I have the alpha2 tag ready to push, the tarball ready to upload, and
polishing official Debian package before upload to "experimental".
The only missing piece in the puzzle is uploading the tarball to
http://tarballs.tagua-project.org/releases/ - Paolo, how do we proceed ?
All of you are of course welcome to drop on irc://freenode.net/#git to
have a virtual bear for this long-awaited event :)
Post release plans:
I have already merged alpha2 into component-api, and readied the set
of my patches which are ready for publication. Once the release has
settled, I suppose the logical course of actions would be to rename
"master" to "stable" and "component-api" to "master". Is that OK for
you ?
Then I'll go back to polishing *Behaviour to be able to finish *Shogi.
First I intend to revert my change to have Board::get() and others to
handle a pointer to Piece. But to keep Piece and other small classes
(eg. Component) lightweight, I'm tempted to inline their methods and
get rid of heir .cpp files. Do you have any objections on this ?
Best regards,
--
Yann
Although Paolo should probably have a say on this, more than me, I think it's
a good plan.
By the way, I have almost ready the site, had the inspiration a couple of days
ago, now it's just some inkscape tricks to be made. =)
Bye
-Riccardo
--
GPG key:
3D0F6376
When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey:
9EBD7FE1
-----
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch
Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Mir Py'guapy 평화
\o/
> The only missing piece in the puzzle is uploading the tarball to
> http://tarballs.tagua-project.org/releases/ - Paolo, how do we proceed ?
You can do that. Just ssh into tagua-project.org:1082 using the ssh key
you gave me.
> I have already merged alpha2 into component-api, and readied the set
> of my patches which are ready for publication. Once the release has
> settled, I suppose the logical course of actions would be to rename
> "master" to "stable" and "component-api" to "master". Is that OK for
> you ?
>
> Then I'll go back to polishing *Behaviour to be able to finish *Shogi.
> First I intend to revert my change to have Board::get() and others to
> handle a pointer to Piece. But to keep Piece and other small classes
> (eg. Component) lightweight, I'm tempted to inline their methods and
> get rid of heir .cpp files. Do you have any objections on this ?
Sounds ok.
Paolo
\o/
> The only missing piece in the puzzle is uploading the tarball to
> http://tarballs.tagua-project.org/releases/ - Paolo, how do we proceed ?
You can do that. Just ssh into tagua-project.org:1082 using the ssh key
you gave me.
> I have already merged alpha2 into component-api, and readied the set
> of my patches which are ready for publication. Once the release has
> settled, I suppose the logical course of actions would be to rename
> "master" to "stable" and "component-api" to "master". Is that OK for
> you ?
>
> Then I'll go back to polishing *Behaviour to be able to finish *Shogi.
> First I intend to revert my change to have Board::get() and others to
> handle a pointer to Piece. But to keep Piece and other small classes
> (eg. Component) lightweight, I'm tempted to inline their methods and
> get rid of heir .cpp files. Do you have any objections on this ?
Sounds ok.
Paolo
I don't have the permissions for /home/paolo/tagua/tarballs/releases/.
Maybe you should also move this directory to a more tagua-centric
location ?
In the meantime I have uploaded it to ~yann/.
> > I have already merged alpha2 into component-api, and readied the set
> > of my patches which are ready for publication. Once the release has
> > settled, I suppose the logical course of actions would be to rename
> > "master" to "stable" and "component-api" to "master". Is that OK for
> > you ?
> >
> > Then I'll go back to polishing *Behaviour to be able to finish *Shogi.
> > First I intend to revert my change to have Board::get() and others to
> > handle a pointer to Piece. But to keep Piece and other small classes
> > (eg. Component) lightweight, I'm tempted to inline their methods and
> > get rid of heir .cpp files. Do you have any objections on this ?
>
> Sounds ok.
Cool. Board::get() is back on its feet in my tree, and component-api
is slightly better now. I have started to play with valgrind, which
uncovered a couple of minor bugs - hopefully it will help us to locate
the more serious ones as well :)
Best regards,
--
Yann.
You are in the sudoers!
Btw, I've copied the tarball.
Paolo