syzbot ci has tested the following series
[v20] vfio/pci: Add PCIe TPH support
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260714104325.54...@huawei.com
* [PATCH v20 01/16] PCI/TPH: Add requester/completer type helpers
* [PATCH v20 02/16] dma-buf: add optional get_pci_tph() callback
* [PATCH v20 03/16] vfio/pci: implement get_pci_tph and DMA_BUF_TPH feature
* [PATCH v20 04/16] PCI/TPH: Fix pcie_tph_get_st_table_loc() field extraction
* [PATCH v20 05/16] PCI/TPH: Fix tph_enabled concurrent update race by bitfield packing
* [PATCH v20 06/16] PCI/TPH: Cache negotiated max requester type at probe time
* [PATCH v20 07/16] PCI/TPH: Refactor pcie_enable_tph and add requester variant
* [PATCH v20 08/16] PCI/TPH: Refactor pcie_tph_get_cpu_st & add requester variant
* [PATCH v20 09/16] PCI/TPH: Add macros to check standard and extended TPH support
* [PATCH v20 10/16] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_set_st_entries() batch ST entry programming helper
* [PATCH v20 11/16] PCI/TPH: Add pci_tph_dsm_supported() helper to detect device TPH ST _DSM
* [PATCH v20 12/16] vfio/pci: Add basic NO-ST TPH VFIO device feature support
* [PATCH v20 13/16] vfio/pci: Add IV-ST TPH policy and VFIO TPH_ST batch programming support
* [PATCH v20 14/16] vfio/pci: Add DS-ST TPH policy and extend TPH_RESOLVE capabilities
* [PATCH v20 15/16] vfio/pci: Sync core PCI TPH software state across device lifecycle and resets
* [PATCH v20 16/16] vfio/pci: Expose per-device TPH state via debugfs
and found the following issue:
kernel build error
Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/111f70c0-3cc4-4dd6-8e1e-4e1bd05c02f5
***
kernel build error
tree: torvalds
URL:
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
base: 3b029c035b34bbc693405ddf759f0e9b920c27f1
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 22.1.6 (++20260514074242+fc4aad7b5db3-1~exp1~20260514074407.73), Debian LLD 22.1.6
config:
https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/528f90fe-1e76-4f13-85af-dd4514b529b0/config
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1202:9: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
***
If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by:
syz...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at
syzk...@googlegroups.com.
To test a patch for this bug, please reply with `#syz test`
(should be on a separate line).
The patch should be attached to the email.
Note: arguments like custom git repos and branches are not supported.
The email will later be sent to:
[
al...@shazbot.org fengch...@huawei.com hel...@kernel.org j...@ziepe.ca k...@vger.kernel.org linu...@vger.kernel.org liuyo...@huawei.com wangyu...@huawei.com wang...@hisilicon.com wathsala....@arm.com wei.h...@amd.com zhip...@meta.com]
If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream
If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid