Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

stan, in tears .

1 view
Skip to first unread message

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Feb 8, 2003, 7:32:55 PM2/8/03
to
"Stan de SD" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:5Ug1a.6683$1q2.6...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net:

> "james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns931CC096CDE2F...@130.133.1.4...
>> "Stan de SD" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote in
>> news:ttf1a.6548$1q2.6...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net:
>>
>> >> > I have something to bring to the table that most of you don't
>> >>
>> >> and that "something" is so ugly that readers both pity you and
>> >> wish you would go away.
>> >
>> > You mean, it is of substance and not easily refuted
>>
>> you can hardly express your own intent much less that of someone else
>> child.
>
> I have expressed it quite clearly,

denial isn't healthy, child. your pathetic protestations convince no one.

go away, stamp your foot, cry a little.

Stan de SD

unread,
Feb 8, 2003, 7:38:26 PM2/8/03
to

"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns931CC6D865AF6...@130.133.1.4...

I'm sticking around. It livens up the group and pisses you off at the same
time, two worthy causes. :O)

(BTW, I noticed all you can do is respond with little girl-like snips. Are
you too afraid to even discuss the ISSUE of homelessness? Appears that
way...)


james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Feb 8, 2003, 8:00:11 PM2/8/03
to
"Stan de SD" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:6qh1a.6762$1q2.6...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net:

>> go away, stamp your foot, cry a little.
>
> I'm sticking around.

go ahead then, use some new makeup and lipstick. maybe someone will notice
you.

Stan de SD

unread,
Feb 8, 2003, 8:37:25 PM2/8/03
to

"james g. keegan jr." <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Xns931CCB77D95BB...@130.133.1.4...

I noticed how obsessed you are with me. You're obviously upset with my
presence, and what I have to say. However, it's also quite clear that you
lack the intellectual abilities to actually debate any of the issues I
present. Once again, the impression that you're swayed more by emotion than
reason, is reinforced.


Kent Paul Dolan

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 2:21:10 AM2/9/03
to
"Stan de SD" <stan...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> (BTW, I noticed all you can do is respond with little girl-like snips. Are
> you too afraid to even discuss the ISSUE of homelessness? Appears that
> way...)

Umm, Stan, your functional illiteracy is showing again. He quite
clearly stated early on that he was posting to discuss _your boorish
behavior_, not homeless issues, in which he quite possibly has no
interest whatever.

See, the problem is that _no one_ can discuss the issues with you,
because you only do monologues, not dialogs. At every point where you
are proved incorrect, which is, essentially, at every point you make,
you immediately ignore the issue you were discussing and change the
subject. I've highlighted this behavior over and over in your
postings, and, surprise, you've changed the subject.

I, personally, enjoy debates with imbeciles because I like making
morons like you show up in their true colors. Most human beings of
more normal proclevities, and several of them have already made the
point here, think that the only sufficient treatment of jerks like you
is shunning.

They may be right, but hey, _I'm_ still having fun, and you still
haven't caught on that my intention is to ruin you as a person and as
a participant in Usenet, because I just enjoy watching you and morons
like you suffer and collapse; your removal from the gene pool improves
the species. And in my social and economic circumstances, you don't
have a single effective reply, and every time you attempt to reply,
you are just falling deeper into my trap.

Heh!

xanthian, noticing that Stan's been posting for two minutes shy of
eight hours now, not the "45 minutes around dinner" he claimed, and
certainly not the behavior of a normal person; welcome to my life,
Stan, and you soon joining it. _God_ I love stupid people.

"Best of luck" indeed, Stan, I hope you've been taking good notes on
how to survive as a homeless person.

How many want to take bets I've got more money in the bank than Stan
does? When he falls, it should be swift.

zbranigan

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 11:55:11 AM2/9/03
to
>>>>> "Stan" == Stan de SD <stan...@earthlink.net> writes:

Stan> I noticed how obsessed you are with me. You're obviously
Stan> upset with my presence, and what I have to say.

I guess that the truth is out. Hey Stan, how about giving
me a blow job?

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 12:06:55 PM2/9/03
to
zbranigan <zbra...@volcanomail.com> wrote in
news:7olm0pq...@stkitts.pacbell.net:

i think he likes kpd best.

Stan de SD

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 5:26:28 PM2/9/03
to

"zbranigan" <zbra...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:7olm0pq...@stkitts.pacbell.net...

How about having me punch your lights out, if you wish me to make a
proposition in the same vein?

Proof we have another loser who can't debate the issues....


NZane

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 6:49:50 PM2/9/03
to

Reality check: Threatening to punch someone's lights out is not the
same as debating an issue. Only cowards and those out of options for
debate resort to these kind of immature threats!

I may sling a few ugly words around.. but that's all they are .. words.

Stan de SD

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 6:58:03 PM2/9/03
to

"NZane" <nz...@hotsprgs.net> wrote in message
news:3E46E91E...@hotsprgs.net...

>
>
> Stan de SD wrote:
> > "zbranigan" <zbra...@volcanomail.com> wrote in message
> > news:7olm0pq...@stkitts.pacbell.net...
> >
> >>>>>>>"Stan" == Stan de SD <stan...@earthlink.net> writes:
> >>>>>>
> >> Stan> I noticed how obsessed you are with me. You're obviously
> >> Stan> upset with my presence, and what I have to say.
> >>
> >>I guess that the truth is out. Hey Stan, how about giving
> >>me a blow job?
> >
> >
> > How about having me punch your lights out, if you wish me to make a
> > proposition in the same vein?
> >
> > Proof we have another loser who can't debate the issues....
>
> Reality check: Threatening to punch someone's lights out is not the
> same as debating an issue.

Go re-read the statement above, since you obviously took it out of context.
What do you suppose the comment "if you wish me to make a proposition in the
same vein?" means? Go look up "rhetorical response" some time - you may
learn something...

> Only cowards and those out of options for
> debate resort to these kind of immature threats!

Thanks for resorting to the classic liberal argument of deliberately
misconstruing comments and tilting at windmills. So show us where you have
engaged in any reasoned debate on the subject matter (homelessness). You
haven't, simply because you can't. Therefore, you will play your silly games
to divert attention from your inability to constructively engage in
discourse.

NZane

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 7:15:30 PM2/9/03
to

HHahha what does punching lights out have to do with a blow job? Out
of contexts my ass! Double talking idiots crack me up.. Shit Stanley..
I can almost see some entertainment value in you .. almost :)

Stan de SD

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 7:45:27 PM2/9/03
to

"NZane" <nz...@hotsprgs.net> wrote in message
news:3E46EF2...@hotsprgs.net...

Proving you're more interested in playing games. Are you still afraid to
join the threads were we actually discuss homeless issues? Thought so.


NZane

unread,
Feb 9, 2003, 7:54:18 PM2/9/03
to

:) you have no idea how I love playing "the game"
http://erisx.com/nzane/thegame

And no.. I can't see a point talking with you about anything worth a
fuck. I'd rather just laugh at your silly ass.

I don't use alt.homeless whatever.. I joined talk.bizarre just for a
laugh.. and you haven't disappointed me! The only thing sadder than
your lame attitude is my poor limp dick! Somehow I manage to get some
amusement out of both :)

0 new messages