lose sleep if America got nuked, I'd spend all my time
>> celebrating. The country that supposedly created the bombs is shit
>> scared of them (i.e Cuban missle crisis....some crisis).
>You *should* celebrate, because if the U.S. were to blow up, you wouldn't
>have a job tomorrow. Your economy would collapse. The economies of the
>world are more interdependent than you would obviously care to recognize.
>We Americans know this and that's why we intervene in a lot of conflicts
>around the world. We also wish you Europeans would get over your petty
>differences and make the EU something more than just a name.
Apart from the blatant lie that Europe would collapse if the USA
disappeared tomorrow, you seemed to have shot yourself in the foot with
that one. If the economies of the world are so interdependent, how is a
place like Europe going the collapse? If anything, Europe would benefit
from trade within the EU. The only reason the US intervenes is to feel
big in the pants.
>> Wait whats that I here, its your mommy calling, sounds like its time for
>> some more in-breeding
>A Brit who calls Americans stupid can't even write one sentence in his
>mother tongue without a few grammatical and spelling errors. Tell us, are
>you a hemophiliac like your royals?
You can talk. You can't even spell "haemophiliac". Bloody Yanks.
Aaron Nielsen
sci...@jcu.edu.au
--
Aaron Nielsen sci...@jcu.edu.au
Neil....@ncl.ac.uk
iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>In article <5gbdvg$e...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
>> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
>> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
>
>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>
years that the americans have begun to catch up with the rest of the modern
world. Ever since they grabbed the nazi scientists.
Do us all a favour and read a science history book.
>> Hahaha my aching sides!!
>> Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
>> NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
>> which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
>> surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
>> 'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
>> around mocking people.
>
>A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
>
Obviously then you still haven't looked at the above mentioned photos.
Why not? Afraid of the truth?
How the hell can what I said be classed as 'chauvinistic'??? Please explain.
>> I dont believe 'you wish us Europeans would make something of the EU', if
>> this is your wish then you must what to see your country lose its
>> position of power. The EU would walk all over the US. The EU would
>> become THE economic power.
>
>Very wishful thinking. Why is that the U.S. has stated time and time
>again that it is in complete support of the EU and EMU? Because then
>Europe will be a stable, prosperous market for our products. Only
>childish idiots like you think that we're afraid of a united Europe. We
>just wish you'd get on with it.
>
WAKE UP! WAKE UP! You're dreaming boyo!!
I think you should read my words again, or at least try to, in NO WAY did I
say YOU are afraid of a united europe.
>> It appears you don't read up on the actions of your own country, the
>> wouldn't have to intervene if they didn't cause so many problems in the
>> first place.
>> E.G. Iran-Contra, CIA-Colombia(drugs), Black-ops-Bosnia, CIA-Iraq.
>
>Blacks-ops-Bosnia? I don't even understand this one
>
Why am I not surprised that you dont understand? Have you ever read any books
or newspapers.
So it appears you at least know about the others then?? So why no comment made
about them??
'Black-ops' -> Black operations: carried out by the CIA and Delta Force for
destabilizing purposes. Sniper attacks, arms shipments, etc.
>> Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
>> country on this planet.
>
>Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
>but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
>never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
>
Proof? Rodney King ring any bells?? Burning down churches used by Blacks.
It appears you have absolutely no idea what is being said.
British/European is not a race you stupid prick, its a nationality, where the
hell did you get your education.
White is a race
Black is a race
Oriental is a race
etc, etc
Stupid boy!!!
P.S: Jason, before you send any sort of a reply to this post, do us all a
favour? Go read some bloody books, take a look at said photos and then reply.
Your ignorance is tarnishing what little reputation your country has.
Have a nice life, loser.
Neil
Paul Louis
On Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:27:57 -0800, iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason
Menayan) wrote:
>In article <5gbdvg$e...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
>> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
>> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
>
>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
Oooh, another Jasoff-Fact.
Genuine fact a recent Japanese survey ascertained that since 1945 55%
of all patents have originated from Britain while only 25% originated
from the bad ole US of A
________________________________________________________
Paul Louis - pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
NB my reply to: adress is deliberatly wrong. Use the above address
"Every time Europe looks across the Atlantic to see the American Eagle, it observes
only the rear end of an ostrich."
--H. G. Wells
"America is the only nation in history which miraculously has gone directly from barbarism
to degeneration without the usual interval of civilization."
--Georges Clemenceau
Michael Walsh
Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> wrote in article
<Pine.OSF.3.95.970319...@dingo.cc.uq.edu.au>...
> Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite proud
> of it!
Oh piss off you Ozzie prat! Don't run down Americans, especially if you
happen to be descended from a bunch of Kangaroo-fucking convicts.
Ian Kent
Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite proud
here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented computers,
well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but the Japanese
are far more advanced technologically that the americans, so we would
still be typing we would just be doing it on better computers...so shove
that up your ever-righteous american butt!
stephen tweed
In article <5gi8hi$g...@newsserver.trl.OZ.AU>, da...@apertus.com writes
Pardon me for butting in but how does gun control have any bearing on
what i presume to be winning the Americas cup?
>
?
\*/
/-\
@-@
--oOo-(_)-oOo--
the greenpen free spirit
net citizen
email ste...@greenpen.demon.co.uk
Have you forgotten yet?....
Look up, and swear by the green of the spring that you`ll never forget.
Siegfried Sassoon
March 1919
rich...@genie.com
iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) writes:
>never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
Well, I'm the rest of the world, and *I* don't know it.
--
S Nelson
Michael Walsh wrote:
>
> Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> wrote in article
> <Pine.OSF.3.95.970319...@dingo.cc.uq.edu.au>...
> > of it!
>
> happen to be descended from a bunch of Kangaroo-fucking convicts.
Another intelligent being heard from!! How refreshing!! How original!!
Just in case you were unaware, people DID immigrate to Australia of
their own free will, just like people immigrate to the States of their
own free will. Get a grip.
Suzanne
David B. Greene
Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> says:
>
>Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite proud
>here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented computers,
>well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but the Japanese
>are far more advanced technologically that the americans, so we would
>still be typing we would just be doing it on better computers...so shove
>that up your ever-righteous american butt!
ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
Kanji on your computers.
David B. Greene
Neil....@ncl.ac.uk says:
>iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>>In article <5gbdvg$e...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>>
>>> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
>>> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
>>> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
What a pathetic come down, then, to be reduced to cloning sheep.
>>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>>
>For a hell of a lot longer than the first century, its only during the last 50
>years that the americans have begun to catch up with the rest of the modern
>world. Ever since they grabbed the nazi scientists.
>Do us all a favour and read a science history book.
Hell, we trained their scientists in the first place. Perhaps you ought to
read a real history book instead of the pap served by the British school
system.
>>> Hahaha my aching sides!!
>>> Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
>>> NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
>>> which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
>>> surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
>>> 'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
>>> around mocking people.
>>
>>A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
>>
>Obviously then you still haven't looked at the above mentioned photos.
>Why not? Afraid of the truth?
>How the hell can what I said be classed as 'chauvinistic'??? Please explain.
What!? Another "fake moon landing" conspiracy theorist. I thought you were
supposed to be smart, Neil.
>>> Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
>>> country on this planet.
>>
>>Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
>>but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
>>never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>>racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
>>
>Proof? Rodney King ring any bells?? Burning down churches used by Blacks.
>It appears you have absolutely no idea what is being said.
>British/European is not a race you stupid prick, its a nationality, where the
>hell did you get your education.
>White is a race
>Black is a race
>Oriental is a race
>etc, etc
>Stupid boy!!!
The British have been the most racist of all even though the second place
Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
India...
Africa...
Hong Kong...
Singapore...
you name it ...
Andrew/
In article <1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>
da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
> ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
> a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
> Kanji on your computers.
Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
Andrew/
'You're a Jerk, Dent'
Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged
Alan Pascoe
In Article<1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>,
<da...@halcyon.antispam.com> writes:
> The British have been the most racist of all even though the second
place
> Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
> India...
> Africa...
> Hong Kong...
> Singapore...
> you name it ...
This was not racism, just exploitation for financial gain.
Alan
--
"I think we have to very seriously consider the enormous disadvantages
of having a vast army of people who can communicate with each other
very easily." - quote from a Home Office official.
http://www.gn.apc.org/charter88
Rufus T. Firefly
Alan Pascoe wrote:
>
> In Article<1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>,
> <da...@halcyon.antispam.com> writes:
>
> > The British have been the most racist of all even though the second
> place
> > Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
> > India...
> > Africa...
> > Hong Kong...
> > Singapore...
> > you name it ...
>
> This was not racism, just exploitation for financial gain.
Yeah, man, after all: they're just brown people. Now, had they exploited
WHITE people...
David Schmitz
Excuse me sir, do you know what it's like?
Can you possibly understand?
You were blessed with a wonderful life,
I was destined to be who I am.
--
http://www.ecsd.com/~david
G. Mark Stewart
Andrew/ (and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: In article <1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>
: da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
: > ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
: > a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
: > Kanji on your computers.
: Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
Good lord, if it weren't for Americans, the British would probably be
speaking French. Or farting, pardon the redundancy.
Dave Greene
>> ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
>> a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
>> Kanji on your computers.
>Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
But the good thing is that we are not typing it on an English
keyboard. It will be a cold day in Hell before those Brits
ever live down the legacy of Clive Sinclair!
>Andrew/
The funny thing is how spew/ *always* goes apoplectic over those
"we saved youe ass in WWII" trolls while forgeting about the
original point. Hmmm ... maybe he knows that the Japanese have
never come up with a microprocessor worth a shit and that the
world leader in microprocessor technology is America.
Sigh-O-Nara you Eurowankers,
Dave Greene
Paul Louis
On 23 Mar 1997 02:45:42 GMT, gm...@grayfox.svs.com (G. Mark Stewart)
wrote:
>Andrew/ (and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk) wrote:
>: In article <1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>
>: da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
>
>: > ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
>: > a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
>: > Kanji on your computers.
>
>: Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
>
>
>Good lord, if it weren't for Americans, the British would probably be
>speaking French. Or farting, pardon the redundancy.
Oui, nous parlons le Français parce que nous avons un éducation
convenable. Crétin.
>GMS
Simon Read
rai...@super.zippo.coz (R A I D E R) wrote:
>
>With a little help from ASCII, ANSI, etc., American standards, used by much
>of the world.
ASCII was actually a British standard. The Americans just stole it,
renamed it "ASCII" and shouted about it, so everyone thinks it is
American. Shame.
Simon SReadCranfieldAcUk
Dan Browne
>Yeah, man, after all: they're just brown people. Now, had they exploited
>WHITE people...
We did fucknuts. See if you can guess who they might be.
Cheers,
Dan
Dan Browne
On Sun, 23 Mar 1997 02:53:32 GMT, da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave
Greene) wrote:
>Andrew/ <and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
>>Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
>
>But the good thing is that we are not typing it on an English
>keyboard.
Actually, the QWERTY keyboard was designed in England in the 19th
century. And as for where the keyboard I am typing on was
manufactured: "Made in Taiwan". As I suspect the majority are.
> Hmmm ... maybe [spew] knows that the Japanese have
>never come up with a microprocessor worth a shit and that the
>world leader in microprocessor technology is America.
/course all the DRAM is made elsewhere, the motherboards, the
monitors, the flat screen LCDs, the soundcards etc etc.
Idiot.
cheers,
Dan
Mao Tse-Tung
meet with me privately behind the stove.
Mao Tse-Tung
Mao Tse-Tung
Mao Tse-Tung
michelle lennon
you are a bit of a strange one aren't you?
from Lennon
--
Robert Hubby
Mao Tse-Tung (cd...@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
: meet with me privately behind the furnace. We must change the filter,
: NOW.
Uh...no.
Don't spam multiple posts of non-sequiturs, please.
R.A.H. Elf of the redwoods, Sonoma Valley, Breakfast Cereal Country.
"Israili murderers are called commandos. Arab commandos are called
'Terrorists.' Contra killers are called 'freedom fighters.' Well, if
crime fighters fight crime, and fire fighters fight fire, what do
freedom fighters fight?" - George Carlin
Jason Menayan
In article <3335a...@news.cranfield.ac.uk>, Simon Read
<bl...@blurgh.bleah.retch> wrote:
The United States was a British colony. The Americans just stole it,
renamed it "The United States of America" and shouted about it, so
everyone thinks it is American. Shame.
--
Jason Menayan
San Francisco, California, USA
Sarah_W...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca
rah...@sonic.net writes:
>: meet with me privately behind the furnace. We must change the filter,
>: NOW.
>
>Uh...no.
>
>Don't spam multiple posts of non-sequiturs, please.
interesting post on the 'merican-wanker thread I have seen so far...
<grin>
Lonewolf
--
"And like the ashes of his name, he too was bitter."
--
Aaron Nielsen
da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) writes:
>Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> says:
>>
>>Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite proud
>>of it! i only wrot this to say that your little line about "we wouldnt be
>>here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented computers,
>>well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but the Japanese
>>are far more advanced technologically that the americans, so we would
>>still be typing we would just be doing it on better computers...so shove
>>that up your ever-righteous american butt!
>ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
>a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
>Kanji on your computers.
Two words - American cars. Comprende?
Aaron Nielsen sci...@jcu.edu.au
"Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
- American tourist (overheard - how else?)
--
Aaron Nielsen sci...@jcu.edu.au
"Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
- American tourist (overheard - how else?)
Aaron Nielsen
da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) writes:
>Neil....@ncl.ac.uk says:
>>iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>>>In article <5gbdvg$e...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
>>>> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
>>>> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
>What a pathetic come down, then, to be reduced to cloning sheep.
Doesn't explain why Switzerland has more Nobel prize winners per capita
than any other country in the world, Great Britain included. Furthermore,
if cloning sheep was such a come-down, how come dopey President Clinton
wants to do the same in the States?
>>>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>>>
>>For a hell of a lot longer than the first century, its only during the last 50
>>years that the americans have begun to catch up with the rest of the modern
>>world. Ever since they grabbed the nazi scientists.
>>Do us all a favour and read a science history book.
>Hell, we trained their scientists in the first place. Perhaps you ought to
>read a real history book instead of the pap served by the British school
>system.
The States teaching the people who settled there about history? ROTFL!
>>>> Hahaha my aching sides!!
>>>> Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
>>>> NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
>>>> which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
>>>> surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
>>>> 'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
>>>> around mocking people.
>>>
>>>A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
>>>
>>Obviously then you still haven't looked at the above mentioned photos.
>>Why not? Afraid of the truth?
>>How the hell can what I said be classed as 'chauvinistic'??? Please explain.
>What!? Another "fake moon landing" conspiracy theorist. I thought you were
>supposed to be smart, Neil.
(Oh dear.)
>>>> Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
>>>> country on this planet.
>>>
>>>Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
>>>but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
>>>never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>>>racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
>>>
>>Proof? Rodney King ring any bells?? Burning down churches used by Blacks.
>>It appears you have absolutely no idea what is being said.
>>British/European is not a race you stupid prick, its a nationality, where the
>>hell did you get your education.
>>White is a race
>>Black is a race
>>Oriental is a race
>>etc, etc
>>Stupid boy!!!
>The British have been the most racist of all even though the second place
>Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
>India...
>Africa...
>Hong Kong...
>Singapore...
>you name it ...
It's tempting just to give up on these prats from the States, who
continually pass the buck on all that is wrong, and only to leave
themselves the time to take as much credit as they can from doing as
little as possible to merit it. The States calling the Britons racist?
No, I'm not laughing any more, this is just flat out hypocrisy. Face it,
the lot of you.
G. Mark Stewart
Aaron Nielsen (sci...@jcu.edu.au) wrote:
: da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) writes:
: >Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> says:
: >>
: >>Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite proud
: >>of it! i only wrot this to say that your little line about "we wouldnt be
: >>here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented computers,
: >>well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but the Japanese
: >>are far more advanced technologically that the americans, so we would
: >>still be typing we would just be doing it on better computers...so shove
: >>that up your ever-righteous american butt!
: >ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
: >a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
: >Kanji on your computers.
: Two words - American cars. Comprende?
Another two: Australian Anything.
Oh, right. There's Foster's. And those little bears are kinda' cute.
Paul Louis
>Neil....@ncl.ac.uk says:
>>iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>What a pathetic come down, then, to be reduced to cloning sheep.
Oh, do fuck off. Like cloning isn't a great scientific achievement.
>>>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>>>
>>For a hell of a lot longer than the first century, its only during the last 50
>>years that the americans have begun to catch up with the rest of the modern
>>world. Ever since they grabbed the nazi scientists.
>>Do us all a favour and read a science history book.
>
>Hell, we trained their scientists in the first place. Perhaps you ought to
>read a real history book instead of the pap served by the British school
>system.
"read a /real/ history book"? You wouldn't happen to be the same Dave
B. Greene who put all his store in the "Oxford Companion to World War
II" , would you?
>>Obviously then you still haven't looked at the above mentioned photos.
>>Why not? Afraid of the truth?
>>How the hell can what I said be classed as 'chauvinistic'??? Please explain.
>
>What!? Another "fake moon landing" conspiracy theorist. I thought you were
>supposed to be smart, Neil.
Neil is smart in that he doesn't blindly accept what his media tells
him. Perhaps, David, you might like to consider the posibility that
just because it's on at prime time doesn't mean it is the truth.
>>Proof? Rodney King ring any bells?? Burning down churches used by Blacks.
>>It appears you have absolutely no idea what is being said.
>>British/European is not a race you stupid prick, its a nationality, where the
>>hell did you get your education.
>>White is a race
>>Black is a race
>>Oriental is a race
>>etc, etc
>>Stupid boy!!!
>
>The British have been the most racist of all even though the second place
>Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
>India...
>Africa...
>Hong Kong...
>Singapore...
>you name it ...
Surely this is a troll. You can't really be this stupid can you? If
the above is a serious statement by you then all I can say is that you
are a sad, blind, ignorant media puppet.
Jason Menayan
In article <sci-agn....@reef.cs.jcu.edu.au>, sci...@jcu.edu.au
(Aaron Nielsen) wrote:
> >ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
> >a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
> >Kanji on your computers.
>
> Two words - American cars. Comprende?
Do you mean...what you drive? What about Australian cars?
Mao Tse-Tung
> you are a bit of a strange one aren't you?
CHRIST ALMIGHTY! WE GOT A LIVE ONE!
Christopher Hemme
In rec.org.mensa G. Mark Stewart <gm...@grayfox.svs.com> wrote:
->Aaron Nielsen (sci...@jcu.edu.au) wrote:
->: Two words - American cars. Comprende?
->Another two: Australian Anything.
->Oh, right. There's Foster's. And those little bears are kinda' cute.
And don't forget Yahoo Serious :)
As far as American cars... this isn't the 80's. American car
manufacturers have learned from their mistakes. On top of that, Japan
has learned that it's not invincible economically any more than it was
militarily in 1941. Last I heard, Ford had grabbed a big piece of one of
the big Japanese auto companies (Nissan, maybe? Don't the WSJ article
handy). Add to that the fact that once the Japanese recession hit, the
Japanese suddenly discovered that in order to keep enough capital in
order to survive, they had to sell back a lot of their trendy American
assests for huge losses due to the fact that the original American
sellers realized that the Japanese would pay *anything* for things like
movie studios and other such tripe. Oh well, turnabout's fair play.
Dave Greene
>>ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
>>a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
>>Kanji on your computers.
>Two words - American cars. Comprende?
ROTFL, the simple micros used in autos were all derived from earlier
American designs. Japan is not a pioneer in microprocessors no matter
how much you want to pretend they are. Even the UK leads Japan in
microprocessor technology which shows how pathetic they are. Even
Clive Sinclair had to select the American Z80.
Dave Greene
Dave Greene
da...@bigtroll.demon.co.uk (Dan Browne) wrote:
>da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave Greene) wrote:
>>Andrew/ <and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
>>>Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
>>
>>But the good thing is that we are not typing it on an English
>>keyboard.
>Actually, the QWERTY keyboard was designed in England in the 19th
>century.
GAWD, it figures, only a British mind could come up with something
so totally twisted.
> And as for where the keyboard I am typing on was
>manufactured: "Made in Taiwan". As I suspect the majority are.
Good thing too, otherwise you'd be stuck with Clive Sinclair's
piece of crap keyboard.
>> Hmmm ... maybe spew/ knows that the Japanese have
>>never come up with a microprocessor worth a shit and that the
>>world leader in microprocessor technology is America.
>/course all the DRAM is made elsewhere, the motherboards, the
>monitors, the flat screen LCDs, the soundcards etc etc.
Yes, they are made many places, where ever production costs are
cheap. Most of that stuff was not originally developed where
it is now being mass produced. Most of what you mention was
first developed in the states.
>Idiot.
Nice sig, Dan! Thanks for being honest about yourself.
Dave Greene
Dave Greene
Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
>da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) wrote:
>>Neil....@ncl.ac.uk says:
>>>iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason Menayan) wrote:
>>What a pathetic come down, then, to be reduced to cloning sheep.
>Oh, do fuck off. Like cloning isn't a great scientific achievement.
Well cloning seems to be the only thing you guys are good at. How
ironic that your first comment after sheep are mentioned has to do
with fucking.
>>>>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>>>>
>>>For a hell of a lot longer than the first century, its only during the last 50
>>>years that the americans have begun to catch up with the rest of the modern
>>>world. Ever since they grabbed the nazi scientists.
>>>Do us all a favour and read a science history book.
>>
>>Hell, we trained their scientists in the first place. Perhaps you ought to
>>read a real history book instead of the pap served by the British school
>>system.
>"read a /real/ history book"? You wouldn't happen to be the same Dave
>B. Greene who put all his store in the "Oxford Companion to World War
>II" , would you?
I realize it is a stretch to think Oxford could ever publish a *real*
history book. On the other hand, American Robert Goddard was the
guiding light of the German rocket scientists.
>>>Obviously then you still haven't looked at the above mentioned photos.
>>>Why not? Afraid of the truth?
>>
>>What!? Another "fake moon landing" conspiracy theorist. I thought you were
>>supposed to be smart, Neil.
>Neil is smart in that he doesn't blindly accept what his media tells
>him. Perhaps, David, you might like to consider the posibility that
>just because it's on at prime time doesn't mean it is the truth.
Paul, I think you've toured Area 51 too many times. Do you deny that
the landing on the moon occured?
>>The British have been the most racist of all even though the second place
>>Japanese have been vying for the top spot for centuries.
>>India...
>>Africa...
>>Hong Kong...
>>Singapore...
>>you name it ...
>Surely this is a troll. You can't really be this stupid can you? If
>the above is a serious statement by you then all I can say is that you
>are a sad, blind, ignorant media puppet.
Whatever, so shall we talk of Churchill, FDR and British colonialism in
Africa?
Dave Greene
Alan Miles
Aaron Nielsen wrote:
>
> Two words - American cars. Comprende?
Obviously you don't comprende. The big American car companies are quite
profitable just now. The Japanese ones aren't. And there aren't any
others of note.
Rick Kelly
In talk.bizarre Aaron Nielsen <sci...@jcu.edu.au> wrote:
: Doesn't explain why Switzerland has more Nobel prize winners per capita
: than any other country in the world, Great Britain included. Furthermore,
: if cloning sheep was such a come-down, how come dopey President Clinton
: wants to do the same in the States?
Sheep usually settle out of court.
--
Rick Kelly r...@seahag.rmkhome.com r...@rmkhome.com
<a href="http://tencats.rmkhome.com/">tencats</a>
Rick Kelly
In talk.bizarre IJdo Dijkstra <aur...@orion.xs4all.nl> wrote:
: rai...@super.zippo.coz (R A I D E R) wrote:
: >With a little help from ASCII, ANSI, etc., American standards...
: Teah...the same country that also brought us EBCDIC and Edlin...
And of course, you fucking forgot TECO.
Alan Miles
Paul Louis wrote:
>
> Oui, nous parlons le Français parce que nous avons un éducation
> convenable. Crétin.
Desolee. Pour quoi?
Pour quoi personne ne parle Français parce qu'il faut parler une langue
importante, comme Anglais. C'est triste mais notre belle langue va
mourir avant nous, je crois fortement. Parlez Anglais.
G. Mark Stewart
Rick Kelly (r...@rmkhome.com) wrote:
: In talk.bizarre Aaron Nielsen <sci...@jcu.edu.au> wrote:
: : Doesn't explain why Switzerland has more Nobel prize winners per capita
: : than any other country in the world, Great Britain included. Furthermore,
: : if cloning sheep was such a come-down, how come dopey President Clinton
: : wants to do the same in the States?
: Sheep usually settle out of court.
Sheep usually settle in a pasture.
Man, all this time I thought, "FOUR stooges!??" Then I read that again.
David B. Greene
don't...@bother.spamming.net (Jason Menayan) says:
>Simon Read <bl...@blurgh.bleah.retch> wrote:
>> rai...@super.zippo.coz (R A I D E R) wrote:
>> >
>> >by much of the world.
>>
>> ASCII was actually a British standard. The Americans just stole it,
>> renamed it "ASCII" and shouted about it, so everyone thinks it is
>> American. Shame.
>
>
>The United States was a British colony. The Americans just stole it,
>renamed it "The United States of America" and shouted about it, so
>everyone thinks it is American. Shame.
You Brits give yourself way too much credit. If you check a history
book, you'll find we stole most of it from the French, the Spanish,
the Russians and the Native Americans. Hell, we even stole more from
the Mexicans than we ever did from you guys (got better stuff too).
Dave Greene
David B. Greene
sci...@jcu.edu.au (Aaron Nielsen) says:
[snip discussion of American/Japanese technical superiority]
>Two words - American cars. Comprende?
Well, Aaron, you haven't cruised in style until you've cruised in
a big ol' American pimpmobile! And what would you rather drive on
a long road trip, some shitty little Subaru or a nice 442? Besides,
American cars are safer anyway.
Dave Greene
Mao Tse-Tung
> ... well, i could use some help. what's the number to call?
It really exists, and, better yet, it's toll-free!
(800) 325-1730
or, line 2 (they're damn busy)
(800) 628-2426
.
Jason Menayan
In article <334292da...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
wrote:
> >Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>
> I thought you didn't make factual errors, Moronyan. FYI since 1945 55%
> of all patents have been British.
Source?
> >A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
>
> Rather sensitive aren't we, Moronyan?
Was I the one screaming and using childish corruptions of Neil's name? In
any case, I don't think anyone will see Neil posting here anymore.
> >We entered because we were attacked. Rather pragmatic response, don't you
> >think?
>
> When did Germany attack you?
It didn't. Its ally Japan did. Ever hear of it? It's outside Europe,
just in case you weren't sure.
> The EU would not be a market for your products as it would be a far
> more productive and dominant force in the world than the US.
Too bad economists the world over disagree with your petty nationalist logic.
> >Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
> >but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
> >never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
> >racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
>
> Really? Proof? Jesus, you are such a fucking dense hypocrite it is
> untrue.
Rather sensitive, aren't we, Mr. Lewis?
Jason Menayan
In article <1997Mar26....@atl.com>, da...@halcyon.antispam.com
(David B. Greene) wrote:
> Well, Aaron, you haven't cruised in style until you've cruised in
> a big ol' American pimpmobile!
Excuse me, but the correct term for that class of vehicles is "hoopty."
Paul Louis
>>Oh, do fuck off. Like cloning isn't a great scientific achievement.
>
>Well cloning seems to be the only thing you guys are good at. How
>ironic that your first comment after sheep are mentioned has to do
>with fucking.
I'd say it was ironic that the first comment you make is total
bullshit but it's really more predictable than ironic.
>>>Hell, we trained their scientists in the first place. Perhaps you ought to
>>>read a real history book instead of the pap served by the British school
>>>system.
>
>>"read a /real/ history book"? You wouldn't happen to be the same Dave
>>B. Greene who put all his store in the "Oxford Companion to World War
>>II" , would you?
>
>I realize it is a stretch to think Oxford could ever publish a *real*
>history book.
No it's not, but the point is that for evidence you relied on a book
that was not only /British/ but also intended for school children.
>On the other hand, American Robert Goddard was the
>guiding light of the German rocket scientists.
So?
>>>What!? Another "fake moon landing" conspiracy theorist. I thought you were
>>>supposed to be smart, Neil.
>
>>Neil is smart in that he doesn't blindly accept what his media tells
>>him. Perhaps, David, you might like to consider the posibility that
>>just because it's on at prime time doesn't mean it is the truth.
>
>Paul, I think you've toured Area 51 too many times. Do you deny that
>the landing on the moon occured?
No, because I don't have sufficient information to make an assertion
either way. Do you?
>>Surely this is a troll. You can't really be this stupid can you? If
>>the above is a serious statement by you then all I can say is that you
>>are a sad, blind, ignorant media puppet.
>
>Whatever, so shall we talk of Churchill, FDR and British colonialism in
>Africa?
Why don't you? It'd be funny to see you struggling over historical
concepts with only "Dick and Jane study racial and political
interaction with relation to World War 2 social structures". Either
way your assertion that "The British have been the most racist of all"
is the sort of conclusory statement born out of either in depth study
or wholesale ignorance. I'm betting on the latter.
>Dave Greene
Paul Louis
On Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:27:57 -0800, iszx...@szlixp.next (Jason
Menayan) wrote:
>In article <5gbdvg$e...@whitbeck.ncl.ac.uk>, Neil....@ncl.ac.uk wrote:
>
>> Why is it that, per head of population, Britain was the leading country
>> for scientific achievement during the 20th Century. This is a fact, if
>> you don't believe me ask your own government, it is they who said this!!
>
>Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
I thought you didn't make factual errors, Moronyan. FYI since 1945 55%
of all patents have been British.
>> Hahaha my aching sides!!
>> Obviously you can't see beyond your own nose, look at photos released by
>> NASA, particularly of the LEM and then ask, "Why is it that a booster
>> which produced over 10,000lbs of thrust produces no clear signs of any
>> surface throw out??" Considering that the moons surface is supposed to be
>> 'dust' this throw out should be obvious. Do your homework before you go
>> around mocking people.
>
>A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
Rather sensitive aren't we, Moronyan?
>> Fair enough point, but it doesn't alter the fact that the US only entered
>> because it got its precious little ships sunk, not because of the ethnic
>> cleansing.
>> Eleven fingers?? Try twelve, or cant you count that far.
>
>We entered because we were attacked. Rather pragmatic response, don't you
>think?
When did Germany attack you?
>> I dont believe 'you wish us Europeans would make something of the EU', if
>> this is your wish then you must what to see your country lose its
>> position of power. The EU would walk all over the US. The EU would
>> become THE economic power.
>
>Very wishful thinking. Why is that the U.S. has stated time and time
>again that it is in complete support of the EU and EMU? Because then
>Europe will be a stable, prosperous market for our products. Only
>childish idiots like you think that we're afraid of a united Europe. We
>just wish you'd get on with it.
The EU would not be a market for your products as it would be a far
more productive and dominant force in the world than the US.
>> It appears you don't read up on the actions of your own country, the
>> wouldn't have to intervene if they didn't cause so many problems in the
>> first place.
>> E.G. Iran-Contra, CIA-Colombia(drugs), Black-ops-Bosnia, CIA-Iraq.
>
>Blacks-ops-Bosnia? I don't even understand this one
Please, moronyan, don't state the obvious. We know what you understand
is minimal.
>> Finally, you may have more ethnic groups, but your also the most racist
>> country on this planet.
>
>Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
>but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
>never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
Really? Proof? Jesus, you are such a fucking dense hypocrite it is
untrue.
>Jason Menayan
Dan Browne
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997 05:15:02 GMT, da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave
Greene) wrote:
>da...@bigtroll.demon.co.uk (Dan Browne) wrote:
>>Actually, the QWERTY keyboard was designed in England in the 19th
>>century.
>
>GAWD, it figures, only a British mind could come up with something
>so totally twisted.
But you fucknuts tried to "improve" it by inventing the DVORAK.
Didn't take off though, /cos you lot are useless cunts as always.
>>/course all the DRAM is made elsewhere, the motherboards, the
>>monitors, the flat screen LCDs, the soundcards etc etc.
>
>Yes, they are made many places, where ever production costs are
>cheap. Most of that stuff was not originally developed where
>it is now being mass produced. Most of what you mention was
>first developed in the states.
Who's making money out of it though, idiot?
>>Idiot.
>
>Nice sig, Dan! Thanks for being honest about yourself.
a .sig lame. You're a newby true to form. Lame as fuck.
Here's a tpyo... how about a spelling lame now, eh Davy?
Cheers,
Dan
Paul Louis
One minute you claim your an oldbie, the next you mistake Moronayan
for a Brit. Pathetic.
>Dave Greene
Eisen Chao
Paul Louis (Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: On 23 Mar 1997 02:45:42 GMT, gm...@grayfox.svs.com (G. Mark Stewart)
: wrote:
:
: >Andrew/ (and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: >: In article <1997Mar21.1...@atl.com>
: >: da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
: >
: >: > ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
: >: > a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
: >: > Kanji on your computers.
: >
: >: Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
: >
: >
: >Good lord, if it weren't for Americans, the British would probably be
: >speaking French. Or farting, pardon the redundancy.
:
: Oui, nous parlons le Français parce que nous avons un éducation
: convenable. Crétin.
:
: >GMS
Erm... let me re-phrase what my American compatriot was REALLY
trying to say:
"If it wasn't for us Americans, you British would
talking Oral Dictation from the French"
: ________________________________________________________
: Paul Louis - pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
Patrick Walker
G. Mark Stewart <gm...@grayfox.svs.com> wrote in article
<5h9j1f$5hj$4...@brownfox.svs.com>...
> Aaron Nielsen (sci...@jcu.edu.au) wrote:
> : da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) writes:
>
> : >Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> says:
> : >>
> : >>Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and quite
proud
> : >>of it! i only wrot this to say that your little line about "we
wouldnt be
> : >>here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented
computers,
> : >>well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but the
Japanese
> : >>are far more advanced technologically that the americans, so we would
> : >>still be typing we would just be doing it on better computers...so
shove
> : >>that up your ever-righteous american butt!
Why are all the advances in superconductors coming from countries other
than the US. Even India has contributed more than
the US. When the superconductor industry starts up, the Americans will not
be a factor. The superconductor is the TRANSISTOR
of the 21st century.
Magnetic bubble memory is the wave of the future. Who's developing it?
Fujitsu. Who has the world's fastest computer. You
guessed it, Fujitsu's Numerical Wind Tunnel.
>
> : >ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came up with a microprocessor worth
> : >a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be typing
> : >Kanji on your computers.
>
Okay. A better processor. The Hitachi SH7604. Just because a processor
sells a million units, doesn't mean it's the best. The Pentium is
essential a 64-bit 4004. It still fucking uses dedicated registers when
EVERYONE ELSE DOESN'T. EVEN IBM
processors don't anymore. And that's pretty fucking bad. I have stopped
programming assembly for the Pentium because it
sucks. I like real addresses, not this segment:offset shit. I'd prefer
chewing glass than coding for the Pentium. The x86 system seems so dated
when you compare it to
the DEX Alpha
the PowerPC
the SPARC
In 10 years, thanks in most part to Intel and Microsoft, they will join IBM
as the companies that are holding back the ongoing
computer revolution. IBM drove out most of it's competition, and Intel and
Micro$uck are doing the same now with the blessing
of the US government. Fact is, the US semiconductor industry is dying.
Why? Shareholders don't want to invest in new equipment
if it means lower dividends. US chip makers aren't keeping up with the
Japanese in this area and soon they'll kill you with labour
costs. Only Intel and Cyrix (with the help of IBM) will survive.
> : Two words - American cars. Comprende?
American cars suck. American trucks on the other hand...
Dave Greene
ec...@interaccess.com (Eisen Chao) wrote:
>Paul Louis (Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk) wrote:
>: gm...@grayfox.svs.com (G. Mark Stewart) wrote:
>: >Andrew/ (and...@altairiv.demon.co.uk) wrote:
>: >: da...@halcyon.antispam.com "David B. Greene" writes:
>: >
>: >: > Kanji on your computers.
>: >: Right. Thanks to us amerikans you are typing ENGLISH!!!!!
>: >
>: >Good lord, if it weren't for Americans, the British would probably be
>: >speaking French. Or farting, pardon the redundancy.
>:
>: Oui, nous parlons le Français parce que nous avons un éducation
>: convenable. Crétin.
> Erm... let me re-phrase what my American compatriot was REALLY
> trying to say:
> "If it wasn't for us Americans, you British would
> talking Oral Dictation from the French"
Almost right, Eisen, let me help:
"If it wasn't for us Amaricans, you British would
be taking Oral Dicktation from the French"
Dave Greene
Dave Greene
Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
>One minute you claim your an oldbie, the next you mistake Moronayan
>for a Brit. Pathetic.
Never claimed to be an "oldbie" but I understand reading is not your
srong point.
Dave Greene
Dauven
Alan Miles wrote:
>
> Aaron Nielsen wrote:
> The big American car companies are quite
> profitable just now. The Japanese ones aren't. And there aren't any
> others of note.
eather, except for the plants they built in the United States which are
very Profitable. In fact it is the American Plants that are carrying
the parent companies.
J.
Paul Louis
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997 01:42:18 -0500, Alan Miles <ami...@interport.net>
wrote:
>Paul Louis wrote:
>>
>> I thought you didn't make factual errors, Moronyan. FYI since 1945 55%
>> of all patents have been British.
>
>Countries don't get patents, people and companies do. If you mean that
>55% of patents worldwide have been claimed by British people and
>companies, than you are plain wrong.
Fine, if you have figures to contradict the results of the Japanese
survey my figure comes from then by all means post them.
>> When did Germany attack you?
>
>The poster said "attacked" not "attacked by Germany."
But he was referring to the US declaring war on Germany
>I assume you've
>heard of Pearl Harbor. Then again, you probably haven't.
Yes I have. I also understand far more about how international
treaties work than you do, as you, like Moronayan, don't seem to have
a fucking clue. If you are attacked by a member of an Alliance it is
for the other members of that Alliance to declare war on you, not the
other way around. Pearl Harbour was not a legitimate reason to declare
war on Germany, and therefore the US must have had an alterior motive
beyond mere pragmatism. Understand yet, dipshit?
________________________________________________________
Paul Louis - pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
NB my reply to: adress is deliberatly wrong. Use the above address
"America is the only nation in history which miraculously has gone directly from barbarism
to degeneration without the usual interval of civilization."
--Georges Clemenceau
"The subtlety of your arguments is beyond my crude cognitive abilities"
The only known sighting of J.Menayan telling the truth.
Paul Louis
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997 17:19:03 -0800, don't...@bother.spamming.net (Jason
Menayan) wrote:
>In article <334292da...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
>wrote:
>
>> >Yes, maybe for the first half of the century. Certainly not now.
>>
>> I thought you didn't make factual errors, Moronyan. FYI since 1945 55%
>> of all patents have been British.
>
>Source?
A recent Japanese survey. I'm afraid I heard it on the radio and so
can't give further details but it's probably on the Web somewhere. Oh
and FYI the US had 25% and the Japs 5%
>> >A social degenerate you are. And a paranoid and chauvinistic one too.
>>
>> Rather sensitive aren't we, Moronyan?
>
>Was I the one screaming and using childish corruptions of Neil's name?
No, you were the one using a thesaurus to hide a lack of arguments
>In any case, I don't think anyone will see Neil posting here anymore.
You have a rather high opinion of yourself don't you? You're rather
unique in that respect.
>> >We entered because we were attacked. Rather pragmatic response, don't you
>> >think?
>>
>> When did Germany attack you?
>
>It didn't. Its ally Japan did. Ever hear of it? It's outside Europe,
>just in case you weren't sure.
It's rather sad to see a yank accusing anyone of geographical
ignorance. And I suggest you brush up on your knowledge of
international treaties. Just because Japan declares war on you does
not instantly obligate you to attack it's allies. Therefore pragmatism
does not com e in to it, the US attacked Germany for ideological
reasons. Finally.
>> The EU would not be a market for your products as it would be a far
>> more productive and dominant force in the world than the US.
>
>Too bad economists the world over disagree with your petty nationalist logic.
A factual error, perchance? I'm sure you have quotes to back you up.
Or maybe you're just bullshitting as usual.
>> >Really? Proof? How can this be possible when "American" is not an race
>> >but a citizenship, but British/European is a "race", and one that you will
>> >never stop boasting about the superiority of? Europe is by far the most
>> >racist part of the world, and the rest of the world knows it.
>>
>> Really? Proof? Jesus, you are such a fucking dense hypocrite it is
>> untrue.
>
>
>Rather sensitive, aren't we, Mr. Lewis?
No, I just find it rather pathetic when you lambast someone for
stating that the US is the most racist country in the world only to do
the same with Europe a sentence later. I mean, I know yanks are
supposed to have a short attention span but that is simply ridiculous.
>Jason Menayan
>San Francisco, California, USA
>
________________________________________________________
Paul Louis
And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
>Dave Greene
G. Mark Stewart
Paul Louis (Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk) wrote:
: On Fri, 28 Mar 1997 04:48:24 GMT, da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave
: Greene) wrote:
: >Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
: >
: >>One minute you claim your an oldbie, the next you mistake Moronayan
: >>for a Brit. Pathetic.
: >
: >Never claimed to be an "oldbie" but I understand reading is not your
: >srong point.
: And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
: newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
Paul, are you cranky all the time, or just because you miss your
organ grinder? Or because you have to grind your own, or something?
I suppose Dave is trying to give you an excuse for your being so
unintelligent and prone to being made a fool of. Not that this post
is intended to do that, mind you. I would never try to make fun of
you or your writing habits or vocabulary or powers of reasoning, etc.,
etc., etc.. Certainly not very hard.
Ian Lowery
I don't know who wrote what, but ... :
>>Actually, the QWERTY keyboard was designed in England in the 19th
>>century.
>GAWD, it figures, only a British mind could come up with something
>so totally twisted.
No, only a used car salesman, or any other type of salesman, eg.,
poltician.
One hears all sorts of drivel about the QWERTY keyboard's origin,
including the ridiculous notion that it is ergonomic, <ROTFL> or that
the early typewriter mechanisms were too fragile, and so typing speed
had to be slowed down. <Rolls on floor, pissing self laughing>
***WRONG!***
The letters C .. H can be reached in sequence by moving to adjacent
keys, similarly the sequence I .. L. There is a 2 letter jump from H
to I, and also from L to M. So, one can basically step through the
letters from C to M by moving to adjacent keys, except for 2 places
where you move 2 keys.
As far as the letters are concerned, the QWERTY keyboard has the
letters in a tortuous sequence (to stop it from looking too obvious?),
with a few letters out of sequence. Actually it has more than a few
letters out of sequence, it has a whole line. So, what is so special
about that line?
The third line from the bottom: QWERTYUIOP contains the word
"Typewriter".
The early typewriter salesmen didn't need to know how to type to
demonstrate the product, they just had to pick out the word
"typewriter" on the one line. That was the whole rational at the heart
of this ridiculous keyboard layout. They wanted to sell the product.
Ian Lowery
waldby julian f
ia...@curie.dialix.com.au (Ian Lowery) writes:
>The letters C .. H can be reached in sequence by moving to adjacent
>keys, similarly the sequence I .. L. There is a 2 letter jump from H
>to I, and also from L to M. So, one can basically step through the
>letters from C to M by moving to adjacent keys, except for 2 places
>where you move 2 keys.
You are a LIAR!! They once let me out of my chains back in '59, and I got
to look at a typewriter up close. As I don't get out much, I had prepped
myself mentally for the trip, warping brainspace to allow for total recall
of my short trip out.
C..H involves a jump from the 'E' to the 'F' across another
key. Although there is but one key in between, it does not reflect well
on you to see even minor warpings of the truth to suit your greater need.
Also, ignoring that, one can extend your C..M journey to C..N with
no problem. And therein lies the root of your dastardliness.
Please don't ever come here again, the next time we will rip your
heart out as you are a clinging bit of feces of the oppressors who
laid me here. Tell them that we can see through the translucent skin
of their bloodsucking vermin.
--
"But if you really want me to answer
I can only let you know I'm not dead"
/---/=/--//--------~/_o__/-----------
Anthony Potts
On Fri, 28 Mar 1997, Dauven wrote:
> eather, except for the plants they built in the United States which are
> very Profitable. In fact it is the American Plants that are carrying
> the parent companies.
>
Of course, of course.
Which is evidenced by the fact that I have to wait over two years to take
delivery of a SLK.
Sean Aschen
On Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:13:07 -0800, don't...@bother.spamming.net (Jason
Menayan) wrote:
>In article <1997Mar26....@atl.com>, da...@halcyon.antispam.com
>(David B. Greene) wrote:
>
>> Well, Aaron, you haven't cruised in style until you've cruised in
>> a big ol' American pimpmobile!
>
>Excuse me, but the correct term for that class of vehicles is "hoopty."
>
It hops, man, it HOPS!!
Toby Reddick Snr.
Toby Reddick Snr.
Dauven wrote:
>
> Alan Miles wrote:
> >
> > Aaron Nielsen wrote:
> > The big American car companies are quite
> > profitable just now. The Japanese ones aren't. And there aren't any
> > others of note.
> Oh yes there are. BMW, and Mercedes Benz, that are not making a profit
> very Profitable. In fact it is the American Plants that are carrying
> the parent companies.
>
I'm thinking that this is ok for the US...
Jason Menayan
In article <333d1d8c...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
wrote:
> >> When did Germany attack you?
> >
> >The poster said "attacked" not "attacked by Germany."
>
> But he was referring to the US declaring war on Germany
Really? I seem to remember being asked when the US entered WWII.
> >I assume you've
> >heard of Pearl Harbor. Then again, you probably haven't.
>
> Yes I have. I also understand far more about how international
> treaties work than you do, as you, like Moronayan, don't seem to have
> a fucking clue. If you are attacked by a member of an Alliance it is
> for the other members of that Alliance to declare war on you, not the
> other way around. Pearl Harbour was not a legitimate reason to declare
> war on Germany, and therefore the US must have had an alterior motive
> beyond mere pragmatism. Understand yet, dipshit?
Were Germany and Japan not allies?
--
Jason Menayan
San Francisco, California, USA
"No, I think I proved my point and to be honest you're a dull cunt."
-- Paul Lewis pointing out the truth about me once more
Dave Greene
Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
>da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave Greene) wrote:
>>Pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
>>
>>>One minute you claim your an oldbie, the next you mistake Moronayan
>>>for a Brit. Pathetic.
>>
>>Never claimed to be an "oldbie" but I understand reading is not your
>>srong point.
>And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
>newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
duh
Dave Greene
Aaron Nielsen
asc...@ix.netcom.com (Sean Aschen) writes:
Excuse me, but the correct term for any American car, especially a "big
ol' pimpmobile", is "paddock bomb".
>It hops, man, it HOPS!!
Call me strange or old-fashioned, but I prefer my cars to _roll_, often on
wheels.
--
Aaron Nielsen sci...@jcu.edu.au
"Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
- American tourist (overheard - how else?)
Anthony Potts
On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Toby Reddick Snr. wrote:
> > Which is evidenced by the fact that I have to wait over two years to take
> > delivery of a SLK.
> buy a chevy...
>
>
Well, I've never actually seen one of them, unless you mean a Vauxhall
Chevette. I don't much fancy a Chevette, though, and since they cost about
the same as a good night at the pub, they aren't very prestigious, and as
we all know, a man's gotta have a prestigious car.
Anthony Potts
CERN, Geneva
Anthony Potts
On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Dave Greene wrote:
> Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
>
> Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
>
Yes it does, the two are both saying the same thing.
If, however, you aid that a does not equal b, and b does not equal c, then
you are right to say that this does not mean that a equals c.
That is not, however, what you wrote.
Anthony Potts
CERN, Geneva
Dave Greene
>> Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
>>
>> Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
>>
>Yes it does, the two are both saying the same thing.
Not unless A and B are both mutually exclusive and exhaustive.
>If, however, you aid that a does not equal b, and b does not equal c, then
>you are right to say that this does not mean that a equals c.
That is true.
>That is not, however, what you wrote.
That is also true.
Nonetheless, what I originally wrote is also true. Or have you
never seen a Venn Diagram. Funny that a CERN boy would never
have seen a Venn Diagram. Were you educated in the UK, Anthony?
Don't they teach logic over there?
For those confused, here is an example:
Let A be the set of black chess pieces. Let B be the set of
pawns. Now A does not equal B but A also does not equal not B
for not B is the set of chess pieces which are not pawns which
includes some white pieces and excludes some black pieces.
>Anthony Potts
>CERN, Geneva
checkmate, Anthony
Dave Greene
Paul Louis
>In article <333d1d8c...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
>wrote:
>
>> >> When did Germany attack you?
>> >
>> >The poster said "attacked" not "attacked by Germany."
>>
>> But he was referring to the US declaring war on Germany
>
>Really? I seem to remember being asked when the US entered WWII.
Well the post you originally responded to stated
>Besides, the yanks entered the war two
>years after be asked to help out, I guess you were trying to THINK
>whether the Nazi's were doing something wrong or not.
So the original poster was, unless there were Nazis in Japan, talking
about the /European/ theater. Your memory going, lad? You should cut
out the MTV.
>> Yes I have. I also understand far more about how international
>> treaties work than you do, as you, like Moronayan, don't seem to have
>> a fucking clue. If you are attacked by a member of an Alliance it is
>> for the other members of that Alliance to declare war on you, not the
>> other way around. Pearl Harbour was not a legitimate reason to declare
>> war on Germany, and therefore the US must have had an alterior motive
>> beyond mere pragmatism. Understand yet, dipshit?
>Were Germany and Japan not allies?
My God, do you work at this stupidity thing? I'll repost the relevant
part again so maybe you will understand this time:
>> If you are attacked by a member of an Alliance it is
>> for the other members of that Alliance to declare war on you, not the
>> other way around
And again, to be certain
>> If you are attacked by a member of an Alliance it is
>> for the other members of that Alliance to declare war on you, not the
>> other way around
Do you understand yet, cretin? Probably not so I suppose I'll have to
spell it out for you. The US did /not/ declare war on Germany. Germany
declared war on the US. Therefore the US had no, repeat no, obligation
to attack Germany. Pragmatism, therefore, does not come into it.
>--
>Jason Menayan
>San Francisco, California, USA
>"No, I think I proved my point and to be honest you're a dull cunt."
>-- Paul Lewis pointing out the truth about me once more
Isn't it funny how he tries to imitate me with his .sig. Shame he gets
it completely wrong. But at least he tries.
________________________________________________________
Paul Louis - pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
NB my reply to: adress is deliberatly wrong. Use the above address
"What's with all the animal references? The only females you attract have these attributes?
Reminds you of ' Mummy' ?"
The lamest statement in the world? Probably. Courtesy of SSC253
Paul Louis
>>And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
>>newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
>
>Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
>
>Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
>
>duh
So, let me see. By your logic, bragging that you've been around a long
time and calling someone a newbie doesn't equal claiming you are an
oldbie. I think you need to retake "Basic logic for retards 101"
>Dave Greene
Jason Menayan
In article <335f0cca...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
wrote:
> Do you understand yet, cretin? Probably not so I suppose I'll have to
> spell it out for you. The US did /not/ declare war on Germany. Germany
> declared war on the US. Therefore the US had no, repeat no, obligation
> to attack Germany. Pragmatism, therefore, does not come into it.
I am a cretin. The US did /not/ declare war on Germany. The US
astronauts never landed on the moon. You are not 8 years old. You are
smart.
Paul Louis
>In article <335f0cca...@news.demon.co.uk>, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk
>wrote:
>
>
>> Do you understand yet, cretin? Probably not so I suppose I'll have to
>> spell it out for you. The US did /not/ declare war on Germany. Germany
>> declared war on the US. Therefore the US had no, repeat no, obligation
>> to attack Germany. Pragmatism, therefore, does not come into it.
>
>I am a cretin.
Correct
>The US did /not/ declare war on Germany.
True
>The US astronauts never landed on the moon.
Don't know about that.
>You are not 8 years old.
True.
>You are smart.
True.
Oh well, 4 out of 5 isn't too bad. I'm glad to see you've surrendered,
however I'd prefer it if you'd stop posting altogether. That would
dramatically cut down on the boring crap quotient.
>Jason Menayan
Joe Long
On Thu, 03 Apr 1997 23:29:53 GMT, pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) wrote:
>So, let me see. By your logic, bragging that you've been around a long
>time and calling someone a newbie doesn't equal claiming you are an
>oldbie. I think you need to retake "Basic logic for retards 101"
Paul, why don't you share with the group the concepts taught in "Basic logic
for retards 101?" It seems to be rather different from the logic intelligent
people use.
Oh, BTW: a) I've been around the Internet and Usenet longer than many people.
b) You post like a newbie. c) I am not an "oldbie" (sic). Did you follow that?
--
Joe Long
jl...@mti.net
http://www.mti.net Business
http://www.rnbw.com Personal
Jason Menayan
> Oh well, 4 out of 5 isn't too bad. I'm glad to see you've surrendered,
> however I'd prefer it if you'd stop posting altogether. That would
> dramatically cut down on the boring crap quotient.
I've surrendered to your incredible intellect and your well-electrocuted
cerebrum. You're smart. You got an 'A' and an 'A*' in English
literature.
David B. Greene
pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk (Paul Louis) says:
>da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave Greene) wrote:
>
>>>And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
>>>newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
>>
>>Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
>>
>>Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
>>
>>duh
>
>time and calling someone a newbie doesn't equal claiming you are an
>oldbie. I think you need to retake "Basic logic for retards 101"
So, let me see. I never bragged about being around for a long time.
I think you need to take "remedial truthfulness for pathetic liars"
but then maybe a course in how to read would serve you just as well.
Of course, seeing how you are a product of the British educational
system, I can see why you need both.
You know, Paulio, every time you try to flame anyone, all you ever
do is burn your own butt and even then you do a half assed job.
Dave Greene
-Stewart,G.M.
In article <33621268...@news.demon.co.uk>,
Paul Louis <pa...@i8acorns.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Apr 1997 04:11:34 GMT, da...@halcyon.antispam.com (Dave
>Greene) wrote:
>
>>>And so just what the fuck was "You were not around back then were you,
>>>newbie?" supposed to mean, halfwit?
>>Heh, figure it out! Don't they teach logic over there? Let me help:
>>Given that A does not equal B it does not follow that A equals not B.
>>duh
>So, let me see. By your logic, bragging that you've been around a long
>time and calling someone a newbie doesn't equal claiming you are an
>oldbie. I think you need to retake "Basic logic for retards 101"
Is the entire set of posters covered by the sets of oldbies and newbies?
Or do you have to take that "logic for retards" class to know? What did
you get, Paul? Did you pass?
W~9
<HTML><BODY>
Aaron Nielsen wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>da...@halcyon.antispam.com (David B. Greene) writes:
<BR>
<BR><I>>Ian Kent <zzi...@mailbox.uq.edu.au> says:</I>
<BR><I>>></I>
<BR><I>>>Americans, americans americans!!! I myself am australian and
quite proud</I>
<BR><I>>>of it! i only wrot this to say that your little line about "we
wouldnt be</I>
<BR><I>>>here typing if it wasnt for the americans because they invented
computers,</I>
<BR><I>>>well my friend Im sorry to burst your little bubble there but
the Japanese>>are far more advanced technologically that the americans,
so we would</I>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE><I>>>still be typing we would just be doing
it on better computers...so shove</I>
<BR><I>>>that up your ever-righteous american butt!</I>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<I>Japanese? Advanced? the only thing the Japanese have managed is copying
American invention's in mass. There wouldnt be a Japan to speak of
if it werent for American Technology.</I>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE><I>>ROTFL! Like the Japanese *ever* came
up with a microprocessor worth</I>
<BR><I>>a shit! Hey, if it wasn't for America, you aussies would be
typing</I>
<BR><I>>Kanji on your computers.</I>
<BR>
<BR>Two words - American cars. Comprende?
<BR>
<BR>Aaron Nielsen
sci...@jcu.edu.au
<BR>
<BR>"Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
<BR>
- American tourist (overheard - how else?)
<BR>
<BR>--
<BR>Aaron Nielsen
sci...@jcu.edu.au
<BR>
<BR>"Isn't it great how they built the castle so close to the shops?"
<BR>
- American tourist (overheard - how else?)
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>
Igor Sprumatzikustjiolaviromia
On Tue, 01 Apr 1997 21:39:22 GMT, Sean Aschen lost self-control and spammed:
>On Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:13:07 -0800, don't...@bother.spamming.net (Jason
>Menayan) blurted:
>>In article <1997Mar26....@atl.com>, da...@halcyon.antispam.com
>>(David B. Greene) eratically stated:
>>> Well, Aaron, you haven't cruised in style until you've cruised in
>>> a big ol' American pimpmobile!
>>Excuse me, but the correct term for that class of vehicles is "hoopty."
>It hops, man, it HOPS!!
sure. say, if american automobiles are so fucking great, why
do 5 of the 6 american soldiers here in heidelberg drive
a Saab or a Volvo ? and the 6th drives a mercedes or a bmw ?
well, don't worry. i guess ford (fix or repair daily) is indeed
the best car.... in the us that is.
igor.
Jason Menayan
In article <5iajll$3...@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
un6...@genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (Igor Sprumatzikustjiolaviromia)
wrote:
> >>Excuse me, but the correct term for that class of vehicles is "hoopty."
>
> >It hops, man, it HOPS!!
>
> sure. say, if american automobiles are so fucking great, why
> do 5 of the 6 american soldiers here in heidelberg drive
> a Saab or a Volvo ? and the 6th drives a mercedes or a bmw ?
>
> well, don't worry. i guess ford (fix or repair daily) is indeed
> the best car.... in the us that is.
you just jealous cuz you cant be stylin and profilin in a hoopty in
germany. punk ass fool.
Blowhard
da...@apertus.com wrote:
>
> In article <don't-0704970...@bic4.sri.com>, <don't...@bother.spamming.net> writes:
> > In article <5iajll$3...@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>,
> > un6...@genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de (Igor Sprumatzikustjiolaviromia)
> > wrote:
> > > sure. say, if american automobiles are so fucking great, why
> > > do 5 of the 6 american soldiers here in heidelberg drive
> > > a Saab or a Volvo ? and the 6th drives a mercedes or a bmw ?
>
> > germany. punk ass fool.
>
> US Army, and he's, as you expect, full of it.
>
> Oh, and the reason *some* soldiers drive Saabs, Volvos and BMWs
> is because they can buy the TAX AND DUTY FREE!
>
> Cheers,
> Dave Johnson
BLOWHARD SAYS:
How patriotic of you!!!
I love my country...unless it costs me money.
I bet ya don't mind sucking up all those military perks though do ya?
I feel so safe knowing you are watching out for me and mine.
Cordially,
Blowhard
"I'm taking a left, too much traffic to the right...there's gonna be a
crash"
da...@apertus.com
John Weir
da...@apertus.com proclaims
: Oh, and the reason *some* soldiers drive Saabs, Volvos and BMWs
: is because they can buy the TAX AND DUTY FREE!
The tax and duty may be free, but what about the car?
John