We hear reports that an increasing number of hyperlocal sites are
monitored by big media. Mike and Tony's marvellous pitsnpots in
Stoke-on-Trent is constantly watched by the news organisations. Simon
and Sally's Ventnorblog was at the heart of reporting the Vesta wind
turbine factory occupation. Bournville village had the best coverage
of the cadbury takeover. I was on the panel selecting new ITV
regional news providers to make sure that the winners understood (or
were prepared to learn) the role of the hyperlocal web in a regional
'news ecology'. Alan Rusbridger set hyperlocal sites as one bookend
in the future of news (Murdoch being the other..)
Overall, this is a hard-won evolution from simple patronisation and
condecension, though there is still some of that about.
Would it be worth having a discussion about what the 'terms of trade'
might to be between hyperlocal sites and trad media organisations?
what would each get from the other in a mutual relationship? does it
involve payment (and all the baggage that goes with that) or is a slap
up lunch every now and then the right relationship? what if a TV news
company made a regular donation to a local civic or children's charity
say? What should a TV company expect from a hyperlocal site. And
vice versa.
We have one or two folk coming along who do work for news gatherers
but also get the local web and don't talk strategy bollox. Worth a
session.
--
To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
It will be difficult to nurture a relationship between the Mail and
hyperlocals in the Hull area because of the bitter-aftertaste of this
particular episode. However, we have to try. I hope that this session
will help and advise hyperlocals on making themselves indispensible in
their local areas - not only to their local communities, but also to
other media organisations.
Much better to co-operate and collaborate than compete?
Rgds
Ray
Hedon Blog
For traditional media, many hyperlocals will be covering such a small
area that trying to work with them could involve a fair bit of
overhead (this is my assumption, the reality may be different). As an
example, the Birmingham Mail serves quite a large area, including
where I live in Lichfield. This area contains (or potentially
contains) something stupid like 100 hyperlocal sites. So it may be
better if hyperlocals could collaborate with newspapers and the like
as a group, talking through how we can work together that we can all
agree on and work to.
So part of the discussion, I think, is how we can create that network
where we decide, as a group, what we can offer local media and present
a more co-ordinated and coherent voice to present to traditional
media.
Looking forward to talking through this.
On Apr 8, 4:29 pm, william perrin <williamjper...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
I'd like to run the session along with a very pleasant guy I know who
works for that big commercial regional media company, Trinity Mirror.
We'll stand up and talk to each other (hyperlocal to local media co.)
about what we think we can offer each other. Then we'll put it to the
floor to suggest other ideas and ask questions.
Hopefully we can get hold of some flip chart things or just some big
pieces of paper and marker pens we'll write all the suggestions we
have down so that we have a nice record that we can all think and blog
about.
Sound good?
Who is that?
David and I worked together on the North East IFNC bid, and he is
indeed a very pleasant guy.
Dead smart one too. AND he's giving me a lift on Saturday morning.
Session sounds good. From an IFNC perspective, I'm interested in a
couple of ideas already raised here:
- Working on the assumption that 'big media' and hyperlocal should
work together, how best to set (and review) those terms of engagement?
In a large area (say 'the North East') would it work better for
hyperlocals to work together to form a coherent view of these terms,
or would they prefer to be dealt with individually? Pros and cons
either way, obv...
- What role can big media play to make these relationships work best?
eg venues for meet-ups and unconferences?
- How can the two groups better understand each other's motivations,
and limitations?
- What are the areas for possible collaboration?
Really keen to be part of this session. There's a chap called Nico
coming along too who was part of the UTV bid that one the Wales IFNC.
Am sure he will be active participant.
Massive fan of flipcharts ;-)
Chris
> > > > session.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Like most people visiting this Google Group I think that there's so
much to discuss and so little time and far too few sessions to discuss
and action-plan!
Hmm perhaps #TAL11 should be a weekend if we can generate enough
funding for us poor people too attend a full w/e! lol
This sounds like a really interesting discussion and I'd be interested
to take part. I was involved in the Tinopolis IFNC bid in Wales and
I'm now looking to set up some new projects off the back of that...but
the relationship between 'traditional' media and new hyperlocal sites
is something that's been at the forefront of my mind for the past few
months!
Would be good to sit down, meet and chat with you guys.
Look forward to it!
Glyn
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Jason - jason@oxburymedia , www.oxburymedia.co.uk
Look forward to hearing everyones input. See you then.
On Apr 14, 10:40 am, Chris Condron <chriscond...@gmail.com> wrote: