I am ever recalling those swift, bright days in
that never-to-be forgotten winter, lived in simple freedom and
kindliness. We could not choose but to be happy and good. And now
while I share with all who knew and loved him a deep sense of
loss, it would be an impertinence to measure your sorrow and loss
by my own, so closely have you been associated with him in his
intimate friendship with your family. I knew him personally but a
short time, yet in that time I could but see in a hundred ways the
child side of Swamiji's character, which was a constant appeal to
the Mother quality in all good women. He depended upon those near
him in a way which brought him very nearly one's heart. I think
the Mead sisters must have remarked this side of Swamiji.
Possessing as he did an almost inexhaustible knowledge of things
old as the world — a sage and philosopher — he yet appeared to
me to lack utterly the commercial knowledge which so
distinguish[es] men of the Western world. You were constantly
rendering him some apparently trifling service in the everyday
homely happenings of our daily life, he in some small way
requiring to be set right. That which we mother and care for in
little, seemingly inconsequent ways must through the very nature
of our care weave a world of tenderness around the object of our
love — until in some sad day we are robbed of the divine
privilege of loving service and are left like "Rachel mourning
for her children because they are not", Thus I know, aside from
the loss of a delightful and rare companion, the fact alone of
your generous service brought him very near to you. One day busy
with my work, Swamiji absorbed with his curries and chapattis, I
spoke to him of you, when he said: "Ah, yes! Jo is the sweetest
spirit of us all" — He would come home from a lecture where he
was compelled to break away from his audience, so eagerly would
they gather around him — come rushing into the kitchen like a
boy released from school, with, "Now we will cook". The prophet
and sage would disappear, to reveal the child side or simplicity
of character. Presently 'Jo' would appear and discover the
culprit among pots and pans in his fine dress, who was by
thrifty, watchful Jo admonished to change to his home garments.
Ah, those pleasant 'Tea Party' days, as you termed them. How we
used to laugh. Do you remember the lime he was showing me how he
wound his turban about his head and you were begging him to
hasten as he was already due at the lecture room. I said,
"Swami, don't hurry. You are like a man on his way to be hung.
The crowd was jostling each other to reach the place of
execution, when he called out. 'Don't hurry. There will be
nothing interesting until I get there'. I assure you, Swami,
there will be nothing interesting until you get there." This so
pleased him that often afterwards he would say, "There will be
nothing interesting 'til I gel there", and laugh like a boy.
Just now I recall a morning quite an audience had gathered at
our house to listen to the learned Hindu, who sat with downcast
eyes and impenetrable face while his audience waited. His
meditations over, he raised his eyes to Mrs. Leggett's face and
asked, like a simple child. "What shall I say?" This gifted man,
possessing the subtle power of delighting an intellectual
audience, to ask for a theme! There appeared to me in this
question an exquisite touch of confidence in her judgement in
suggesting a subject suitable to the occasion. A most
interesting portion of the day you lost.
In the early morning when you and your sister would be sleeping,
he would come in for his morning plunge in the bath. Soon his
deep, rich voice would be heard in the something resembling a
solemn chant. Though Sanskrit [was] an unknown tongue to me, I
yet caught the spirit of it all, and these early morning
devotions are among my sweetest recollections of the great
Hindu. In the homely old-fashioned kitchen you and I have seen
Swamiji at his best. He could let his thoughts have untrammelled
(s)way.
(From a letter dated September 2, 1902, to
Josephine MacLeod)
Todays-Special
16-June
in Swami Vivekananda Life
1900 : [Sister Nivedita's notes
of a New York Bhagavad-Gitâ class, recorded in a June 16,
1900 letter to Miss Josephine MacLeod]
This morning the lesson on the Gitâ was grand. It began with
a long talk on the fact that the highest ideals are not for
all. Non-resistance is not for the man who thinks the
replacing of the maggot in the wound by the leprous saint
with "Eat, Brother!" disgusting and horrible. Non-resistance
is practised by a mother's love towards an angry child. It
is a travesty in the mouth of a coward, or in the face of a
lion.
Let us be true. Nine-tenths of our life's energy is spent in
trying to make people think us that which we are not. That
energy would be more rightly spent in becoming that which we
would like to be. And so it went — beginning with the
salutation to an incarnation:
Salutation to thee — the Guru of the universe,
Whose footstool is worshipped by the gods.
Thou one unbroken Soul,
Physician of the world's diseases.
Guru of even the gods,
To thee our salutation.
Thee we salute. Thee we salute. Thee we salute.
In the Indian tones — by Swami himself.
There was an implication throughout the talk that Christ and
Buddha were inferior to Krishna — in the grasp of problems —
inasmuch as they preached the highest ethics as a world
path, whereas Krishna saw the right of the whole, in all its
parts — to its own differing ideals.
Truth
Truth
can be stated in a thousand different ways, yet
each one can be True. -- Swami Vivekananda