I hope we can borrow some ideas from a similar new software called BitMessage

[Max贝立.NoGFW审查]

https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Main_Page

--
Max贝立

请帮助Re推下面的微博短文，谢谢
#nogfw 我相信能网聚百万人反GFW审查：请电邮nogfw+s...@googlegroups.com响应，汇集百万呼吁，groups.google.com/group/nogfw 将自动统计人数。 #GFW，我们不高兴！请RT，成功就在指尖

[Michael Grube]

It might make some sense sense to do proof of work on top of Tahrir, but really I don't see it being ideal for people who are working with outdated or restricted technology. With Tahrir being a Twitter clone, it seems like making speech expensive on a proof of work system could be relatively easy. The whitepaper says that the solution to spam on this type of network is to increase the difficulty. What is the distinction between a well run spam campaign and DoS attack? The people with the fastest computing resources win out. If revolutionaries are Tahrir's ideal users, I think making proof of work mandatory could be a mistake.

2013/5/15 Max贝立.NoGFW审查 <nogf...@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tahrir Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tahrir-developm...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.