1. With this perspetive consider the qualifications of candidates for each Legislative and Executive branches including their implications on the evolution of the Judicial branch.
IMO, using a business enterprise metaphor,
a) the Executive branch continually promotes the United aspect of States of America. The calls for a CEO of 1.7 million federal employees plus 1.5 million members of the Armed Services as well as relationships with the Legislative and Judicial branches and the often overlooked relationship as Facilitator of the dialog among the CEO's of 50 respective states.
b) the Legislative branch acts as the Board of Directors of the CEO. It calls for persons who can patch the existing system and design new aspects that will be responsive to the evolving, mutually-conflicting needs of their respective constituents. They decide the kind of lives we citizens who are not members of the Executive branch will be able to achieve.
c) the Judicial branch acts as the auditors. They are not the umpires. The umpires are the voters.
2. Then consider the big R, Relationships.
a) For the branches shall you elect someone who promises to FIGHT as their main modus operandi or someone who promises to WORK WITH in a way that accomplishes, for instance, Conceptual Blending (Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner)?