Re: Jan. 6 panel warned Bannon of possible charges, staffer testifies

1 view
Skip to first unread message

kron

unread,
Jul 20, 2022, 2:16:40 PMJul 20
to
On 20 Jul 2022, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com> posted some
news:FiXBK.493096$J0r9....@fx11.iad:

> On 7/20/2022 10:46 AM, >>> Jack-off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
> <d...@shit.invalid>, HIV+ cocksucker and convicted child molester,
> stupidly bawled and lied:
>
>> On 7/20/2022 9:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> Stephen K. Bannon’s contempt of Congress trial resumed Wednesday
>>> with testimony from a Jan. 6 committee staffer, who told jurors that
>>> the panel warned Bannon of possible criminal charges after his
>>> lawyer first indicated that he would not comply with a congressional
>>> subpoena.
>>>
>>> Testimony from committee general counsel Kristin Amerling continued
>>> on the first full day of testimony after a rocky start to the
>>> proceeding. Bannon’s lawyers had sought a delay over questions
>>> about what evidence was allowed, but U.S. District Judge Carl J.
>>> Nichols ordered that the trial proceed, and opening statements took
>>> place Tuesday.
>>>
>>> The judge warned defense lawyers Wednesday that he would intervene
>>> during the questioning of witnesses to keep them from turning the
>>> trial into a “political circus.”
>>>
>>> Federal prosecutors raised concerns that Bannon’s legal defense
>>> seems built around the claim that the subpoena issued by the House
>>> committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol
>>> attack was “illegitimate” because it was motivated by politics.
>>>
>>> Bannon, the former political strategist for Donald Trump, was
>>> indicted on two misdemeanor contempt charges and accused of refusing
>>> to comply with an order from the House select committee to turn over
>>> records and testify about his actions ahead of the attack.
>>>
>>> Bannon’s lawyers have argued that their client did not
>>> “ignore” the committee’s formal request but was in
>>> negotiations with the panel.
>>>
>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/20/steve-bannon-trial
>>> -live-updates/
>>>
>>> Bannon was not "negotiating" with the select committee. He simply
>>> and flatly refused to appear and to produce the documents.
>>>
>>> *LOCK HIM UP*
>>
>> No ome [sic] cares anymore Ruby.
>
> Bannon sure the fuck cares, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell, you
> stupid HIV+ lying fat fuck.

Still waiting for Hillary Clinton to be charged with destroying evidence,
slander, libel, general all-around perjury, and election fraud.

governo...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 20, 2022, 8:56:08 PMJul 20
to
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 18:16:39 -0000 (UTC), kron <kr...@239.10.18.46>
wrote:

>On 20 Jul 2022, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com> posted some
>news:FiXBK.493096$J0r9....@fx11.iad:
>
>> On 7/20/2022 10:46 AM, >>> Jack-off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell
>> <d...@shit.invalid>, HIV+ cocksucker and convicted child molester,
>> stupidly bawled and lied:
>>
>>> On 7/20/2022 9:29 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>> Stephen K. Bannon’s contempt of Congress trial resumed Wednesday
>>>> with testimony from a Jan. 6 committee staffer, who told jurors that
>>>> the panel warned Bannon of possible criminal charges after his
>>>> lawyer first indicated that he would not comply with a congressional
>>>> subpoena.
>>>>
>>>> Testimony from committee general counsel Kristin Amerling continued
>>>> on the first full day of testimony after a rocky start to the
>>>> proceeding. Bannon’s lawyers had sought a delay over questions
>>>> about what evidence was allowed, but U.S. District Judge Carl J.
>>>> Nichols ordered that the trial proceed, and opening statements took
>>>> place Tuesday.
>>>>
>>>> The judge warned defense lawyers Wednesday that he would intervene
>>>> during the questioning of witnesses to keep them from turning the
>>>> trial into a “political circus.�€?
>>>>
>>>> Federal prosecutors raised concerns that Bannon’s legal defense
>>>> seems built around the claim that the subpoena issued by the House
>>>> committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol
>>>> attack was “illegitimate�€? because it was motivated by politics.
>>>>
>>>> Bannon, the former political strategist for Donald Trump, was
>>>> indicted on two misdemeanor contempt charges and accused of refusing
>>>> to comply with an order from the House select committee to turn over
>>>> records and testify about his actions ahead of the attack.
>>>>
>>>> Bannon’s lawyers have argued that their client did not
>>>> “ignore�€? the committee’s formal request but was in
>>>> negotiations with the panel.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/07/20/steve-bannon-trial
>>>> -live-updates/
>>>>
>>>> Bannon was not "negotiating" with the select committee. He simply
>>>> and flatly refused to appear and to produce the documents.
>>>>
>>>> *LOCK HIM UP*
>>>
>>> No ome [sic] cares anymore Ruby.
>>
>> Bannon sure the fuck cares, Jack-Off Skeeter Shit-4-Braincell, you
>> stupid HIV+ lying fat fuck.
>
>Still waiting for Hillary Clinton to be charged with destroying evidence,
>slander, libel, general all-around perjury, and election fraud.

Hold your breath.

Swill
--
Pizzagate, Fostergate, CattleFuturesgate, Travelgate,
Filegate, Troopergate, Whitewater, Benghazi,
EmailGate, Uraniumgate - the list of GOP manufactured "scandals"
involving Hillary that have never amounted to
anything goes back for decades. The rightwing fear
of her just goes on and on............
- On "Hillarygate" from Usenet poster
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages