Fifa 19 Icons Squad File

[Mike Fowler]

Aftercompleting the Mbappe SBC, I tried to add him to my team. My icons are now not giving chemistry to any league??? It has reverted to fifa 23 chem style, just adding points to their nation. I had a quick look at patch notes etc and community pages, I seem to be the only one having this problem. Anyone else?

So I played yesterday all fine no issues with the game then today when I logged in my companion app to put players on sale that I got from squad battles on sale I noticed my chemistry wasn't full and when I check 2 players from my team are gone 2 players that costed over 400k to buy not only that I can't access the transfer market and while they tell me to check my email to see the email they sent I keep checking but nothing from them pops up besides the EA access that I was doing to connect to Amazon prime.

I have got 5 icons in my team, Blanc, Dalgleish, Rooney and Ballack but some players like Salah then appear to only have 1 chemistry point while others like Llorente and Cancelo have 2. I thought each icon gives 1 chem point to each league in FC 24?

According to Goal, players can use either their own or their partner's squad, and the mode will have its own objectives and scoring system that means progress in single player mode will not be impacted.

Making an appearance for the first time as Ultimate Team icons are: FC Barcelona legends Samuel Eto'o and Xaxi; former Chelsea FC trio Petr Cech, Ashley Cole, and Fernando Torres; as well as Eric Cantona, Ferenc Puskas, Nemanja Vidic, Bastian Schweinsteiger, Philipp Lahm, and Davor Suker.

Players will be able to change their team's walk on music and add pyrotechnics to goal celebrations, while it also appears players can edit the stadium's color and add a "pitch trophy" such as a giant birthday cake, a treasure chest, or a GOAT statue.

Here is what the dream of every hardcore football fan. Good old times' classics footballers play together as teams in FIFA 19

Now you can play as icons in offline mode. It also includes World XI and 4 classic national teams

Information about the Mod :

With a squad file that unlocks icons for offline mode, I transferred icons from Free Agents to Generic Teams

Since icon team doesnt exist in FIFA 19, i needed to use generic unlicensed teams, remove their original players and replace them with icons players

so that i could make icons players into full teams

Because the number of icons exceeds the number of players that a team could have at total, I divided icons into different teams depending on their eras

I also created classic national teams with icons as well as World XI made up of best players of today

Icon teams and World XI could be found in Italian Serie B. Classic national teams could be found normally in International teams, replacing the originals

Salerno team is used for Icons who played in 1970s and 1980s

Livorno team is used for Icons who played in 1990s

Venezia team is used for Icons who played in early 2000s

La Spezia Team is used for Worlds players, the team is made according to FIFPRO World XI's official eleven 2018

Carpi team is used for Icons players who has young and prime versions, collecting their other forms

National squads of England, France, Italy and Netherlands replaced by Icons to create Classic National teams

Installation :

Simply unrar and put the squad file into Documents / FIFA 19 / Settings

Open the game and choose this new icon squad file from Load Squads

and you are ready to play with icons

You dont need to remove your existing squad file to play with this mod as you can use more than one squad file

This means you can still use your updated actual squad file, as well as icons squad file

Notes :

- IMPORTANT !! This squad file is only for Icon / Classic teams. All other normal teams has outdated / incorrect squads. So, only use Icon / Classic teams to play

- Most players has correct numbers. However, due to some conflicts, (more than one Number 10 player in same team), some players has different numbers

but still related to their original number. (88 instead of 8 for example). All players are numbered manually, no random irrelevant number

- Due to an unknown problem, icon teams formations cannot be set from presets, but could still be changed manually

- Due to limited number of icons, Classic National Teams have few icon players, hardly could be formed as eleven.

There are no icons in the bench, but the teams are still enough to be a Classic Team as they have fully starting elevens made of icons

- Base of the squad file used for modification was taken from IMStudiomods. Credits go to them

Thank you

I would love to do that, and even I planned to do. but unfortunately there arent enough icons to create classic teams Brazil, Argentina, Germany and Spain. you cant even make an eleven to play. England, Italy, France and Netherlands are the only ones you can create an eleven to play. This is why I had to cut others

Your comment action was successful. When a comment is deleted all replies to the comment will be removed as well. Because you are an admin, you can click the \"view deleted\" link above to view deleted comments in-case you wish to undelete them in the future. If this was a mistake, click the link again to reverse the change.

I know in international sports articles, it's customary to use flags (which I agree with); however, what is the usefulness of flags in articles like Dallas Mavericks all-time roster? The Mavericks are an NBA team, there's no international competition; all they do is place an unnecessary emphasis on the players' nationalities, which are totally meaningless because they're playing in an American league. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

The removal and restoration of two paragraphs of the guideline should be discussed. Primarily, there has been a claim that these two paragraphs were not initially discussed before their addition. If this is incorrect and their addition was discussed and agreed upon, can someone provide a link to that discussion please? Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

First off it was added without discussion and was removed. At that point it should not have been readded without talking...period. It was readded without talk and I finally caught it and corrected it but you seem not to like that. Many around here would have problems with all of the added wording and we have to assume that 99.99% of editors don't watch this page regularly. Of highest bias are the terms "unnecessarily distracting" "undue prominence to one field" and "should only be inserted in infoboxes in those cases where they convey information in addition to the text." I left in the "undue prominence" part as a compromise (though it was still never talked about) and then I see someone else smoothed over the writing to polish it. It's much better now...to the point that while I'm not exuberant it's there at all without discussion, I wouldn't bring it up again. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

The semi-perennial topic of the abuse of Template:Cquote to "prettify" block quotations, against MOS:QUOTE, MOS:ICONS and the template's own documentation (since weakened by fans of decoration), has popped up again at Template talk:Cquote (and, in a specific case, at Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution#Should the Second Amendment main text use Cquote?). NB: I make no pretense that this is a neutral notice/pointer; the practice blatantly violates the guidelines and at least two policies, and that should be made clear.

Simple question: is it ever appropriate to use flagicons in lists? I present to you December 2011 Nigeria bombings, featuring, among other monstrosities, the papal emblem of Pope Benedict XVI, a flag for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community of Malta, another for the Muslim Council of Britain and the emblem of USCIRF (who? what?). Jpatokal (talk) 04:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

So, what I'm proposing is that we amend the MOS to state that flags should not be used in lists. Are there any cases where flags in lists make sense? (Most of the MOS seems devoted to tables and infoboxes.) Jpatokal (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not proposing a blanket removal from all lists, I suggest we amend the MOS to state that flags in lists are discouraged, with local exceptions allowed if they have good enough reasons. We can use precisely the same wording as we do for infoboxes: Generally, flag icons should not be used in lists: they are unnecessarily distracting. That said, I'm still waiting for any examples of a good use of flags in lists...? Jpatokal (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Per the discussion and consensus at WP:GEOGRAPHY, I have included geographic to the exclusions to MOSFLAG. This conforms to the majority usage and the consensus developed at the project. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The flags are meant to represent countries of ancestral origin, not of current nationlity, and the information is based on community surveys and census data. Primarily, but not exclusively that found in Census 2000.Thesouthernhistorian45 (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

All of the Academy Award nominees in this list have their countries identified by their respective flags. While I don't dispute the respective country identifications (i.e. as far as I know the people with the Swedish flag really are Swedish, the people with the Norwegian flag really are Norwegian, etc.), I don't believe this is particularly useful. There are five countries involved, and all five of them use a Nordic Cross flag design. It's not like trying to distinguish among five very different flags such as, say, . It's exactly like trying to distinguish among . --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

On Ontario Highway 401, an article at WP:FAC, an editor added coordinates to the article. They were removed in the next edit with an edit description of "unnecessary detail and icons interrupting text. Coords are already in the linked article." I don't wish to get into them being about unnecessary details, only that the icons interrupt text.

3a8082e126