Chicken Andrew Rears His Dumb Ass Again
Budikka666
> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
pretend he can support.
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka
Christopher A. Lee
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>On Jan 2, 6:39�am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
>> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
>> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
>
>Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
>is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
>existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
>challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
>from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
>pretend he can support.
What have we done to deserve this lunatic?
Ken
> What have we done to deserve this lunatic?
Time to play Wack-a-Mole!
Andrew
> On Jan 2, 6:39�am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
>> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
>> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
>
> Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
> is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
> existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
> challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
> from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
> pretend he can support.
You appear to be talking to yourself again. You may want to seek
professional help for that.
>
> Unmet challenge #1
> The challenge I offered you in this thread:
> http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
> on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
>
> Unmet challenge #2
> Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
> quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
> Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
> Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
> even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Cosmic microwave background. Consistent red shift of distant galaxies.
>
> Unmet challenge #3
> Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
> this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
It doesn't. It seems like evidence of one to me.
>
> Unmet challenge #4
> Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
> than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
It's never been observed.
>
> Unmet challenge #5
> Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
> cannot be added to a genome.
Why should I? I'm not a creationist.
>
> Unmet challenge #6
> Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
> what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
> one species from evolving into another species over time.
As I entirely accept the theory of evolution that would be pointless
>
> Unmet Challenge #7
> Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
> unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
> your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
> when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
> to the contrary
Don't remember ever claiming that. As I teach chemistry - including a
substantial amnount of organic chemistry - I'm fully aware that we are
composed of organic chemicals. What is true is that life has never been
observed to arise from inert organic chemicals.
>
> Unmet Challenge #8
> Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
> Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
> LIARS and FRAUDS.
Sir, I am neither a creationist nor a fundamentalist
>
> Unmet Challenge #9
> Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
> what its purpose is.
>
> Unmet Challenge #10
> Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
> died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Written records. The Gospels and the letters of Paul. Did you miss
those? Or are you one of those people who operate the "provide
evidence, as long as it isn't something I've already chosen to
disregard"?
>
> Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
> HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
> Chicken Adman
> Chicken Andrew
> Chicken Brother Ted
> Chicken Codebreaker
> Chicken Curtjester1
> Chicken Duke
> Chicken Gabriel
> Chicken I'll Be Bauck
> Chicken Pastor Dave
It's probably just that you're not worth bothering with. I'll keep my
counsel on that
>
> Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
> find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
> has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
> pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
>
> Case closed. End of story. End of You.
>
> Budikka
Ah, Budikka.... at least the middle syllable is accurate.
AZ Nomad
>On 2010-01-02 16:03:04 +0000, Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> said:
>> On Jan 2, 6:39?am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
>>> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
>>> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
>>
>> Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
>> is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
>> existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
>> challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
>> from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
>> pretend he can support.
>You appear to be talking to yourself again. You may want to seek
>professional help for that.
You're incessant lies would be reason for you to seek profession help
were it were possible for you to be cured.
Christopher A. Lee
wrote:
>On 2010-01-02 16:03:04 +0000, Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> said:
>
>> On Jan 2, 6:39�am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
>>> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
>>> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
>>
>> Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
>> is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
>> existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
>> challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
>> from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
>> pretend he can support.
>
>You appear to be talking to yourself again. You may want to seek
>professional help for that.
Budikka isn't the narcissist living in a fantasy world. You're the
mentally ill one who needs help - she's part of the real world you
deny exists.
What is it that makes so many theists like you such stupid, nasty,
deluded narcissists?
Budikka666
> On 2010-01-02 16:03:04 +0000, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> said:
>
> > On Jan 2, 6:39 am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
> >> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
> >> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
What a great game you play. You appear to acknowledge encountering me
before, but you deny that you're the creationist whose dumb ass I've
kicked repeatedly.
Fine if you're not Chicken Andrew then I withdraw the questions.
OTOH this could be yet another dishonest ploy of yours, but since I'm
in no mood to play games, I'll let you go.
[rest snipped]
Budikka
Budikka666
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:45:38 +0000, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
> >On 2010-01-02 16:03:04 +0000, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> said:
> >> On Jan 2, 6:39?am, Andrew <thecr...@macunlimited.net> wrote:
> >>> Ahh... the atheist appeal to reason. How transcendently rational. I've
> >>> so missed the cut and thrust of your rapier-like wit.
>
> >> Chicken Andrew will thrice deny his god. He will deny that there even
> >> is a god, he will deny that there is a creation, and he will deny the
> >> existence of the soul as he RUNS AWAY from addressing these nine
> >> challenges, *all* of which arise *directly*
> >> from things *he* stated but now is too much of a coward to even
> >> pretend he can support.
> >You appear to be talking to yourself again. You may want to seek
> >professional help for that.
>
> You're incessant lies would be reason for you to seek profession help
> were it were possible for you to be cured.
This one appears to be a different godbot from the one who appears to
have fled Usenet after having his dumb ass kicked royally. I guess
the other one is actually smarter than we'd hitherto assumed given
that he's chosen not to expose his butt to our feet any more!
Although this one isn't that much better given that he thinks the CMB
constitutes positive scientific evidence for a divine creation! LoL!
Budikka