Rick R
unread,Oct 24, 2009, 2:17:25 PM10/24/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to swarm-...@googlegroups.com
I was able to get the (evident) bugs worked out of my Remote Actors implementation of Swarm. Remote actors simply encapsulate the threading, serialization, discovery and messaging that was present in Ian's implementation. As such, it is a simplification of Ian's implementation, the design and structure is the same, as is the interface. It has a side effect of being more efficient since it isn't creating a new socket for every request.
With regards to the sample pure functional application. I got halfway through it before needing to incorporate monads to handle some failure cases. It was at that point that I decided that it was far too complicated to require that of the average (non-haskell) programmer. Though if an expert coder wishes to optimize his system, it is still an option.
"The greatest obstacle to discovering the shape of the earth, the continents, and the oceans was not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge."
- Daniel J. Boorstin