Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

One More Chorus Before I Go....

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew F. Hampe

unread,
Mar 11, 1991, 9:13:00 AM3/11/91
to
In article <621...@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>, bi...@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill
nelson) writes:
|> ha...@nas.nasa.gov (Andrew F. Hampe) / 10:32 am Mar 3, 1991 / writes:
|>
|> >Abortion is Murder
|> >Murder is Illegal
|>
|> >Therefore ABORTION IS ILLEGAL
|>
|> Sorry Andrew. It is only you opinion that abortion is murder. It is not
|> a proven fact.

But Bill Suzanne Forgach has Told us that abortion is Murder
and hence it must be true,


And How do WE Know She is Right????


All together Happy Campers...

Because Suzanne was a Fetus!!!!


Heil FEtus! Heil Fetus! Heil Fetus!!!!


Thus Bill You have been Denounced and PROVEN WRONG!

Were it not for the SeXular Humanism that has Corrupted
your Mind you would also KNOW that it is true! Hence
Also that Abortion is Illegal, Regardless what all the
BleeedingHeartWimpLiberals and Their Media Stooges try
to tell you OtherWise!

When You too Have Come to OneNess with Suzanne Foirgashes
Fetal Theology you Too Will Be Enlightended and Know the
One and TRUE TRUTH!!!! The Scales will fall from your Eyes
and Onto Your Toes, and You will Bounce around With One
Foot in Your Hand as You Chant the Mantra of the Falling Scales!


ciao
drieux

William Henry Timmins

unread,
Mar 11, 1991, 7:58:11 PM3/11/91
to
Yes, it's been said before, but...

why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
punishment?


-Me

Why IS the pentagon the shape it is?

Loren Petrich

unread,
Mar 11, 1991, 8:52:44 PM3/11/91
to
In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>Yes, it's been said before, but...

>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>punishment?

That's an interesting question.

I put up a whole posting a couple of weeks back about wider
values in abortion, and I address part of that question.

I suspect it is because those who want to ban abortions have a
punitive mentality; they want to punish "wicked" women with unwanted
pregnancies. The difficulty with abortion, as they see it, is that
wicked women can get away with unauthorized sex. To such people, sex
out of marriage is unauthorized sex.

I note that these are the same kinds of people who consider
sex "immoral" while having nothing against violence. A proper set of
priorities would be that sex is good, while violence is bad.

And interesting discussion on why some people seem to believe
in violence as a way of life may be found in Riane Eisler's _The
Chalice and the Blade_. She does not address abortion directly, but
she does discuss many related issues, such as the status of women.


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Loren Petrich, the Master Blaster: lo...@sunlight.llnl.gov

Since this nodename is not widely known, you may have to try:

loren%sunlight...@star.stanford.edu

Crucifixes are sexy because there's a naked man on them -- Madonna

Andrew F. Hampe

unread,
Mar 12, 1991, 8:45:24 AM3/12/91
to
In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu>, wt...@andrew.cmu.edu

(William Henry Timmins) writes:
|> Why IS the pentagon the shape it is?

Five Sided, Pentangle, Ancient Satanic Symbol....

ciao
drieux

ps: but that is all a part of the Secret Christian Conspiracy
to Drive PeaceNiki Into the Moral Quandary about whether or
not they are Tools of the Devil or On God's Side....

Rick Kelly

unread,
Mar 13, 1991, 1:50:00 PM3/13/91
to
In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>
>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>punishment?


It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.

Rick Kelly r...@rmkhome.UUCP frog!rmkhome!rmk r...@frog.UUCP

Glenn Hassel

unread,
Mar 14, 1991, 7:18:49 AM3/14/91
to
In article <9103130831.41@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>>
>>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>>punishment?
>
>
>It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.
>
What is the weight limit for killing them?

>
>Rick Kelly r...@rmkhome.UUCP frog!rmkhome!rmk r...@frog.UUCP
gl...@europa.asd.contel.com

Suzanne Forgach

unread,
Mar 14, 1991, 6:54:00 PM3/14/91
to
From article <9103130831.41@rmkhome.UUCP>, by r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly):

> In article wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>>
>>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>>punishment?
>
> It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.

Then why is it that so many against capital punishment think abortion
of the innocent is just just fine? Like David said, go figure.

John F. Woods

unread,
Mar 14, 1991, 10:41:03 PM3/14/91
to

Because fetuses aren't thinking, rational creatures. Just like you.

Edward J Lorden

unread,
Mar 14, 1991, 11:28:05 PM3/14/91
to

This is not true. The Catholic Church, as everyone knows, is one of the
most vocal opponents to abortion yet it is against capital punishment.
What about the history of the Church? Inquisition? etc? Well, can't the
people change when they find out they are mistaken? (The Church subscribes
to what is known as a Consistent Life Ethic -- All human life has a right
to exist, once it has come into existence.) Therefore, this statement of
yours is FALSE. (i.e. not true, has no basis in fact, etc.)

As to your second question, the architect wanted to express his
individuality.


Abortion -- "The termination of a pregnancy that results in |
the death of the fetus." | Ed Lorden
American Heritage Dictionary | Wash. U.
| St. Louis, MO

John F. Woods

unread,
Mar 15, 1991, 7:41:07 AM3/15/91
to
In <1991Mar15....@cec1.wustl.edu> ejl...@cec1.wustl.edu (Edward J Lorden) writes:
>This is not true. The Catholic Church, as everyone knows, is one of the
>most vocal opponents to abortion yet it is against capital punishment.

Due to laws against open-air bonfires, mostly. Of course, the Catholic Church
is against all recreational sex, and wants to ensure an earthly punishment just
in case their ideas of the afterlife don't pan out.

>What about the history of the Church? Inquisition? etc? Well, can't the
>people change when they find out they are mistaken?

Let's see, is "The Starry Messenger" off the Index, yet?

Glenn Hassell

unread,
Mar 15, 1991, 7:05:32 AM3/15/91
to
In article <1991Mar15....@cec1.wustl.edu>, ejl...@cec1.wustl.edu (Edward J Lorden) writes:
>In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>>
>>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>>punishment?
>>
>>
>>-Me
>>
>>Why IS the pentagon the shape it is?
>
>This is not true. The Catholic Church, as everyone knows, is one of the
>most vocal opponents to abortion yet it is against capital punishment.

But many Catholics are for capital punishment.



>What about the history of the Church? Inquisition? etc? Well, can't the
>people change when they find out they are mistaken? (The Church subscribes
>to what is known as a Consistent Life Ethic -- All human life has a right
>to exist, once it has come into existence.) Therefore, this statement of
>yours is FALSE. (i.e. not true, has no basis in fact, etc.)

Read the statement again, it was refering to people not a church.

Andrew F. Hampe

unread,
Mar 17, 1991, 7:45:29 AM3/17/91
to
If there is AnyThing I HATE to see it is one of my
SubjectLines Wandering Around the Neighborhood without
anything in it related to where the subject was wandering off towards the edge.


ciao
drieux


ps: If You were able to open up your window you would have been able to
read where it went after the wordRap Snapped and went barking off after
the cat *

Rick Kelly

unread,
Mar 16, 1991, 2:54:00 AM3/16/91
to
In article <1991Mar14.0...@europa.asd.contel.com> gl...@ludwigasd.contel.com (Glenn Hassel) writes:
>In article <9103130831.41@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>>In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu (William Henry Timmins) writes:
>>>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>>>
>>>why are the people who tend to want to ban abortions also for capital
>>>punishment?
>>
>>
>>It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.
>>
>What is the weight limit for killing them?


Well, if you see a 200 pound fetus coming after you, shoot it.

Andrew F. Hampe

unread,
Mar 18, 1991, 6:39:46 AM3/18/91
to
In article <1991Mar17.1...@nas.nasa.gov>, ha...@nas.nasa.gov

(Andrew F. Hampe) writes:
|> If there is AnyThing I HATE to see it is

CrossPostings Between Talk.Bizarre and Talk.Abortion,
I wind Up Sitting around here looking at the [abort]
button on this Xwindowed System, and it makes me
wonder if it will finally end the whole of the Free
world and send us all Safely Back to Planet X, or
Secretly Launch us Deeper into the 8th Dimension!


ciao

John Drieux


ps: It Really is John billbill's Fault
as he and John bc were over Bopping around
the Buckaoo BanZai Charge....


its green, its green, and it ain't THE MACHINE!

Glenn Hassel

unread,
Mar 18, 1991, 9:43:54 AM3/18/91
to
Does not answer the question.

Jim Chagnon

unread,
Mar 18, 1991, 2:42:00 PM3/18/91
to

Could it be that those FOR abortion and against capital punishment
don't believe in taking human life? Whether a foetus is a human being
or not is debatable, but a convict most surely IS.

Those AGAINST abortion but for capital punishment don't give a shit
about human life, as long as its been convicted first.

jcc

....Hope that helps.....

Julie Murphy

unread,
Mar 18, 1991, 6:12:22 PM3/18/91
to

> Posting to talk.abortion is a bit like having a running conversation
> with a herd of dinosaurs. Their brains are small, they're
> essentially extinct, but they just don't know it.}

> And they're BIG and HEAVY and they have a lot of MOMENTUM and once
> they get started walking in a certain direction, NOTHING and I mean
> NOTHING can stop them.
--

> Nihil tam absurde dici potest, quod non dicatur ab aliquo pilosophorum.
> Mark-Jason Dominus m...@central.cis.upenn.edu


STOP them! Hah. You can't even get them to move left or right let alone
stop. You can't even get them to LOOK left or right.

God said it, they believe it and that settles it. Yuch.

--

Ford, I don't think I can take much more of this. | Julie Murphy
I'm going to have a little lie down somewhere. | (913) 684-7614
DentArthurDent | But who ever calls
| when you can Net?

Tommy Kelly

unread,
Mar 19, 1991, 6:22:19 AM3/19/91
to
>In article <9103152135.33@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:

>>Well, if you see a 200 pound fetus coming after you, shoot it.

Every so often, t.a is better for a laugh than rec.humor or eunet.jokes.

This is one such occasion.

Another was Suzanne's recent reply to a question about her husband, a bus, and a pregnant pro-choicer.

I think I'll start a collection

Tommy "still laughing" Kelly

:-)

Andrew F. Hampe

unread,
Mar 19, 1991, 6:36:43 AM3/19/91
to
In article <9103152135.33@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
|> In article <1991Mar14.0...@europa.asd.contel.com>
gl...@ludwigasd.contel.com (Glenn Hassel) writes:
|> >In article <9103130831.41@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick
Kelly) writes:
|> >>In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu
(William Henry Timmins) writes:
|> >>>Yes, it's been said before, but...

[..]
This is a Totally Rude, Tackless and IkkyPoohPer Posting
that REally Should be a Call for alt.sex.boredom,
as Obviously All of the Above have decided that it really
is all Too Boring to Do anymore!

Oh the Angst! The AnneWe! {Not a Bad Lay, really, once you
had her fully wrapped in syrianWrap - but otherwise a seriously
boring young lady when you take the BallGag Out!}

|> >>It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.
|> >>
|> >What is the weight limit for killing them?
|>
|> Well, if you see a 200 pound fetus coming after you, shoot it.

Besides - if you is dealing with a 200Lb Fetus one has a
most complicated socio_Political situation on one's hands.

Most Fetus's join the Labor Movement by at least 100lbs,
and have settled into UseLessManageMintPositions by 150lbs!

Besides there is Most Likely fact that a 200lb fetus is
suffering from some form of Delayed Stress Syndrom!!!

Oh the Cads! The HeartLesslyKruelOnes!


ciao
drieux

chris auman

unread,
Mar 19, 1991, 11:09:10 AM3/19/91
to


In article <1991Mar19....@nas.nasa.gov>, ha...@nas.nasa.gov (Andrew F.


Hampe) says:
>
>In article <9103152135.33@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>|> In article <1991Mar14.0...@europa.asd.contel.com>
>gl...@ludwigasd.contel.com (Glenn Hassel) writes:
>|> >In article <9103130831.41@rmkhome.UUCP>, r...@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick
>Kelly) writes:
>|> >>In article <8br2SXC00...@andrew.cmu.edu> wt...@andrew.cmu.edu
>(William Henry Timmins) writes:
>|> >>>Yes, it's been said before, but...
>
>[..]
>This is a Totally Rude, Tackless and IkkyPoohPer Posting
>that REally Should be a Call for alt.sex.boredom,
>as Obviously All of the Above have decided that it really
>is all Too Boring to Do anymore!
>
>Oh the Angst! The AnneWe! {Not a Bad Lay, really, once you
>had her fully wrapped in syrianWrap - but otherwise a seriously
>boring young lady when you take the BallGag Out!}
>
>|> >>It's like hunting. You can't shoot them if their under weight.
>|> >>
>|> >What is the weight limit for killing them?
>|>
>|> Well, if you see a 200 pound fetus coming after you, shoot it.
>

HEY!!!!!!
200lb fetuses!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUCKING YUMMY!!!!!!!!!!!!

>Besides - if you is dealing with a 200Lb Fetus one has a
>most complicated socio_Political situation on one's hands.
>

YEAH.... I AGREE!!! THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS HOW BEST TO PREPARE
THEM............. ANY SUGGESTIONS?

>Most Fetus's join the Labor Movement by at least 100lbs,
>and have settled into UseLessManageMintPositions by 150lbs!
>

AND AT 175lbs THEY ARE SAID TO HAVE AN EXQUISITE AROMA WHEN
SIMMERING IN A PAN OF PLACENTAL FLUIDS DRAINED FROM THE MOTHER'S
CORPSE THAT THEY WERE RIPPED FROM!!!(MUST BE ONE BIG UGLY MOTHER,HUH?)

>Besides there is Most Likely fact that a 200lb fetus is
>suffering from some form of Delayed Stress Syndrom!!!
>

YEAH, AND THEY ALSO AT THIS TIME START TO DEVELOPE AN AWFUL AROMA DUE TO
INTENSE BLOATING FROM OVERCOOKING.


>Oh the Cads! The HeartLesslyKruelOnes!
>

YEP..... I'M BACK!!!!!!!!


>
>ciao
>drieux
>
p.s.
I WANNA CUM
IN YOUR MUM

**********************************************************
** brought to you courtesy of: **
** **
** OOOO GGGG RRRR EEEEEE **
** O O G G R R E **
** O O G RRRRRR EEEE **
** O O G GGG R R E **
** OOOO GGGG G R R EEEEEE **
** **
** !!!!!!your real father!!!!!! **
** 6 6 **
** 6 6 you tell me i'm not evil 6 6 **
** you tell me i'm not nuts **
** come here boy i'll show you **
** i'll rip out your fucking guts!!! **
** **
** BEWARE!! DEATH COMES STALKING TONIGHT!! **
** **
**********************************************************

Kent Paul Dolan

unread,
Mar 20, 1991, 1:00:54 PM3/20/91
to

Elli...@Frodo.MGH.Harvard.EDU (Deaddog) writes:


> { Posting to talk.abortion is a bit like having a running conversation


> with a herd of dinosaurs. Their brains are small, they're essentially
> extinct, but they just don't know it.}

But you have to see it from the Pro Life point of view, too, to be fair.
Left to reproduce, the current pro-life dinosaur herd shows hope of
evolving and improving. They could become:

* a team of tap-dancing titanotheres in tutus touting the Talmud;

* a herd of hairless hopping hippos in hoop-skirts hollering "Hari Krishna!";

* a mass of marching mammoth morons in mumus mouthing Mormanism or miming
Mohammedism;

* a colony of capering camel cretins in cowled capes carolling Christianity;

* a bunch of blatting behemoth Bhuddists in bolas battling birth-control.

Kent, the man from xanth.
<xant...@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xant...@well.sf.ca.us>
--
Or we could just yell "ideal experimental tissue source" and stampede them
all over a cliff.

Mr. Big Stuff

unread,
Mar 20, 1991, 5:23:26 PM3/20/91
to
xant...@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes:
>"Eniagon" -- the most obscure of the Platonic solids, the nine sided
>one; fron "eniad", a group of nine, and "newbie-be-gone", a term used
>for one who doesn't fit. The eniagon is like an octahedron, but with
>also a lot of resemblance to a litter of pigs; the one extra side is
>always mooching about, looking for a chance to shove its way in and
>displace one of the others, which then takes up the search in turn.


(brian whacks xanthian on head with prybar) Purple Duck!

0 new messages