gsoc prosopal related to "Creating a rich beam solving system and extending continuum mechanics module"

[harsha gudupudi]

Dear GSoc Mentors,

       I am sending you a draft of my proposal for GSoC-2020  here. Please review it. I am even working on some issues. I am even a research student in the field of structural engineering. I have also attached my research paper which is accepted in WCEE-17 to be conducted this year in Japan. I will also add my contribution to sympy in version.

 

Thanking you,

Harrsha Gudupudi

[harsha gudupudi]

Dear GSoc Mentors,

       I am resending you draft of my proposal for GSoC-2020  here. As i not sure whether you have received it. Please review it. I am even working on some issues. I am even a research student in the field of structural engineering. I have also attached my research paper which is accepted in WCEE-17 to be conducted this year in Japan. I will also add my contribution to sympy in version.

 

Thanking you,

Harrsha Gudupudi

[harsha gudupudi]

I request any mentor to take a look and suggest any possible improvements to my proposal . 

On Mon, 23 Mar, 2020, 7:03 PM harsha gudupudi, <harsh...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear GSoc Mentors,

       I am resending you draft of my proposal for GSoC-2020  here. As i not sure whether you have received it. Please review it. I am even working on some issues. I am even a research student in the field of structural engineering. I have also attached my research paper which is accepted in WCEE-17 to be conducted this year in Japan. I will also add my contribution to sympy in version.

 

Thanking you,

Harrsha Gudupudi

On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 9:52:45 AM UTC+5:30, harsha gudupudi wrote:

Dear GSoc Mentors,

       I am sending you a draft of my proposal for GSoC-2020  here. Please review it. I am even working on some issues. I am even a research student in the field of structural engineering. I have also attached my research paper which is accepted in WCEE-17 to be conducted this year in Japan. I will also add my contribution to sympy in version.

 

Thanking you,

Harrsha Gudupudi

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/e0d6d383-9ad2-49de-b9ae-e8b374ab1ec8%40googlegroups.com.

[Jason Moore]

Harsha,

You've got a lot of good ideas in your proposal. Here are some quick comments:

- The scope is way too large. You have too many different things. Bring the scope down to a couple of things.

- Some of the items are likely not appropriate for a symbolic library.

- I like that you have code showing sample API, but some will need some adjusting. For example, Beam() object should accept cross sectional geometry objects on initialization instead of the moment of inertia parameter. There has already been work on this.

Jason

moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CANxd512pBZR6A-6zKDa%3DP2YuX17syRKUYYgTbnTWJF7v_3tf8Q%40mail.gmail.com.

[harsha gudupudi]

Thank you, Sir, I'll get back to you with updated proposal and contributions.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAP7f1Aihhz-cxxF4%3DA-j5F2_G1OU_AYj5g-KHdgzGvUH-emqUw%40mail.gmail.com.