Stefano Babic
unread,3:42 AM (4 hours ago) 3:42 AMSign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Wes Malone, swup...@googlegroups.com, Braunwarth, Daniel, Franz Heger
Hi Wes,
On 8/3/26 23:46, Wes Malone wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Why should the Openssl CMS image signing revocation list only check
> leaf certificates? Current documentation states
>
>> Revocation is only checked against the signer certificate. Revoking an
>> intermediate CA in the trust chain would require the
>> X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL verification flag, which SWUpdate does not
>> currently set.
I am aware of this but I do not know which are the intentions of the
authors of the patch and which is their use case to explicitly allow
intermediate certificates. Added Daniel / Frank in CC, they can explain
the motivation.
>
> If I have an intermediate certificate that is revoked and included on my CRL:
> my_root
> -> intermediate_1 (revoked!)
> -> leaf_1 (revoked!)
> -> leaf_2 (newly created)
>
> why should swupdate allow leaf_2 to be valid?
>
> Maybe there is a reason I am missing that we shouldn't add CHECK_ALL?
>
> - if (!X509_STORE_set_flags(castore, X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK)) {
> + if (!X509_STORE_set_flags(castore, X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK |
> X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL)) {
>
> I can send this simple patch if you agree.
>
Yes - if Daniel / Frank have a use case to do in this way, we need then
a configuration to enable / disable the mechanism.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Nabla Software Engineering GmbH
Hirschstr. 111A | 86156 Augsburg | Tel:
+49 821 45592596
Geschäftsführer : Stefano Babic | HRB 40522 Augsburg
E-Mail:
sba...@nabladev.com