swupdate

On 10/15/25 15:55, Stefano Cordibella wrote: > Thank you Stefano for the clarification (and the

Hi All, Am new to swupdate, can any one help me documents to get started and the respective documents

From: Clement Ramirez <clement...@actia.fr> The former implementation was updating a

Hi Clement, On 10/11/25 08:35, Clément Ramirez wrote: > Hi Stefano, > >> We do not know -

Hi Hamish, what I do not understand is: https://github.com/sbabic/swupdate/blob/master/corelib/

Hi Jean-Philippe, On 10/9/25 14:25, Jean-Philippe A wrote: > Hello, > > I am using swupdate

There is another issue: seems that the files tests/test_data/integration_output/output.swu.enc and

Hi h., On 10/8/25 19:08, h wulff wrote: > Hi! > > I struggle with the sw-description file:

Hi Ingo, On 10/2/25 12:27, ing...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Stefano, thanx for the quick reply. >

On Wed, Oct 1, 2025 at 11:53 AM Stefano Babic <stefan...@swupdate.org> wrote: > > Hi

Hi, >> It appears that the IPC from swupdate to swupdate-progress does not forward the "

Hi Michael, On 9/16/25 08:32, Michael Glembotzki wrote: > Changes v4 -> v5: > - Complete

I see, thanks for the clarification. I had understood that patches were submitted elsewhere, but I

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to sbabic/swupdate found with Coverity

Hi Dominiquw, On 9/24/25 08:00, Dominique Martinet wrote: > file modes with archive handlers are

On 9/19/25 08:42, Alexander Dahl wrote: > gcc warned about those: > > [ 25%] Building C

On 9/19/25 08:42, Alexander Dahl wrote: > gcc warns about this: > > [ 16%] Building C object

On 9/19/25 08:42, Alexander Dahl wrote: > gcc warned about this: > > [ 8%] Building C object

On 9/19/25 08:42, Alexander Dahl wrote: > gcc warned about this: > > [ 91%] Building C

Add support for dry-run mode to suricatta/wfx on a per job basis. To enable dry-run mode, the job

Hi Massimo, n 9/19/25 11:33, Massimo Tosa wrote: > Hi everybody, > > FYI: as expected the

This reverts commit af6f21260b85c0c3c5c779d04d0ca5c6bc169c42. After discussion on ML, this feature

On Thu, 2025-09-18 at 09:46 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Ernestas, > > On 9/18/25 09:28,

The problem was that I used return 0 to indicate success instead of return true Torstein tor. 11. sep

On 04.09.25 13:49, Michael Glembotzki wrote: > .. if CONFIG_ASYM_ENCRYPTED_SW_DESCRIPTION is

On 08.09.25 09:31, Michael Glembotzki wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Glembotzki <Michael.

On 28.08.25 05:41, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Prior to commit d275fec4bb2d ("tree-wide: refactor

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:21:30AM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund (Nokia) wrote: > On Sun, 2025-08-31 at

On 8/31/25 21:07, steffen.kothe via swupdate wrote: > From: Steffen Kothe <steffen.kothe@skothe

From: Steffen Kothe <steffe...@skothe.net> Hi together, I recently found an issue where