[meta-swupdate][PATCH] Improve explanation on machine suffix handling

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Andreas Naumann

unread,
Sep 14, 2026, 5:04:38 AMSep 14
to swup...@googlegroups.com, Andreas Naumann
Correct comment about SWUPDATE_IMAGES_NOAPPEND_MACHINE to it being a
variable flag, because setting it as variable only has no effect.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Naumann <d...@andin.de>
---
classes-recipe/swupdate.bbclass | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/classes-recipe/swupdate.bbclass b/classes-recipe/swupdate.bbclass
index 63e4ef9..c495263 100644
--- a/classes-recipe/swupdate.bbclass
+++ b/classes-recipe/swupdate.bbclass
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
# SWUPDATE_IMAGES = "core-image-full-cmdline"
# SWUPDATE_IMAGES_FSTYPES[core-image-full-cmdline] = ".ext4.gz"
# For this example either a file core-image-full-cmdline${IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX}.ext4.gz or a file
-# core-image-full-cmdline.ext4.gz gets added the swu archive. Optionally the variable
-# SWUPDATE_IMAGES_NOAPPEND_MACHINE allows to explicitly define if the IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX name
+# core-image-full-cmdline.ext4.gz gets added the swu archive. Optionally the variable flag
+# SWUPDATE_IMAGES_NOAPPEND_MACHINE[<image>] allows to explicitly define if the IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX name
# must be part of the image file name or not.
# * image file name(s)
# Example:
--
2.43.0

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages