Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Evolution of the Feather

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Budikka666

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 4:57:44 PM12/16/09
to
Ed Yong at www.scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience
http://tinyurl.com/ybdm3bl
blogs on feathers. Be sure to check out the links at the bottom of
the article.

Contrary to how LYING creationist scum would have it, the pathway to
how the feather evolved is really quite well understood.

Budikka

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 5:29:56 PM12/16/09
to
Ono Dec 16, 3:57 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> Ed Yong atwww.scienceblogs.com/notrocketsciencehttp://tinyurl.com/ybdm3bl

> blogs on feathers.  Be sure to check out the links at the bottom of
> the article.
>
> Contrary to how LYING creationist scum would have it, the pathway to
> how the feather evolved is really quite well understood.
>
> Budikka

Its evident by your willful hostile speech that impossible Pond Scum
to 206 bone Human Being MUST be a reality regardless of top world
reknown atheist Scientists saying otherwise.

haiku jones

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 5:34:40 PM12/16/09
to

So, tell us: if these "top world reknown atheist Scientists"
don't believe in evolution ... and yet they remain atheistic -- what
do they attribute the whole shooting match to?


-- Haiku Jones, (who still can't get an answer whether
Francis Crick has convinced "Illbebauck" that
space aliens started us off)

panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 6:09:57 PM12/16/09
to
On Dec 16, 5:29 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ono Dec 16, 3:57 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>
> > Ed Yong atwww.scienceblogs.com/notrocketsciencehttp://tinyurl.com/ybdm3bl
> > blogs on feathers.  Be sure to check out the links at the bottom of
> > the article.
>
> > Contrary to how LYING creationist scum would have it, the pathway to
> > how the feather evolved is really quite well understood.
>
> > Budikka
>
> Its evident by your willful hostile speech

And it's evident by *yours* that you're the most ignorant motherfucker
in the room right now.

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!

Tim Miller

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 7:57:03 PM12/16/09
to

And yet, you remain completely unable to support your assertions about
these "top world reknown atheist Scientists".

Go figure.

Ralph

unread,
Dec 16, 2009, 8:28:56 PM12/16/09
to


Careful there PF, this NG is full of candidates:-)).

Uncle Vic

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 12:54:57 AM12/17/09
to
One fine day in alt.atheism, "IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

It's not surprising you morons poo-poo evolution. It doesn't fit into
your Literal Bible timeline. Not much has happened, evolutionarily
speaking, in the last 6,000 years. But a LOT has happened in the last
three billion years - hell, even in the last 65 million, after the mass
extinction that took the dinosaurs with it, visible in the KT Boundary
sedimentary layer visible in rock formations all over the world.

Does it hurt to be so stupid?

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs.

Syd M.

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 1:32:39 AM12/17/09
to
On Dec 16, 5:29 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:

Liar.

PDW

Devils Advocaat

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 2:08:04 AM12/17/09
to

Oh really? What atheist scientists would they be?

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 3:59:05 AM12/17/09
to
It is an ancient "IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com>, and he
posteth:

> Ono Dec 16, 3:57�pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> Ed Yong atwww.scienceblogs.com/notrocketsciencehttp://tinyurl.com/ybdm3bl
>> blogs on feathers. �Be sure to check out the links at the bottom of
>> the article.
>>
>> Contrary to how LYING creationist scum would have it, the pathway to
>> how the feather evolved is really quite well understood.
>>
>> Budikka

> Laa laaa laaa...... I'm not listening!

IFYPFY.

--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
"Christian" (n). A person who views insulting non-Christians as a sacred
duity, and any response as persecution

Not authentic without this signature.

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 12:52:50 PM12/17/09
to
"Uncle Vic" <add...@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CE3DFFD...@216.196.97.131...

> One fine day in alt.atheism, "IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ono Dec 16, 3:57 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>> Ed Yong
>>> atwww.scienceblogs.com/notrocketsciencehttp://tinyurl.com/ybdm3bl
>>> blogs on feathers. Be sure to check out the links at the bottom of
>>> the article.
>>>
>>> Contrary to how LYING creationist scum would have it, the pathway to
>>> how the feather evolved is really quite well understood.
>>>
>>> Budikka
>>
>> Its evident by your willful hostile speech that impossible Pond Scum
>> to 206 bone Human Being MUST be a reality regardless of top world
>> reknown atheist Scientists saying otherwise.
>>
>
> It's not surprising you morons poo-poo evolution. It doesn't fit into
> your Literal Bible timeline. Not much has happened, evolutionarily
> speaking, in the last 6,000 years. But a LOT has happened in the last
> three billion years - hell, even in the last 65 million, after the mass
> extinction that took the dinosaurs with it, visible in the KT Boundary
> sedimentary layer visible in rock formations all over the world.
>
> Does it hurt to be so stupid?

Actually, evolution is just as active now, as then. Ferinst, there is a
Garter Snake in the US southwest, that has evolved a poisonous bite.


Ralph

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 3:39:57 PM12/17/09
to


We're here, aren't we?


Budikka666

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:16:43 PM12/17/09
to
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.

Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.

Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.

Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.

Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.

Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.

Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary

Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.

Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.

Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.

Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave

Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.

Case closed. End of story. End of You.

Budikka

Ken

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:21:07 PM12/17/09
to
On Dec 17, 12:39 pm, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> We're here, aren't we?

"Dave's not here"----Cheech n Chong
"Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?---------HAL from 2001

0 new messages