[moderation/CI] Re: net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot ci

unread,
Aug 11, 2025, 5:20:26 PM8/11/25
to syzkaller-upst...@googlegroups.com, syz...@lists.linux.dev
syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v2] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811173116....@google.com
* [PATCH v2 net-next 01/12] mptcp: Fix up subflow's memcg when CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA=n.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 02/12] mptcp: Use tcp_under_memory_pressure() in mptcp_epollin_ready().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 03/12] tcp: Simplify error path in inet_csk_accept().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 04/12] net: Call trace_sock_exceed_buf_limit() for memcg failure with SK_MEM_RECV.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 05/12] net: Clean up __sk_mem_raise_allocated().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 06/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_from_sk().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 07/12] net-memcg: Introduce mem_cgroup_sk_enabled().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_(un)?charge().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 09/12] net-memcg: Pass struct sock to mem_cgroup_sk_under_memory_pressure().
* [PATCH v2 net-next 10/12] net: Define sk_memcg under CONFIG_MEMCG.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 11/12] net-memcg: Store MEMCG_SOCK_ISOLATED in sk->sk_memcg.
* [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] net-memcg: Decouple controlled memcg from global protocol memory accounting.

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/6fc666d9-cfec-413c-a98c-75c91ad6c07d

***

kernel build error

tree: net-next
URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
base: 37816488247ddddbc3de113c78c83572274b1e2e
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.7 (++20250616065708+6146a88f6049-1~exp1~20250616065826.132), Debian LLD 20.1.7
config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/a5d5d856-2809-4eee-87ca-2cd1630214ae/config

net/tls/tls_device.c:374:8: error: call to undeclared function 'sk_should_enter_memory_pressure'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syz...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[ak...@linux-foundation.org almas...@google.com cgr...@vger.kernel.org da...@davemloft.net edum...@google.com gel...@kernel.org han...@cmpxchg.org ho...@kernel.org ku...@kernel.org kuni...@gmail.com kun...@google.com linu...@kvack.org mart...@kernel.org mat...@kernel.org mho...@kernel.org mko...@suse.com mp...@lists.linux.dev muchu...@linux.dev ncar...@google.com net...@vger.kernel.org pab...@redhat.com roman.g...@linux.dev shakee...@linux.dev t...@kernel.org wil...@google.com]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

Aleksandr Nogikh

unread,
Aug 12, 2025, 3:44:20 AM8/12/25
to syzbot ci, syzkaller-upst...@googlegroups.com, syz...@lists.linux.dev
#syz upstream
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-upstream-m...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/689a5e98.050a0220.7f033.0102.GAE%40google.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages