Gladwell uses several examples in Outliers when introducing this rule: one is the research done by Ericsson that focused on violin students at a music academy in Berlin. The study found that the most accomplished of the students had put in 10,000 hours by the time they turned 20. Gladwell also estimates that the Beatles put in 10,000 hours of practice playing in Hamburg in the early 1960s, and that Bill Gates put in 10,000 hours of programming work before founding Microsoft. Hence the 10,000 hour rule was born: put in your 10,000 hours of practice, and become an expert in a given field. Pretty easy, right?
The age at which someone gets involved in an activity seems to play a role in their ability to achieve mastery. As with language learning, there may be a window during childhood when specific, complex skills are most easily acquired. Cognitive psychologists Fernand Gobet and Guillermo Campitelli found that chess players who started early reached higher skills levels as adults than those who started later, even after taking into account differences in deliberate practice hours.
This is probably just the article some people were looking for to not develop a training, or study routine. The fact is if you engage in anything consistently with focused study, you will master quite a few skills in way under 10,000 hours, some may take more, but the simple act of tracking your progress and maintaining consistency has likely lead a lot of people attaining some degree of proficiency that they otherwise would not have achieved.
From a neurological perspective, there appears to be no coincidence between what the 10,000 hour rule expresses and the fact that the fine motor skills needed to achieve a level of mastery (at least in music) are gained only after many, many hours of persistent, constant practicing.
While reading the article and formulating an opinion of partial agreeance, we do need to consider some of the conclusions are not equal. In life our individualism is a key to the ability of mastering any set task. There are natural abilities and trained abilities. I believe that someone that has a natural ability to complete tasks that involve motor skills have a far greater chance to master tasks that involve physical activities, assembly, and controlled dis-assembly tasks. That same skill set my not be as adapt to complete intellectual or formulated tasks. On the flip side someone that has the natural ability to perform intellectual and/or formulated tasks may not be as adaptive to manual tasks. In either case training is a key propulsion factor that needs to be entered into the equation. As a individual learns based on the experience of another the time that the trainer has established to master any given task must be added to the overall time that it takes the training individual to absorb those skill sets. If we look at natural skill sets, time with a master of that skill set to train, and the skill set in practice, I believe the number of hours will be much more true and closer to the 10,000 hours of the rule. Or maybe the 10,000 hour rule needs to be changed to the 10,000 hour average. 10,000 experiments will lend itself to inconclusive hard results but establish itself to the law of averages. In individualism, passion, training, self-motivation and drive, or the lack there/of must be taken into consideration and be clocked. An individual that is passionate about something will not resist learning the skill to mastery but embrace it, on the other hand an individual that is not as passionate about something and resists the work that it takes to master a skill will under most circumstances take longer to acquire the desired end result. In this case as well as any other case where a RULE is established there will always be individuals that thrive on the challenge to prove the RULE wrong, inconclusive, or remove merit from the rule.
With this new name and definition it clarifies that it is 10,000 hours of deliberate practice, just a rough estimate to use as a guideline, and it could take you more or less time to sufficiently master a skill.
10,000 hours of deliberate practice. Jay Sea: You said it all. Deliberate practice involves being smart about it; learning from mentors and coaches. This makes each hour a huge difference from someone waisting the hours doing what he can be taught in minutes.
Adrian Smith took up the guitar at 15 in 1972. He joined Iron Maiden in 1980. You also have no idea how many hours any professional has played. Almost none kept a log of actual hours played. Sorry. No facts and wrong facts.
Malcolm wrote a piece of literature to inspire people. Who cares if 10,000 is correct or not? The point is, we need to start somewhere, grow, challenge ourselves, and just to learn something new. I believe in learning to work towards something of interest or something that comes naturally first, and then spend your life doing it. When you get older help children advance and be better than you. That is evolution.
Yes, there is more involved in becoming a master than just the hours spent. Time is not the only element, but time is a concept idea most can grasp. Life is not information life is turning human capability into ability, and to do that, it requires practice and then commits to doing ongoing work to achieve success. My question is_, Why not spend 10,000 hours? If you spend 2 hours a day practicing, something, and progress each year, you will gain close to fourteen years of experience. The rewards will be great whether or not to achieve mastery. One thing I would guarantee, is anyway who applies themselves to 10,000 hours of progressive practice will become GOOD at whatever they choose to do. Work to produce results. If you have an interest, pursue it. You may not reach your goal, but you will gain the experience attaining results that will demonstrate something more than where you will end up if you do nothing.
I found the 10,000 hour rule to be very motivating to practice guitar.
After doing the math, I started to practice 8 to 12 hours a day for a couple years straight. The improvement was steady.
When I ran out of ways to improve on something, I would naturally find something else to work on. After I hit a total of 10,000 hours, I reduced my practice to an hour or two a day, and I have continued to improve.
I believe that everyone progresses at their own rate, just like the original violin study showed with the total hours being an average. However, if the 10,000 hour meme motivates some people to practice, then why not continue to spread the idea?
This article is bogus. The actual paper never stated that 10K hours can make you an expert. It states that SOME people whom have mastered their craft did so with an estimate Xhrs per day x Xdays per week x Xweeks per yr x Xyears ALONG WITH CONSTANT FEEDBACK, ADJUSTMENT, and deliberate practice.
Do you ever wonder why some people seem to be more successful than others? It could be because they understand the power of hard work and dedication. This concept is famously known as the 10000 Hour Rule, which states that it takes roughly 10,000 hours of practice for a person to become an expert in something.
The 10000 Hour Rule says that if you practice something for 10,000 hours, you can become a master of it. Hard work is very important because it helps you to get better and better at things. With enough hard work and dedication, anyone can become an expert in something they are passionate about.
On a more personal level, people can use the 10000 Hour Rule to achieve success in areas such as health, fitness, and self-development. For instance, someone who wants to get fit could set a goal of exercising for 10,000 hours over several years so that they reach their desired level of fitness. Similarly, if someone is striving for self-improvement or personal growth then they should use this rule as motivation to put in the hard work necessary for achieving their goals.
This rule is not just about the number of hours invested but more importantly, about the quality of those hours. Deliberate, focused practice is at the heart of this principle. Remember, progress may be slow, and the journey may be challenging, but with consistency and determination, the mastery you seek is within your grasp.
Malcolm Gladwell published his blockbuster book, Outliers, in 2008 and the most talked-about idea from the text was the 10,000 Hour Rule. Gladwell, citing research by K. Anders Ericsson, explained that the key to becoming world-class in any field was to practice a specific task for at least 10,000 hours.
These reflections are just about deliberately writing code for 10,000 hours. Most don't apply to beginners. These reflections are not career advice. Think of them as lessons on being a technical guitarist, not about being a good band member. They are about becoming a better programmer for yourself.
What did I do for the 10,000 hours? My most recent work was in distributed systems, but I've written code across the stack. Languages like PHP, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, Python, C#, Java, Swift. Frontend, backend, mobile, kernel, cloud, ops, and even some IT. I've worked on large-scale open-source projects like Kubernetes and maintained subprojects, which allowed me to have my code peer-reviewed by some of the best engineers.
The 10,000 hours from the book are to master a skill. 10,000 hours will make you Buddy Rich good (well, maybe not quite :)). You goal specifically states you do not require mastery, so you will not need 10,000 hours. Here is a TED talk that says 20 hours of intensive training is enough to get basic proficiency with anything. There is also a video of Tim Ferris learning the drums in a similar amount of time. .
While you can argue whether 20 is enough, the basic idea is valid. With focused training, you do not need an excessive number of hours to gain proficiency. Your schedule of about 15 hours per week will serve as a very good basis for becoming good within a reasonable time frame. I suggest looking for a good book, which will explain the basics and provide plenty of exercises. Maybe try to find a teacher in your area. At least a few lessons to get you on the right track.
31c5a71286