Mike Rogers: LIAR, Coward, Creationist SCUM

[Budikka]

On Nov 14, 2:50 pm, Mike Rogers <tocri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 4, 11:01 am, Just James <post_mas...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In a couple of conversations I had, theevolutiondenier often says some
> > thing along the lines that they do not believe inevolutionsince it
> > cannot be tested.  These same people accept micro-evolution, but deny
> > macroevolution.
>
> > I point out that we have lots of ways of testing micro-evolutionand
> > that macro is just those same changes spread over billions of years.
> > Further, we have other sources like geology, astrophysics and
> > anthropology, that help us understand we are on the right track and that
> > there is not shred of evidence that the earth is biblically young.
>
> > One counter argument that has come up is those rare creatures that just
> > don;t change very much over time like trilobites or cockroaches.  The
> > question is raised why they don't change over long periods of time.
> > While I think they do, perhaps they simply do not need to.
>
> > I recently got two books that I am excited to get into,Evolution: What
> > the Fossils Say and Why It Matters by Donald Prothero and The Greatest
> > Show on Earth: The Evidence forEvolutionby Richard Dawkins.  I'd just
> > like better answers to stupid questions.
>
> > --
> > Just James
>
> > "Not everyone requires a rational explanation before they can believe
> > something. It's called faith." ~ Zootal (ARM 10/20/2009)
>
> > Priceless
>
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> living beings regardless that modern man is  supposedly a result of
> those changes in the first place. Only an uninformed fanatic says that
> evolution  can be proved scientifically. Christians believe in
> creationism because we believe in the veracity of the Bible but we
> also have scientific evidence to support our position. Evolutionists
> don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess, suppose, etc.
> but they don't "know." Honest scientists have become weary and
> embarrassed at the confusing, convoluted and contradictory claptrap
> that often passes as science .Need I remind our readers of the many
> incredible mistakes made by evolutionists because of their faith:
> Haeckel's recapitulation theory that only third-rate scientists
> believe; also the vestigial organ error; the failure of the fossil
> record (that no informed evolutionist uses to prove his position), etc.

Bring your scientific/objective evidence for your creation or your
creator right here and let's see it. Evolutionists of all faiths
(including yours) have been publishing scientific evidence for
evolution for 150 years.

Now it's your turn. Or you can continue LYING and RUNNING. Your
choice.

Budikka