AWE parameter

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Judith Eeckman

unread,
Oct 20, 2025, 11:54:06 AM (11 days ago) Oct 20
to SWAT+
Dear all,
I am calibration SWAT+ on a 17km^2 bassin.
I am still unsatisfied with the simulated discharge regarding the observations.
It looks like lateral transfers are too fast in the soils, little water is store and dicharge reacts quickly to rain.
I may come from the AWE and K values I give as input, but, after checking, I think they are physically consistant.
But, in swat+ editor, when I run 'Ouput check', in 'Land Use summary', I see that the AWE has no value in the table (see image attached).
I am wondering if the model actually reads the AWC value correctly.

Best,

Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG
Capture2.PNG
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages