Surface Flow Overestimation with CN vs. Low Precipitation with Green–Ampt in SWAT

47 views
Skip to first unread message

Saba Shaghaghi

unread,
Oct 9, 2025, 8:24:52 AMOct 9
to SWAT+

Hello,

When I use the CN method, I get an overestimation of surface flow. However, when I switch to the Green–Ampt method, the precipitation shown in the SWAT “Hydrology” section appears to be too low, which causes the surface flow to be nearly zero.

For the Green–Ampt method, I converted my weather data to hourly format, but after running the model, I still notice that the precipitation is reported as very low. Additionally, in my textinout folder there is no output.sub file, and the pcp.cli file only lists station names without including the subbasins. 

Thanks for your assistance,

Best regards,

Saba

Saba Shaghaghi

unread,
Oct 15, 2025, 9:37:26 AMOct 15
to SWAT+

Hello everyone,

I’m following up on my previous question. Could someone please help me understand where I can find which subbasins are receiving specific amounts of precipitation from my dataset?

When I use the CN method, I get an overestimation of surface flow. However, when I switch to the Green–Ampt method, the precipitation shown in the SWAT “Hydrology” section appears to be too low, which causes the surface flow to be nearly zero. For the Green–Ampt method, I converted my weather data to hourly format, but after running the model, I still notice that the precipitation is reported as very low. 

Additionally, in my textinout folder there is no output.sub file, and the pcp.cli file only lists station names without including the subbasins. 

Thank you for your time and assistance.

Best regards,
Saba

Natalja C.

unread,
Oct 15, 2025, 12:54:07 PMOct 15
to SWAT+
Hello,
Did you adjust the simulation output to use hourly data and print hourly results?
Run SWAT+: Confirm Simulation Settings: Set Your Simulation Period: Advanced Options: Time step...: choose hourly

Best,
Natalja

Saba Shaghaghi

unread,
Oct 16, 2025, 11:28:17 PMOct 16
to SWAT+

Hello Natalja,

Thank you for your response. Yes, both I changed my weather data to  hourly-based format and also updated the time step to hourly in the advanced options before running the model. However, in the SWAT check, I noticed that the precipitation value is very low (46), and the simulated outlet flow discharge is also near zero.

In contrast, when I switch the method to the CN approach, the precipitation value becomes reasonable (1288), but the model produces a large overestimation of flow and runoff compared to my observed data. I have attached both result files for your reference.

Additionally, I would like to check how much precipitation each of my subbasins receives from my weather data. In my pcp.cli file, only the station names are listed, and the subbasins are not included, as shown in the attached file.

Best regards,
Saba

using hourly data and green amp.jpg
with only usgs weather data.jpg
Screenshot 2025-10-15 132014.jpg

Saba Shaghaghi

unread,
Oct 28, 2025, 10:03:40 AM (10 days ago) Oct 28
to SWAT+

Hi Natalja,
I wanted to follow up on my earlier questions. I’d really appreciate it if you could let me know how to fix this problem and what I need to do.
Thank you so much!

Best,
Saba

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages