Bruce,
On Aug 21, 11:08 pm, bjskelly <
bruce.ske...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I was not using -password option when I was
> successful in the command line SVN update to the repository. The password
> I'm giving it is the userid/password I normally use for source forge. I
> don't think that this is an SSH key as at the time I succeeded, I had
> generated no passwords using ssh-keygen.
But if you use the svn `--password=…` option then it is unlikely that
svn will ask for your password.
Thus, if you are then asked for a password it is most likely that SSH
is asking for it.
SSH "is a program for logging into a remote machine" - which requires
a user-name & password for the remote machine.
You are getting confused between passwords & SSH keys.
> It was my understanding, that using ssh-agent and ssh-add was for the us of
> ssh private/public id files created by ssh-keygen. Since I was successful
> on the command line with out using ssh-keygen, then I don't think that this
> applies.
SSH keys obviate the need for password (prompts).
I know you are not using an SSH key at the moment.
You need to use one if you want to use svnX.
SvnX may run many Subversion commands on many working copies &
repositories.
It would not be good if it kept prompting users for passwords.
> P.S. Allura is the new interface for SourceForge.net, and I guess we are
> part of the beta. I guess eventually all projects will be converted over
> to Allura. The don't want us to use https because it has been causing
> corruption in the repositories. Plain svn: works for checkouts, but you
> then can't commit the code.
My understanding is that the problem with HTTPS is an Allura problem
that they intend to fix.
I’m not sure where they are up to in this process or if they have
already fixed it.
[The information appears difficult to find - which is slightly
ironic.]
Chris