Dear,
You have years of 2003-2011.
Allocate 2 years for warm-up: 2003 to 2004.
For calibration period: 2005 to 2010, a total of 6 years
For validation period: 2011 to 2013, a total of 3 years
For this scheme, do the followings:
1. FILE.CIO (run up to calibration period)
11 | NBYR : Number of years simulated
2003 | IYR : Beginning year of simulation
............
.............
2 | NYSKIP: number of years to skip output printing/summarization
1 | IPRINT: print code (month, day, year)
2. sufi2_extract_rch
output.rch : swat output file name
1 : number of variables to get
7 : variable column number(s) in the swat output file (as many as the above number)
29 : total number of reaches (subbasins) in the project
1 : number of reaches (subbasins) to get for the first variable
29 (check this) : reach (subbasin) numbers for the first variable (is this true? you have the observation at reach_out_29?, which for me looks like the most-upstream subbasin)
2005 : beginning year of simulation not including the warm up period
2010 : end year of simulation
1 : time step (1=daily, 2=monthly, 3=yearly)
3.Observed_rch.txt
1 : number of observed variables
FLOW_OUT_29 : this is the name of the variable and the subbasin number to be included in the objective function
2191 (check this, do you have total of 2191 observations?, if missing then delete it, but keep the sequence) : number of data points for this variable as it follows below. First column is a sequential number from beginning
: of the simulation, second column is variable name and date (format arbitrary), third column is variable value.
1 FLOW_OUT_1_2005 57.455
2 FLOW_OUT_2_2005 75
3 FLOW_OUT_3_2005 61.123
......
......
2191 FLOW_OUT_2191_2010 17.297 (in here, better to rename it FLOW_OUT_365_2010. It does not matter but this looks more natural, the flow of 365th day of 2010)
4.observed.txt
- It looks OK, if you have correct data at #3.
5. At other files (e.g: var_file_rch.txt; var_file_name.txt), keep specifying, FLOW_OUT_29.txt (if 29 is correct flow out at which you have observation), I think this is a wrong reach out number)
Regards,
narayan