Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

who Vincent's probable hold drains, Rasheed let_'ses other than victorian, solar clubs

1 view
Skip to first unread message

m...@privacy.net

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 1:25:30 AM1/11/08
to
is judge,
and he is an interested party. There should be a third, who is
disinterested.

297. Veri juris.[44] --We have it no more; if we had it, we should take
conformity to the customs of a country as the rule of justice. It is here
that, not finding justice, we have found force, etc.

298. Justice, might.--It is right that what is just should be obeyed; it is
necessary that what is strongest should be obeyed. Justice without might is
helpless; might without justice is tyrannical. Justice without might is
gainsaid, because there are always offenders; might without justice is
condemned. We must then combine justice and might and, for this end, make
what is just strong, or what is strong just.

Justice is subject to dispute; might is easily recognised and is not
disputed. So we cannot give might to justice, because might has gainsaid
justice and has declared that it is she herself who is just. And thus, being
unable to make what is just strong, we have made what is strong just.

299. The only universal rules are the laws of the country in ordinary
affairs and of the majority in others. Whence comes this? From the might
which is in them. Hence it comes that kings, who have power of a different
kind, do not follow the majority of their ministers.

No doubt equality of goods is just; but, being unable to cause might to obey
justice, men have made it just to obey might. Unable to strengthen justice,
they have justified might; so that the just and the strong should unite, and
there should be peace, which is the sovereign good.

300. "When a strong man armed keepeth his goods, his goods are in peace."

301. Why do we follow the majority? Is it because they have more reason? No,
because they have more power.

Why do we follow the ancient laws and opinions? Is it because they are more
sound? No, but because they are unique and remove from us the root of
difference.

302. ... It is the effect of might, not of custom. For those who are capable
of o


0 new messages