[syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in __netdev_update_features

6 views
Skip to first unread message

syzbot

unread,
Jun 2, 2025, 4:57:36 AMJun 2
to and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, edum...@google.com, ho...@kernel.org, ku...@kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, pab...@redhat.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 7d4e49a77d99 Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2025-05-31-15-28' ..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1298600c580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2ea0d63949bc4278
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7e0f89fb6cae5d002de0
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.6 (++20250514063057+1e4d39e07757-1~exp1~20250514183223.118), Debian LLD 20.1.6

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/eb4b617767b5/disk-7d4e49a7.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d0be53c5da74/vmlinux-7d4e49a7.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9a5769a0ff61/bzImage-7d4e49a7.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7e0f89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

netdevsim netdevsim1 netdevsim0: unset [0, 0] type 1 family 0 port 8472 - 0
netdevsim netdevsim1 netdevsim0: unset [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.15.0-syzkaller-10769-g7d4e49a77d99 #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz.1.2750/15558 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10549 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1a20 net/core/dev.c:10719

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3227 [inline]
ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x1990 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3490
and the lock comparison function returns 0:

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);

*** DEADLOCK ***

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by syz.1.2750/15558:
#0: ffffffff8f50b248 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x1d0/0x1990 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3489
#1: ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline]
#1: ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
#1: ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3227 [inline]
#1: ffff88805a35cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x1990 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3490

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15558 Comm: syz.1.2750 Not tainted 6.15.0-syzkaller-10769-g7d4e49a77d99 #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/07/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_deadlock_bug+0x28b/0x2a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3044
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3096 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1a3f/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3898
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5240
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5871
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:602 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x182/0xe80 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2756 [inline]
netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10549 [inline]
__netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1a20 net/core/dev.c:10719
netdev_change_features+0x72/0xd0 net/core/dev.c:10791
bond_compute_features+0x615/0x680 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:1614
bond_slave_netdev_event drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:4112 [inline]
bond_netdev_event+0x72e/0xe80 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:4157
notifier_call_chain+0x1b6/0x3e0 kernel/notifier.c:85
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2268 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2282 [inline]
netdev_features_change+0x85/0xc0 net/core/dev.c:1571
__dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3457 [inline]
dev_ethtool+0x1520/0x1990 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3490
dev_ioctl+0x392/0x1150 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:758
sock_do_ioctl+0x22c/0x300 net/socket.c:1204
sock_ioctl+0x576/0x790 net/socket.c:1311
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa86e38e969
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa86b98f038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa86e5b6320 RCX: 00007fa86e38e969
RDX: 0000200000000080 RSI: 0000000000008946 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00007fa86e410ab1 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fa86e5b6320 R15: 00007fa86e6dfa28
</TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzk...@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Stanislav Fomichev

unread,
Jun 2, 2025, 9:40:17 PMJun 2
to syzbot, and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, edum...@google.com, ho...@kernel.org, ku...@kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, pab...@redhat.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
I'll keep poking this, but I hope to get a reproducer at some point.
The features are evidently changed on the slave device (since it's the
netdevsim who's lock is grabbed twice), but I can't understand which
ethtool call leads to it.

Paolo Abeni

unread,
Jun 3, 2025, 3:34:41 AMJun 3
to Stanislav Fomichev, syzbot, and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, edum...@google.com, ho...@kernel.org, ku...@kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
On 6/3/25 3:40 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
FWIW, looking at the console log, the program that triggered the splat is:

447.453794ms ago: executing program 1 (id=2750):
bpf$BPF_PROG_RAW_TRACEPOINT_LOAD(0x5, 0x0, 0x0)
syz_emit_ethernet(0x4a, &(0x7f0000000080)={@local, @link_local={0x1,
0x80, 0xc2, 0x0, 0x0, 0xe}, @void, {@ipv4={0x800, @tcp={{0x5, 0x4, 0x0,
0x0, 0x3c, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x6, 0x0, @rand_addr=0x64010102, @local},
{{0x4001, 0x0, 0x41424344, 0x41424344, 0x0, 0x6, 0xa, 0x0, 0x1, 0x0,
0x0, {[@md5sig={0x13, 0x12, "473ecfd2106a00"}]}}}}}}}, 0x0)
socketpair$unix(0x1, 0x3, 0x0,
&(0x7f0000000080)={<r0=>0xffffffffffffffff, <r1=>0xffffffffffffffff})
openat$audio(0xffffff9c, 0x0, 0x402, 0x0)
connect$unix(r0, &(0x7f000057eff8)=@abs, 0x6e)
sendmmsg$unix(r1, &(0x7f00000bd000), 0x318, 0x0)
recvmmsg(r0, &(0x7f00000000c0), 0x10106, 0x2, 0x0)
prctl$PR_SCHED_CORE(0x3e, 0x1, 0x0, 0x2, 0x0)
socket$netlink(0x10, 0x3, 0xe)
sendmsg(r1, &(0x7f0000000180)={0x0, 0x0, 0x0}, 0x0)
sched_setattr(0x0, &(0x7f0000000100)={0x38, 0x5, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xb49,
0x9, 0x8, 0x0, 0x3}, 0x0)
bpf$MAP_CREATE(0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
socketpair$unix(0x1, 0x1, 0x0, &(0x7f0000000240)={0xffffffffffffffff,
<r2=>0xffffffffffffffff})
ioctl$sock_SIOCETHTOOL(r2, 0x8946, &(0x7f0000000080)={'netdevsim0\x00',
&(0x7f0000000000)=@ethtool_sfeatures={0x3b, 0x2, [{0xfe}, {0xfffffff9}]}})
bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, 0x0, 0x0)
r3 = socket$netlink(0x10, 0x3, 0x10)
socketpair$unix(0x1, 0x3, 0x0, 0x0)
getsockopt$sock_cred(r3, 0x1, 0x11, &(0x7f0000000180)={0x0, <r4=>0x0,
<r5=>0x0}, &(0x7f0000000240)=0xc)
bpf$BPF_PROG_RAW_TRACEPOINT_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f00000006c0)={0x1, 0x4, 0x0,
&(0x7f0000000040)='GPL\x00', 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x0,
0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
0x0, 0x10, 0x203, @void, @value}, 0x94)
r6 = syz_open_dev$sndctrl(&(0x7f0000000000), 0x1, 0x0)
ioctl$SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_ELEM_READ(r6, 0xc4c85512, &(0x7f0000000280)={{0x6,
0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 'syz0\x00'}, 0x0, [0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff,
0xffffffefffffffff, 0x0, 0x3, 0x0, 0x0, 0x4, 0x0, 0x0,
0xffffffffbfffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3, 0x80000000, 0x3, 0x0, 0x0, 0x4,
0x0, 0x6, 0x0, 0x40, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffd, 0x100200000, 0x0, 0x0,
0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x9, 0x0, 0x10000, 0x1000, 0x0, 0x3, 0xfffffffffffffffd,
0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3, 0x0, 0x7, 0x10000, 0x7785, 0x0, 0x4,
0x4, 0x8, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffe, 0x0, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x80000000000,
0x0, 0x4, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffe, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffe,
0x0, 0x4000000000, 0x0, 0x80000000000000, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffc, 0x0,
0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffe, 0x0, 0x2000, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
0xfffffffffffffffd, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x100, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffffd, 0x0,
0x0, 0x0, 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3, 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc0c0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
0x1, 0x0, 0x3, 0x0, 0xffffffffffeffffc, 0x0, 0x8000000000001, 0x0, 0x0,
0x0, 0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x20000000, 0x0, 0x80]})
bind$netlink(r3, &(0x7f0000514ff4)={0x10, 0x0, 0x2, 0x2ff7afedf}, 0xc)
mmap(&(0x7f0000000000/0xb36000)=nil, 0xb36000, 0xb635773f06ebbeee,
0x8031, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0)
mlock(&(0x7f0000000000/0x800000)=nil, 0x800000)
madvise(&(0x7f0000000000/0x600000)=nil, 0x600003, 0x19)
mount$fuse(0x0, 0x0, &(0x7f0000002100), 0x0, &(0x7f00000008c0)={{},
0x2c, {'rootmode', 0x3d, 0x4000}, 0x2c, {'user_id', 0x3d, r4}, 0x2c, {},
0x2c, {[{@blksize={'blksize', 0x3d, 0x1000}}, {@max_read={'max_read',
0x3d, 0x3}}, {@blksize={'blksize', 0x3d, 0x1000}},
{@max_read={'max_read', 0x3d, 0x3}}, {@blksize={'blksize', 0x3d,
0x1400}}, {@blksize}]}})
read$FUSE(0xffffffffffffffff, &(0x7f0000006380)={0x2020, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
<r7=>0x0}, 0x2020)
r8 = socket(0x10, 0x2, 0x0)
ioctl$KVM_SET_PIT(0xffffffffffffffff, 0x4048aec9,
&(0x7f0000000080)={[{0x80000000, 0x0, 0x0, 0x3, 0x0, 0x10, 0x6, 0x0,
0x2, 0x0, 0xa, 0x0, 0x4}, {0xa, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x40, 0x1, 0x8, 0xff,
0x7, 0x0, 0x4, 0x0, 0xfffffffffffffff7}, {0x200000, 0xc, 0x21, 0x53,
0x0, 0x2, 0x0, 0x0, 0x58, 0xb, 0x0, 0x0, 0x8080}], 0x3fb})
sendmsg$nl_route(r8, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x0, 0x0,
&(0x7f0000000100)={&(0x7f0000000780)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="2ea8d2811b2a246ba8a8a78787aee7bb20c96807b6d8761f859ec6fa331e777591ed11248a94c0cfc19c61fe7c081ddaf685d4d5b414a01ac8d511cfb5d75e8878514da879142e585b1f9213b0f04d67baae20dd2e742f1286afc7a9bb0ad44aa05e2e3db382651792f2945409e7c6dda83d14fef1fb50a3cb8d0a189d28277f501a04c5d4414479db27bd23c1fbdf28124c317129fe42ebf9",
@ANYRES8, @ANYRES64, @ANYRESOCT=r2, @ANYRES32, @ANYRES16=r7,
@ANYRESDEC=r5], 0x30}, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc885}, 0x4000880)

and the suspect ethtool operation should be:

ioctl$sock_SIOCETHTOOL(r2, 0x8946, &(0x7f0000000080)={'netdevsim0\x00',
&(0x7f0000000000)=@ethtool_sfeatures={0x3b, 0x2, [{0xfe}, {0xfffffff9}]}})

Since syzkaller has no reproducer, I guess the splat depends on some
additional state/race, but I don't see how/where the lower -> bond ->
lowers features update chain is (should be) interrupted to break this
double lock.

/P

Stanislav Fomichev

unread,
Jun 3, 2025, 2:25:07 PMJun 3
to Paolo Abeni, syzbot, and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, edum...@google.com, ho...@kernel.org, ku...@kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
Yes, thanks, I've seen it as well. It flips 3 lower feature bits which
should not affect lro (the only bit we sync) :-(

syzbot

unread,
Sep 5, 2025, 4:38:34 PM (2 days ago) Sep 5
to and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, edum...@google.com, ho...@kernel.org, ku...@kernel.org, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, pab...@redhat.com, stfom...@gmail.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit: d69eb204c255 Merge tag 'net-6.17-rc5' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13a2f162580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9c302bcfb26a48af
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7e0f89fb6cae5d002de0
compiler: Debian clang version 20.1.8 (++20250708063551+0c9f909b7976-1~exp1~20250708183702.136), Debian LLD 20.1.8
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12942962580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=16942962580000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d2a8d25d4378/disk-d69eb204.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4574714ede3c/vmlinux-d69eb204.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e5bae1ec81fb/bzImage-d69eb204.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+7e0f89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

netlink: 8 bytes leftover after parsing attributes in process `syz.0.17'.
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: entered promiscuous mode
macsec1: entered allmulticast mode
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: entered allmulticast mode
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz.0.17/6023 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10649 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1be0 net/core/dev.c:10819

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3235 [inline]
ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502
and the lock comparison function returns 0:

other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);
lock(&dev_instance_lock_key#20);

*** DEADLOCK ***

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by syz.0.17/6023:
#0: ffffffff8f539288 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x1d0/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3501
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3235 [inline]
#1: ffff88802911cd30 (&dev_instance_lock_key#20){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ethtool+0x716/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 6023 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_deadlock_bug+0x28b/0x2a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3041
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3093 [inline]
validate_chain+0x1a3f/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3895
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760
netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2761 [inline]
netdev_lock_ops include/net/netdev_lock.h:42 [inline]
netdev_sync_lower_features net/core/dev.c:10649 [inline]
__netdev_update_features+0xcb1/0x1be0 net/core/dev.c:10819
netdev_update_features+0x6d/0xe0 net/core/dev.c:10876
macsec_notify+0x2f5/0x660 drivers/net/macsec.c:4533
notifier_call_chain+0x1b3/0x3e0 kernel/notifier.c:85
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2267 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2281 [inline]
netdev_features_change+0x85/0xc0 net/core/dev.c:1570
__dev_ethtool net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3469 [inline]
dev_ethtool+0x1536/0x19b0 net/ethtool/ioctl.c:3502
dev_ioctl+0x392/0x1150 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:759
sock_do_ioctl+0x22c/0x300 net/socket.c:1252
sock_ioctl+0x576/0x790 net/socket.c:1359
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:598 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:584
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f08c1f8ebe9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff0a699878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f08c21c5fa0 RCX: 00007f08c1f8ebe9
RDX: 0000200000000080 RSI: 0000000000008946 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00007f08c2011e19 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007f08c21c5fa0 R14: 00007f08c21c5fa0 R15: 0000000000000003
</TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

syzbot

unread,
Sep 6, 2025, 8:41:06 AM (yesterday) Sep 6
to andrew...@lunn.ch, and...@lunn.ch, da...@davemloft.net, ecree....@gmail.com, edum...@google.com, g...@nvidia.com, ho...@kernel.org, ji...@resnulli.us, ku...@kernel.org, kun...@amazon.com, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linux-k...@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, pab...@redhat.com, s...@fomichev.me, sh...@kernel.org, stfom...@gmail.com, syzkall...@googlegroups.com, tar...@nvidia.com
syzbot has bisected this issue to:

commit f792709e0baad67224180d73d51c2f090003adde
Author: Stanislav Fomichev <stfom...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri May 16 23:22:05 2025 +0000

selftests: net: validate team flags propagation

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=16a3ba42580000
start commit: d69eb204c255 Merge tag 'net-6.17-rc5' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=15a3ba42580000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11a3ba42580000
Reported-by: syzbot+7e0f89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: f792709e0baa ("selftests: net: validate team flags propagation")

For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages