[moderation/CI] Re: bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h

0 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot ci

unread,
Mar 14, 2026, 8:10:21 PM (13 hours ago) Mar 14
to syzkaller-upst...@googlegroups.com, syz...@lists.linux.dev
syzbot ci has tested the following series

[v2] bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260314210810....@kernel.org
* [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Remove inclusions of crypto/sha1.h

and found the following issue:
kernel build error

Full report is available here:
https://ci.syzbot.org/series/38f41420-5e88-492b-9239-7c260178aa25

***

kernel build error

tree: torvalds
URL: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
base: 1c9982b4961334c1edb0745a04cabd34bc2de675
arch: amd64
compiler: Debian clang version 21.1.8 (++20251221033036+2078da43e25a-1~exp1~20251221153213.50), Debian LLD 21.1.8
config: https://ci.syzbot.org/builds/b5327796-0a46-46fc-a192-f0dbd20d9047/config

net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3341:25: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct sha1_ctx'
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3344:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SHA1_BLOCK_SIZE'
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3369:2: error: call to undeclared function 'sha1_init'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
net/ipv6/addrconf.c:3378:2: error: call to undeclared function 'sha1_update'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

***

If these findings have caused you to resend the series or submit a
separate fix, please add the following tag to your commit message:
Tested-by: syz...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
syzbot ci engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

The email will later be sent to:
[and...@kernel.org a...@kernel.org b...@vger.kernel.org dan...@iogearbox.net ebig...@kernel.org edd...@gmail.com hao...@google.com john.fa...@gmail.com jo...@kernel.org kps...@kernel.org linux-...@vger.kernel.org marti...@linux.dev s...@fomichev.me so...@kernel.org yongho...@linux.dev]

If the report looks fine to you, reply with:
#syz upstream

If the report is a false positive, reply with
#syz invalid

Aleksandr Nogikh

unread,
7:53 AM (1 hour ago) 7:53 AM
to syzbot ci, syzkaller-upst...@googlegroups.com, syz...@lists.linux.dev, Eric Biggers
Happened when the system applied the patch on the given base commit,
so it looks legit. Upstreaming.

#syz upstream
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-upstream-moderation" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-upstream-m...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-upstream-moderation/69b5f8eb.050a0220.12d28.014c.GAE%40google.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages