[syzbot] WARNING: Nested lock was not taken

4 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Sep 25, 2022, 9:40:38 PMSep 25
to linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, vi...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: c194837ebb57 Merge branch 'for-next/core', remote-tracking..
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16bb8574880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=15a770deac0c935a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7475732e7177a19317a1
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=16a45edf080000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=12e66470880000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8d8ae425e7fa/disk-c194837e.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c540d501ebe7/vmlinux-c194837e.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+747573...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 264192
==================================
WARNING: Nested lock was not taken
6.0.0-rc6-syzkaller-17742-gc194837ebb57 #0 Not tainted
----------------------------------
syz-executor253/3315 is trying to lock:
ffff0000c495a9d8 (&s->s_inode_list_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
ffff0000c495a9d8 (&s->s_inode_list_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: inode_sb_list_del fs/inode.c:503 [inline]
ffff0000c495a9d8 (&s->s_inode_list_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: evict+0x90/0x334 fs/inode.c:654

but this task is not holding:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000100000017
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000005
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005
CM = 0, WnR = 0
user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000010a8da000
[0000000100000017] pgd=0800000107ed2003, p4d=0800000107ed2003, pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 3315 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6-syzkaller-17742-gc194837ebb57 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/26/2022
pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : print_lock_nested_lock_not_held kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4885 [inline]
pc : __lock_acquire+0x7cc/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5044
lr : print_lock_nested_lock_not_held kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4884 [inline]
lr : __lock_acquire+0x7c0/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5044
sp : ffff80001289b8b0
x29: ffff80001289b990 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: ffff80000d30c000
x26: ffff0000c68d24b8 x25: ffff0000c68d24d8 x24: 0000000000000002
x23: ffff0000c68d24d0 x22: ffff80000d32a753 x21: ffff80000d32a712
x20: 0000000000040067 x19: ffff0000c68d1a80 x18: 0000000000000156
x17: 2b7463697665203a x16: 0000000000000002 x15: 0000000000000000
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d353133335420 x12: 5b5d303434313530
x11: ff808000081c1630 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 30785d1575e13b00
x8 : 00000000ffffffff x7 : 205b5d3034343135 x6 : ffff800008195d30
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000100000001 x0 : ffff80000cb555a1
Call trace:
print_lock_nested_lock_not_held kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4885 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x7cc/0x30a4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5044
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x54/0x6c kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:349 [inline]
inode_sb_list_del fs/inode.c:503 [inline]
evict+0x90/0x334 fs/inode.c:654
iput_final fs/inode.c:1748 [inline]
iput+0x2c4/0x324 fs/inode.c:1774
ntfs_fill_super+0x1254/0x14a4 fs/ntfs/super.c:188
get_tree_bdev+0x1e8/0x2a0 fs/super.c:1323
ntfs_fs_get_tree+0x28/0x38 fs/ntfs3/super.c:1358
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x914 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:636
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:654
el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
Code: 94f84769 f94002e8 d0024dc0 91168400 (f9400d01)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 94f84769 bl 0x3e11da4
4: f94002e8 ldr x8, [x23]
8: d0024dc0 adrp x0, 0x49ba000
c: 91168400 add x0, x0, #0x5a1
* 10: f9400d01 ldr x1, [x8, #24] <-- trapping instruction


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Al Viro

unread,
Sep 25, 2022, 10:09:33 PMSep 25
to syzbot, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, nt...@lists.linux.dev
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 06:40:36PM -0700, syzbot wrote:

YANTFSBUG; please Cc ntfs maintainers to that. Folks, seriously -
you are fuzzing a specific filesystem, you bloody well ought to Cc
its maintainers. Especially since your subject lines are completely
useless for triage - "[syzbot] WARNING: Nested lock was not taken"
says nothing whatsoever about the report in question.

Ideally - fix the subject lines as well. You want to convince
recepients to open the mail rather than do the default "delete
unopened", after all...

Aleksandr Nogikh

unread,
Sep 26, 2022, 8:44:40 AMSep 26
to Al Viro, syzbot, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, LKML, 'Aleksandr Nogikh' via syzkaller-bugs, nt...@lists.linux.dev
Hi,

Thank you for the feedback!

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 4:09 AM Al Viro <vi...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 06:40:36PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>
> YANTFSBUG; please Cc ntfs maintainers to that. Folks, seriously -
> you are fuzzing a specific filesystem, you bloody well ought to Cc
> its maintainers. Especially since your subject lines are completely
> useless for triage - "[syzbot] WARNING: Nested lock was not taken"
> says nothing whatsoever about the report in question.

We currently determine the mailing lists / people to Cc depending on
the report parsing results, in this case the bug was attributed to the
generic fs code, so it was only fs-devel that was included.
I filed an issue with a fallback mechanism in case when the reproducer
is present: https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/3393

>
> Ideally - fix the subject lines as well. You want to convince
> recepients to open the mail rather than do the default "delete
> unopened", after all...

I've adjusted the report parsing rules for the "Nested lock was not
taken" case (https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/3394), which
should come into effect in the coming days.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bug...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/YzEJ2D8kga%2BZRDZx%40ZenIV.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages