WoMen / FeMale appears for the inclusion and empasis on either gender simultaneously through the use of capitalization, everyone is used to 'men' and other terms of patriarchy that simply leave out women, this term WoMen is what should be substituted as written with capitolization wherever men,man etc is currently used, FeMales to designate all sexes. I have included noted feminists Denise Ward and Steve Moyer in our discussion, I'd like to see an equal number of invites so we have a FeMale balance.
Does this help you Tom? Best wishesOn Nov 5, 2016 4:33 PM, "tom finnell" <tom...@yahoo.com> wrote:For the uninitiated, kindly define these terms.
From: Emily Peyton <emilype...@gmail.com>
To: br...@myfairpoint.net
Cc: Ron Jacobs <ronj...@gmail.com>; "Boyle, Francis A" <fbo...@illinois.edu>; "krom...@endcommunications.com" <krom...@endcommunications.com>; "gae...@gmail.com" <gae...@gmail.com>; "dl...@localnet.com" <dl...@localnet.com>; "pgarr...@gmail.com" <pgarr...@gmail.com>; "jol...@gmail.com" <jol...@gmail.com>; "piei...@igc.org" <piei...@igc.org>; "rmcco...@leg.state.vt.us" <rmcco...@leg.state.vt.us>; "lynn.p...@gmail.com" <lynn.p...@gmail.com>; "ian.ba...@gmail.com" <ian.ba...@gmail.com>; "rob.wi...@madriver.com" <rob.wi...@madriver.com>; "lendman...@sbcglobal.net" <lendman...@sbcglobal.net>; "adri...@hotmail.com" <adri...@hotmail.com>; "patrioti...@yahoo.com" <patrioti...@yahoo.com>; "peter.hirschfeld@timesargus.com" <peter.hirschfeld@timesargus.com>; "jga...@vtlink.net" <jga...@vtlink.net>; "letsgof...@yahoo.com" <letsgof...@yahoo.com>; "anti...@yahoo.com" <anti...@yahoo.com>; "tom...@yahoo.com" <tom...@yahoo.com>; "ni...@bernie.org" <ni...@bernie.org>; "ja...@sover.net" <ja...@sover.net>; "Gary...@uvm.edu" <Gary...@uvm.edu>; "dlin...@mindspring.com" <dlin...@mindspring.com>; "j...@pshift.com" <j...@pshift.com>; "peter...@gmail.com" <peter...@gmail.com>; "walkin...@hotmail.com" <walkin...@hotmail.com>; "nativeang...@yahoo.com" <nativeang...@yahoo.com>; "don...@sover.net" <don...@sover.net>; "rob...@senatorwagner.com" <rob...@senatorwagner.com>; "dais...@comcast.net" <dais...@comcast.net>; Kurt Daims <kurt...@gmail.com>; "br...@thelichfieldgroup.com" <br...@thelichfieldgroup.com>; "robert.w...@gmail.com" <robert.w...@gmail.com>; "zek...@gmail.com" <zek...@gmail.com>; "crise...@aceweb.com" <crise...@aceweb.com>; "br...@yahoo.com" <br...@yahoo.com>; "jessica...@ymail.com" <jessica...@ymail.com>; "mic...@michelethomas.com" <mic...@michelethomas.com>; "robin...@gmail.com" <robin...@gmail.com>; "jennifer....@gmail.com" <jennifer....@gmail.com>; "laurie...@yahoo.com" <laurie...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Impeachment of Obama RE: A Vote For Hillary is a Vote for Thermonuclear War
END the entire paradigm of "leadership" for inherent in leadership is 'followers' and sheople, instead I hope to encourage collaborativeness, to such a degree that collaboratism could be it's description, it's label, to stand up to capitalism, communism, and socialism, while of course none of these happen in fact for the problems of imbalance maintained by a patriarchy and a separate and more powerful control mechanism through currency issuance.I do not believe in leadership, in stardom for leaders, instead, that we, without claim to fame inspire each and every person we can to lead their own destiny onto a happier path in a collaborative way. WE DO NOT NEED LEADERS, we need courage, imagination, and resolve to undo the powers that thieve.WoMen, and FeMale participation must be completely in balance, it is currently incomplete wherever Males outnumber or outspeak FeMales, and Men dominate WoMen.If there is one in this group that does not agree with me, I do not need to argue, I will instead leave you to your silliness. For Males to dominate without FeMales is not good enough, and every effort undertaken to renew a Male dominated paradigm, even an effort to bring peace, will not ever bring peace without the FeMale balance.Is there any person here who disagrees?On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:12 PM, <br...@myfairpoint.net> wrote:Dear Professor Boyle and Friends,Thank you for this note Francis!My intention is to contact Rep. Peter Welch on this, to which I invite my fellow Vermonters here to do the same, potentially in some sort of coordination,or confirmation of people sending the message.There are some on the list here who well understand, for they were leaders in the call for the impeachment of Bush/Cheney, to which the tragedy isthat Rep. Welch unfortunately chose the course of the Democratic Party, in protecting Bush, and thus creating the conditions for Obama to becomea terrible President, because he inherited a dictatorship unoppossed....Yes this is an invitatation for the emergence of real responsible leadership and leaders, to come to the fore, as peace, the prospects of Peace, demand it.This also serves as the relevant check upon either a Trump or Clinton presidency.Bruce MarshallRochester, VermontI agree with you on that. This week I already started working with some people to put in a Bill of Impeachment against Obama as soon as Congress reconvenes one week after the election. We need to send a shot across his bow. He could start World War III anytime between now and Inauguration Day. We need one Member of the US House of Representatives to put in that Bill of Impeachment immediately. So speak to your own Member of Congress and if he or she is willing to do so, have him or her contact me and I will get to work on drawing up that Bill of Impeachment against Obama. That will keep him pretty busy between now and Inauguration Day and hopefully too busy to start World War III. Fab-----Original Message-----Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:50 PMTo: undisclosed-recipientsSubject: [NYTr] Henry Gonzalez Resol'n to Impeach Bush I (1991)Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fitsent by Francis Boyle - Jan 18, 2006The Gonzalez Resolution to Impeach George BushCongressional Record, Jan. 16, 1991, at H520-21.RESOLUTION OF IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSHThe SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House,the gentleman from Texas [Mr. GONZALEZ] is recognized for 60 minutes.Mr. GONZALEZ, Madam Speaker, it is with great sadness, and yet with equallygreat, if not greater, conviction, that I introduce today a resolution ofimpeachment of President Bush. It is known as House Resolution 34, and Iwill provide this resolution as introduced to be appended at the end of myremarks today.At a time when our Nation is deeply divided over the question ofwar, we find ourselves on the brink of a world war of such magnitude thatour minds cannot fully comprehend the destruction that is about to beleveled. The position we are in is a direct result of the actions of oneman and the reactions of another. The Iraqi people are as opposed to war asare the American people. The difference is that the Iraqi people have nochoice but to support their country's leader, but the American people notonly have the right to oppose and speak out in disagreement with thePresident, but they have the responsibility to do so if our democracy is tobe preserved. Today I exercise this constitutional right and responsibilityto speak out in opposition to war in the Middle East and in support ofremoval of our Nation's Chief Executive.When I took the oath of office earlier this month, as I hadnumerous times before, I swore to uphold the Constitution. The President'soath was the same, to uphold the Constitution of the United States. We didnot pledge an oath of allegiance to the President but to the Constitution,which is the highest law of the land. The Constitution provides for removalof the President when he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors,including violations of the principles of the Constitution. President Bushhas violated these principles.My resolution has five articles of impeachment. First, thePresident has violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Oursoldiers in the Middle East are overwhelmingly poor white, black, andMexican-American or Hispanic-American. They may be volunteers technically,but their voluntarism is based on the coercion of a system that has deniedviable opportunities to these classes of our citizens. Under theConstitution, all classes of citizens are guaranteed equal protection, andcalling on the poor and the minorities to fight a war for oil to preservethe lifestyles of the wealthy is a denial of the rights of these soldiers.Let me add that since 1981 we have suffered the Reagan-Bush andnow the Bush war against the poor, and to add insult to injury, we now areasking the poor to fight while here, as a result of this fight, even themeager programs that the Congress had seen fit to preserve as a nationalpolicy will suffer because the money for those programs will be diverted tothe cause of this unnecessary war.Article II of this resolution states that the President hasviolated the Constitution, Federal law, and the U.N. Charter by bribing,intimidating, and threatening others, including the members of the U.N.Security Council, to support belligerent acts against Iraq. It is clearthat the President paid off members of the U.N. Security Council in returnfor their votes in support of war against Iraq or to abstain from votingcontrariwise. The debt of Egypt was, for example, forgiven--$7 billion,without congressional approval. That, I think, casts doubtful validity onthat Presidential action. The reason for the cancellation of that debt isso that we can then provide an equally enormous amount of armament for Egyptwhich it cannot obtain because of the debt outstanding. A $140 million loanto China was agreed to. The Soviet Union was promised over $7 billion inaid. This is a sum totally unreported in our country but very welldiscussed in foreign country presses such as Germany and others. Colombiawas promised assistance to its armed forces. Zaire was promised militaryassistance and partial forgiveness of its debt. Saudi Arabia was promised$12 billion in arms, and more than that. Actually in October, the Presidentlet them have $2.2 billion, and there was a commitment for $21 billion more,but because of the outcry in Congress and the Israeli opposition, that isbeing postponed. But there is still a commitment for $22 billion. I amsure this month will see the initial efforts to bring about compliance withthat commitment.Yemen was threatened with the termination of support, and the United Statesfinally paid off $187 million of its debt to the United Nations after thevote President Bush sought was made.This is all so ironic. When our President ran for the U.S. Senate in the1960's, he told the people of Texas that if he would be elected to theSenate, he would lead the fight to remove the United States from the UnitedNations if what he called Red China at that time was admitted. Fate andpower almighty have a very, very mysterious way of working together. Who wasto believe during that year in that race in Texas that years later this sameman, now the President, would be the man the President would appoint torepresent us in the United Nations and welcome Red China as a member of theUnited Nations.The vote was bought, and it will be paid for with the lives of our poorelements who are going to shoulder the fight.Article III states that the President has conspired to engage in a massivewar against Iraq, employing methods of mass destruction that will result inthe killing of tens of thousands of civilians, many of whom will bechildren. No civilian lives have yet been lost that we know of, but when westart using the weapons of massive destruction that are in place for thiswar, there is no doubt that thousands of innocent civilians will lose theirlives. As killings occur, the principles laid down in the Nuremberg trialswill be applicable. Their deaths will not only be a moral outrage, they willconstitute violations of international law.Article IV states that the President has committed the United States to actsof war without congressional consent and contrary to the U.N. Charter andinternational law. From August 1990 through January 1991 the Presidentembarked on a course of action that systematically eliminated every optionfor peaceful resolution of the Persian Gulf crisis. Once the Presidentapproached Congress for a declaration of war, 500,000 American soldierslives were in jeopardy, rendering any substantive debate by Congressmeaningless. It is also ironic that what we have ended up with now is thatthe President has exchanged about 200 to 250 so-called hostages, Americans,all of them employees of oil companies in Kuwait or Iraq, and in exchange wenow have close to 500,000 American soldiers as hostages. Hostages to thewhims, the caprices, and the decisions and judgments made by other leaders,over which this President and our country has no control, all the way fromShamir of Israel to the immigrants in the Saudi sands.Article 5 states that the President has conspired to commit crimes againstthe peace by leading the United States into aggressive war against Iraq, inviolation of article 24 of the U.N. Charter, the Nuremberg Charter, otherinternational instruments and treaties, and the Constitution of the UnitedStates.Again, there is a violation of law by a President, who, believing and actingas if he is king, decides for the country, unilaterally, that war is theanswer.Madam Speaker, it is a sad day for our country, and it will be an evensadder day once the fighting starts. President Bush must be stopped. Adivided Congress reflecting the divided country is no way to conduct a war.The preservation of lives is at stake, and the preservation of our country,indeed, our democracy, is at stake as well.I urge my colleagues to support this resolution. All I ask is a hearing, asI have before, before the proper committee of proper jurisdiction, and thatis it. I will argue the case there. The rest is up to the Members' judgment.Madam Speaker, I urge interest and support of this resolution, and to standup to the President on behalf of the soldiers who will die, the civilianswho will be massacred, and the Constitution that will be destroyed if thiscountry goes to war in the Middle East.102nd CongressH.Res.861st Session____/s/ Henry B.Gonzalez____Impeaching George Herbert Walker Bush, President of the UnitedStates, of high crimes and misdemeanors.______________________________ _________________IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESFebruary 21, 1991 (originallyJanuary 16, 1991)Mr. GONZALEZ submitted the following resolution; which wasreferred to the Committee on Judiciary.______________________________ __________________A RESOLUTIONImpeaching George Herbert Walker Bush, President of the UnitedStates, of high crimes and misdemeanors.Impeaching George Herbert Walker Bush, President of the United States, ofhigh crimes and misdemeanors.Resolved, That George Herbert Walker Bush, President of the United States isimpeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articlesof impeachment be exhibited to the Senate:Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of theUnited States of America in the name of itself and of all of the people ofthe United States of America, against George Herbert Walker Bush, Presidentof the United States of America, in maintenance and support of itsimpeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.ARTICLE IIn the conduct of the office of President of the United States, GeorgeHerbert Walker Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully toexecute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of hisability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that thelaws be faithfully executed, has violated the equal protection clause of theConstitution. U.S. soldiers in the Middle East are overwhelmingly poorwhite, black, and Mexican-American, and their military service is based onthe coercion of an system that has denied viable economic opportunities tothese classes of citizens. Under the Constitution, all classes of citizensare guaranteed equal protection, and calling on the poor and minorities tofight a war for oil to preserve the lifestyles of the wealthy is a denial ofthe rights of these soldiers. In all of this George Herbert Walker Bush hasacted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive ofconstitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law andjustice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.Wherefore George Herbert Walker Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachmentand trial, and removal from office.ARTICLE IIIn the conduct of the office of President of the United States, GeorgeHerbert Walker bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully toexecute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of hisability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that thelaws be faithfully executed, has violated the U.S. Constitution, federal lawand the United Nations Charter by bribing, intimidating and threateningothers, including the members of the United Nations Security Council, tosupport belligerent acts against Iraq. In all of this George Herbert WalkerBush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversiveof constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law andjustice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.Wherefore George Herbert Walker Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachmentand trial, and removal from office.ARTICLE IIIIn the conduct of the office of President of the United States, GeorgeHerbert Walker Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully toexecute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of hisability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that thelaws be faithfully executed, has prepared, planned, and conspired to engagein a massive war against Iraq employing methods of mass destruction thatwill result in the killing of tens of thousands of civilians, many of whomwill be children. This planning includes the placement and potential use ofnuclear weapons, and the use of such indiscriminate weapons and massivekillings by serial bombardment, or otherwise, of civilians violates theHague Conventions of 1907 and 1923, the Geneva Conventions of 1949 andProtocol I thereto, the Nuremberg Charter, the Genocide Convention and theUnited Nations Declaration of Human Rights. In all of this George HerbertWalker Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President andsubversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the causeof law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the UnitedStates.Wherefore George Herbert Walker Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachmentand trial, and removal from office.ARTICLE IVIn the conduct of the office of President of the United States, GeorgeHerbert Walker Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully toexecute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of hisability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that thelaws be faithfully executed, has committed the United States to acts of warwithout congressional consent and contrary to the United Nations Charter andinternational law. From August, 1990, through January, 1991, the Presidentembarked on a course of action that systematically eliminated every optionfor peaceful resolution of the Persian Gulf crisis. Once the Presidentapproached Congress for a declaration of war, 500,000 American soldiers'lives were in jeopardy - rendering any substantive debate by Congressmeaningless. The President has not received a declaration of war byCongress, and in contravention of the written word, the spirit, and theintent of the U.S. Constitution has declared that he will go to warregardless of the views of Congress and the American people. In failing toseek a declaration of war, and in declaring his intent to violate theConstitution in disregarding the acts of Congress - including the War PowersResolution - George Herbert Walker Bush has acted in a manner contrary tohis trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to thegreat prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injuryof the people of the United States.Wherefore George Herbert Walker Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachmentand trial, and removal from office.ARTICLE VIn the conduct of the office of President of the United States, GeorgeHerbert Walker Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully toexecute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of hisability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that thelaws be faithfully executed, has planned, prepared, and conspired to commitcrimes against the peace by leading the United States into aggressive waragainst Iraq in violation of Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, theNuremberg Charter, other international instruments and treaties, and theConstitution of the United States. In all of this George Herbert Walker Bushhas acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive ofconstitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law andjustice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.Wherefore George Herbert Walker Bush, by such conduct, warrants impeachmentand trial, and removal from office.*============================== ============================== ====.NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems. Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us ..339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012 http://www.blythe.org.List Archives: https://olm.blythe-systems. com/pipermail/nytr/==========================Francis A. BoyleLaw Building504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.Champaign IL 61820 USA217-333-7954 (phone)217-244-1478 (fax)(personal comments only)From: br...@myfairpoint.net [mailto:br...@myfairpoint.net]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 12:38 PM
To: Ron Jacobs <ronj...@gmail.com>; Boyle, Francis A <fbo...@illinois.edu>
Cc: krom...@endcommunications.com ; gae...@gmail.com; dl...@localnet.com; pgarr...@gmail.com; jol...@gmail.com; piei...@igc.org; rmcco...@leg.state.vt.us; lynn.p...@gmail.com; ian.ba...@gmail.com; rob.wi...@madriver.com; lendman...@sbcglobal.net; adri...@hotmail.com; patrioti...@yahoo.com; peter.hirschfeld@timesargus. com; jga...@vtlink.net; letsgof...@yahoo.com; anti...@yahoo.com; tom...@yahoo.com; ni...@bernie.org; ja...@sover.net; Gary...@uvm.edu; dlin...@mindspring.com; emilype...@gmail.com; j...@pshift.com; peter...@gmail.com; walkin...@hotmail.com; nativeang...@yahoo.com; don...@sover.net; rob...@senatorwagner.com; dais...@comcast.net; Kurt Daims <kurt...@gmail.com>; br...@thelichfieldgroup.com; robert.w...@gmail.com; zek...@gmail.com; crise...@aceweb.com; br...@yahoo.com; jessica...@ymail.com; mic...@michelethomas.com; robin...@gmail.com; jennifer....@gmail.com; laurie...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: A Vote For Hillary is a Vote for Thermonuclear WarFrancis and Friends,"Organize in Streets" I guess is the default slogan, but we must realize that the so called "Streets" have well been already organized by thefoundations, to which Soros is the present brandname for the elite, the internationalist oligarchy that wants choas and Jacobin terror unleashedaround against the United State. Provocations, violent provocations, as proven by the investigation of the DNC and its operatives, in payingprovocateurs is in the works, where the election serves as the pretext to sew chaos.Hopefully Professor Boyle will reflect upon the impotence of the 'first pump' saying screw the election organize in the streets, when he consideresthat people actually need his knowledge and leadership in organizing the true flank against the whole crisis, which does not end until, Obama'sis removed from the nuclear button, which he has already set in motion an American "First Strike" against Russia.This thus requires a call for the Impeachement of Obama, where such a call invokes this Berrigan-Boyle, National Call for Peace, as the wayto organize, including the 'streets" around such principle that does not shirk from the crisis at hand, which is aboutThermonuclear Annihilationif not the destruction of this nation and civilization by other means of chaos.Remember sociopathic criminals such as Obama, have a history, through history, of blowing up everything, rather than to face the truthwhich does come with "life in jail" so they are crazy enough to knock over the chess board.As I can anticipate a certain freakout about this call to impeach, I have been told by sources that there is a possibility that sane membersof Congress, may well act in the interrum, to invoke the call, as indeed they fear a President Trump inheriting the unchallenged dictatorialpowers of the Presidency, the Unitary Executive, which has left the world in ruins under Bush and Obama.The issue is that a serious rebuke must be brought to the stage, to address the crisis.A short one page letter needs to be written, by someone like Professor Boyle, as a letter to Congress and the public I think would be veryhelpful in "Organizing the Streets", to not fall into the police state dialectic that the "Burn Baby Burners" from the Ford Foundation intend.Bruce MarshallRochester, Vermont
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 15:52:47 +0000, "Boyle, Francis A" <fbo...@illinois.edu> wrote:Screw the election and organize in the streets.Ron: I was trying to be respectful to those on this list who supported Bernie: Organize in the Streets. For sure. The sooner the better. Fab.It is the Unlimited Imperialists along the lines of Alexander, Rome, Napoleon and Hitler who are now in charge of conducting American foreign policy. The factual circumstances surrounding the outbreaks of both the First World War and the Second World War currently hover like twin Swords of Damocles over the heads of all humanity.American Unlimited Imperialism
Historically, this latest eruption of American militarism at the start of the 21st Century is akin to that of America opening the 20th Century by means of the U.S.-instigated Spanish-American War in 1898. Then the Republican administration of President William McKinley stole their colonial empire from Spain in Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines; inflicted a near genocidal war against the Filipino people; while at the same time illegally annexing the Kingdom of Hawaii and subjecting the Native Hawaiian people (who call themselves the Kanaka Maoli) to near genocidal conditions. Additionally, McKinley’s military and colonial expansion into the Pacific was also designed to secure America’s economic exploitation of China pursuant to the euphemistic rubric of the “open door” policy. But over the next four decades America’s aggressive presence, policies, and practices in the “Pacific” would ineluctably pave the way for Japan’s attack at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 194l, and thus America’s precipitation into the ongoing Second World War. Today a century later the serial imperial aggressions launched and menaced by the Republican Bush Jr. administration and now the Democratic Obama administration are threatening to set off World War III.
By shamelessly exploiting the terrible tragedy of 11 September 2001, the Bush Jr. administration set forth to steal a hydrocarbon empire from the Muslim states and peoples living in Central Asia and the Persian Gulf and Africa under the bogus pretexts of (1) fighting a war against international terrorism; and/or (2) eliminating weapons of mass destruction; and/or (3) the promotion of democracy; and/or (4) self-styled “humanitarian intervention”/responsibility to protect. Only this time the geopolitical stakes are infinitely greater than they were a century ago: control and domination of two-thirds of the world’s hydrocarbon resources and thus the very fundament and energizer of the global economic system – oil and gas. The Bush Jr./ Obama administrations have already targeted the remaining hydrocarbon reserves of Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia for further conquest or domination, together with the strategic choke-points at sea and on land required for their transportation. In this regard, the Bush Jr. administration announced the establishment of the U.S. Pentagon’s Africa Command (AFRICOM) in order to better control, dominate, and exploit both the natural resources and the variegated peoples of the continent of Africa, the very cradle of our human species. Libya and the Libyans became the first victims to succumb to AFRICOM under the Obama administration. They will not be the last.
This current bout of U.S. imperialism is what my teacher, mentor and friend Hans Morgenthau denominated “unlimited imperialism” in his seminal work Politics Among Nations (4th ed. 1968, at 52-53):
“The outstanding historic examples of unlimited imperialism are the expansionist policies of Alexander the Great, Rome, the Arabs in the seventh and eighth centuries, Napoleon I, and Hitler. They all have in common an urge toward expansion which knows no rational limits, feeds on its own successes and, if not stopped by a superior force, will go on to the confines of the political world. This urge will not be satisfied so long as there remains anywhere a possible object of domination–a politically organized group of men which by its very independence challenges the conqueror’s lust for power. It is, as we shall see, exactly the lack of moderation, the aspiration to conquer all that lends itself to conquest, characteristic of unlimited imperialism, which in the past has been the undoing of the imperialistic policies of this kind… “
It is the Unlimited Imperialists along the lines of Alexander, Rome, Napoleon and Hitler who are now in charge of conducting American foreign policy. The factual circumstances surrounding the outbreaks of both the First World War and the Second World War currently hover like twin Swords of Damocles over the heads of all humanity.Francis A. BoyleLaw Building504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.Champaign IL 61820 USA217-333-7954 (phone)217-244-1478 (fax)(personal comments only)From: Ron Jacobs [mailto:ronj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 10:44 AM
To: Boyle, Francis A <fbo...@illinois.edu>
Cc: krom...@endcommunications.com ; gae...@gmail.com; dl...@localnet.com; pgarr...@gmail.com; jol...@gmail.com; piei...@igc.org; rmcco...@leg.state.vt.us; lynn.p...@gmail.com; ian.ba...@gmail.com; rob.wi...@madriver.com; lendman...@sbcglobal.net; adri...@hotmail.com; patrioti...@yahoo.com; peter.hirschfeld@timesargus. com; jga...@vtlink.net; letsgof...@yahoo.com; anti...@yahoo.com; tom...@yahoo.com; ni...@bernie.org; ja...@sover.net; Gary...@uvm.edu; dlin...@mindspring.com; emilype...@gmail.com; j...@pshift.com; peter...@gmail.com; br...@myfairpoint.net; walkin...@hotmail.com; nativeang...@yahoo.com; don...@sover.net; rob...@senatorwagner.com; dais...@comcast.net; Kurt Daims <kurt...@gmail.com>; br...@thelichfieldgroup.com; robert.w...@gmail.com; zek...@gmail.com; crise...@aceweb.com; br...@yahoo.com; jessica...@ymail.com; mic...@michelethomas.com; robin...@gmail.com; jennifer....@gmail.com; laurie...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: A Vote For Hillary is a Vote for Thermonuclear WarI never trusted Sanders in the first place. However, suggesting that voting for Trump is a reasonable thing to do is at best politically naive. Screw the election and organize in the streets. The election is the ruling elites' con game. War is a fact of capitalism,especially in its imperial phase. Voting for one capitalist candidate or another will not change that. Organizing against war might.On Nov 5, 2016 11:27 AM, "Boyle, Francis A" <fbo...@illinois.edu> wrote:With all due respect to everyone on this list: Bernie has now sold out the Peace Movement by jumping on the Clinton Bandwagon heading towards World War III. We need to figure this out on our own and do it on our own. Personally, I could never trust Bernie to lead us again. We will have to do this on our own.Fab.Francis A. BoyleLaw Building504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.Champaign IL 61820 USA217-333-7954 (phone)217-244-1478 (fax)(personal comments only)From: Kurt Daims [mailto:kurt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 10:04 AM
To: br...@myfairpoint.net
Cc: Gary...@uvm.edu; br...@yahoo.com; tom...@yahoo.com; Boyle, Francis A <fbo...@illinois.edu>; piei...@igc.org; ronj...@gmail.com; lynn.p...@gmail.com; ian.ba...@gmail.com; robin...@gmail.com; dl...@localnet.com; jga...@vtlink.net; emilype...@gmail.com; adri...@hotmail.com; anti...@yahoo.com; mic...@michelethomas.com; peter.hirschfeld@timesargus. com; nativeang...@yahoo.com; don...@sover.net; zek...@gmail.com; j...@pshift.com; peter...@gmail.com; jol...@gmail.com; jennifer....@gmail.com; rob...@senatorwagner.com; krom...@endcommunications.com ; gae...@gmail.com; pgarr...@gmail.com; rmcco...@leg.state.vt.us; laurie...@yahoo.com; dlin...@mindspring.com; patrioti...@yahoo.com; crise...@aceweb.com; walkin...@hotmail.com; rob.wi...@madriver.com; dais...@comcast.net; jessica...@ymail.com; letsgof...@yahoo.com; lendman...@sbcglobal.net; ja...@sover.net; robert.w...@gmail.com; ni...@bernie.org; br...@thelichfieldgroup.com
Subject: Re: A Vote For Hillary is a Vote for Thermonuclear WarI like it, Bruce. But you are of course preaching to the choir. Can you revise it for general distribution ? Some points which are commonplace for radicals might with more explanation and references be entertained by liberals.RegardsOn Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:20 PM, <br...@myfairpoint.net> wrote:A Vote For Hillary is a Vote for Thermonuclear War!
This is Not "A Future To Believe In" Bernie
Boom Its Over! Obama's Finger is on the Button and Hillary Will Push it!!!!
Bruce Marshall
Rochester, Vermont
Senator Sanders's needs to stop calling people racists and do something about stopping those who have started World War III, Secretary Clinton and tragic
failure President Obama, whose "Hope and Change" has brought us war and hate. Yes lets get along with Russia, but Obama orders the Pentagon to a nuclear first strike orders, to launch at any moment, could it be if Trump wins, or could it be the indictment of Hillary and what her singing might bring. Treason Anyone!
Full on chaos is the promise of the elite which Bernie Sanders is now backing, rather than to be the truely independent leaders, who as U.S. Senator, needs to realise that he is indeed Under Oath to defend this nation, and not the crumbs he may have gotten from the rotten DNC. Yes Bernie you know who stole the nomination from you, and it was not the Russians, so why are you blaming the Russians?
Look it is simple, Hillary has already promised to take actions that will lead to a conflict with Russia in Syria, as Russia defeats the CIA's ISIS terrorists. Hillary, as Secretary of State, pushed for the bombing of Libya, destroying Libya. She worked with Nazi's in the Ukraine to stage the violent coup against the legitimate government of the Ukraine. It is now being discovered that the western press lied about Syria, that the U.S. is responsible for the carnage as it tries to overthrow the Assad government, siding with various terrorist groups, including ISIS. Remember Bernie ISIS is CIA and you would be the nominee if you had cared about more than the e-mails, but how that is part of World War III you continue to be silent and support.
Obama needs to have been impeached, but some would rather defend the elite, and destroy the nation, then to become a real opposition to war.
If Trump is President, he says he will get along with Russia, because peace is good, and thermonuclear war is not how to clean a hard drive, but this is how crazy Hillary and Obama are. So time to wave your arm in the air, and stop being part of the elite's chaos machine. Yes you got somewhere because the Americans are fed up, why lots of "Deplorables" liked you, until you betrayed the struggle and went along with those who stole your nomination, paid thugs to start fights and riots, and World War which Senator Sanders endorses until he might wake the fuck up.
--(signed) Kurt
P.S.: Have you called a stranger
with the sole purpose of discussing
the difficult situation we're all in?
( I ask all the time .)--Emily PeytonPO box 821 Putney VT 05346Cell phone 802 579 5524I pledge allegiance to the Earth upon whom all life depends,and to the Beings with whom we share Her.Our Earth, of the Universe, beauteous beyond comprehension.ep 2013