Hello fellow psychedelic thinkers,
I'm just catching up on this interesting thread. I'm one of the organisers of Breaking Convention (
www.breakingconvention.co.uk) - we're Europe's largest conference on psychedelic medicine and culture.
I love the idea of a manifesto - there are some challenges in engaging the likes of MAPS and Beckley Foundation and Breaking Convention to stand behind it. There's a split within the psychedelic community between those interested in the therapeutic potential and those interested in the cultural potential - it's a friction as I think many in the medical and psychological community want to distance themselves from the latter.
There are legitimate reasons for this - not least because people like Rick Doblin at MAPS have spent 30 years working within the system toward legalisation - which is going to come first through MDMA in the next 5-10 years, then hopefully psilocybin and LSD in clinical settings (eventually, their vision is to create treatment centres for a wider community)
As a Libertarian I don't recognise or respect the validity of drug laws, but I do think the tactic of working within the system through the medical / psychotherapeutic model is the best option right now. Why? Because legitimacy in our culture comes through science - it's our religion. People lap it up unquestioningly - throw some neuroscience at them and they believe it. More importantly - it's working. It's getting into the culture - the first Breaking Convention 7 years ago was 300 of us, all feeling like we were coming out of the shadows... now it's 1000 strong and we had a press conference, with resulting (very positive) coverage from major newspapers.
Likewise, 7 years ago I wrote an article for the Guardian around the need to legalise psychedelics for spiritual practice - the comments were brutal, showing a huge lack of research or awareness. Now, I see similar articles getting a very different response - there's a cultural shift happening.
Just to add to the power of including the therapeutic potential argument for any manifesto - it really works astoundingly well and there's evidence to draw on. I do believe psychedelics should be used as part of a wider therapeutic process wherever possible, and that the lessons from that process should be integrated into the spiritual use wherever possible. The amount of new age bullshit you see in 70% of Ayahuasca ceremonies - the bypassing, the ridiculous blending of philosophies, the big egos, the lack of shadow work - all of that needs to be called out, because it's dangerous and often retraumatises people. The golden egg really is psychedelic therapy - it saves lives, and it's the Western contribution to indigenous magic.
So back to the manifesto - that's something I would get behind as an individual just on the basis of the statement it makes. I wonder though what would make it most effective - my initial thought is that it could do something that hasn't really been done convincingly yet... linking the therapeutic psychedelic community and the spiritual / philosophical / self-development people under one ethos. Perhaps the human right for effective treatment is a place to look at initially...
In any case, early thoughts but I'm happy to help however I can - I have good connections with the global psychedelic community and would be happy to help spread a final manifesto, as well as contribute where I can :)
Ali