Simulated Flows ≈30× Lower Than Observed at Outlet

14 views
Skip to first unread message

atlas probest

unread,
Nov 11, 2025, 10:48:01 AMNov 11
to SWAT+

Dear SWAT Team,

I’m reaching out for help with a persistent magnitude problem in my SWAT+ project (Bartın–Arit basin, Turkey). Despite many careful checks, my simulated monthly discharge at the gauged outlet is ≈30 times lower than observations, and I have not been able to identify the root cause.

What I see

  • Observed monthly flows (DSİ gauge at the basin outlet) are in the multi-m³/s range, but simulated “Channel 37 – Monthly River Flow” remains mostly 0.01–0.7 m³/s (median ~0.02 m³/s).

  • Basin water-balance outputs (basin_wb_mon.txt) frequently show tens of mm/month of water yield (surq_cha/latq_cha present), yet routed outlet flows remain very small.

  • Channel bookkeeping indicates large flo_in relative to flo_out for the outlet link in several months.

  • Changing PET method (Penman–Monteith ↔ Hargreaves) and warm-up (2 → 5 years) does not affect the magnitude gap.

What I’ve tried (brief)

  • Rebuilt the project with consistent CRS and clean delineation; outlet matches the DSİ gauge location and drainage area.

  • HRUs created with realistic thresholds; climate (MGM daily PCP/TMP) loaded and assigned; first baseline run produced consistent basin precip and ET.

  • Multiple parameter passes (CN2/Ksat/SURLAG/latq_co/ALPHA_BF/RCHRG_DP/GWQMN/REVAP*; channel K) tested in SWAT+ Toolbox Manual/Automatic; NSE remains ~–0.9 and the hydrograph stays far below the observed series.

  • Verified date/units and conversions (m³/s ↔ mm/month) outside SWAT using the correct basin area.

Where I’m stuck

  • The magnitude deficit persists across scenarios and runs. Basin files suggest sufficient water is generated, but the outlet series remains an order of magnitude low, and I cannot tell whether the loss is due to routing/transmission in channels, deep leakage settings, or a wiring mismatch (object/scenario).

I would greatly appreciate your guidance on a systematic way to diagnose this kind of “flows >> into channels but << out at the outlet” situation in SWAT+. If there are specific reach/groundwater diagnostics, channel loss flags, or known pitfalls between land-to-reach routing and outlet flow that I should check, I’d be grateful for your pointers.

Thank you very much for your time and support.

Kind regards,
HAMED MARDAN

SWAT+ Project: Bartın–Arit (Turkey)
Email: hamedmardan91@gmailcom

atlas probest

unread,
Nov 11, 2025, 10:48:08 AMNov 11
to SWAT+
Screenshot 2025-10-31 002105.png

Osman Furkan TOKGÖZ

unread,
Dec 8, 2025, 8:30:26 AMDec 8
to SWAT+
Are you sure that "Channel 37" is the main outlet channel? It may be not the main channel which has gauge station on it.
11 Kasım 2025 Salı tarihinde saat 18:48:08 UTC+3 itibarıyla atlas probest şunları yazdı:

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages