Hotdog Cloud Game Old Version
Hadda Condino
Yesterday, I purchased Acrobat Standard, mistakenly thinking that it had the bates numbering function. Today I realize only "Pro" has that function. I am very well aware that I can just pay full price for the Pro version. My question is whether I can "upgrade" to Pro. In other words, if the price for Pro is a little bit more than the price for Standard, can I just pay that difference to get the Pro version?
I've searched this question for a while now, and the only response to this question about "upgrading" are comments providing links to the pricing page. Respectfully, that is not an answer to the question.
By analogy, let's say I purchase a hotdog and forget to ask for catchup. I realize my mistake and I turn back to the counter to ask if I can get catchup. The worker says, "Yes, you can now purchase a second hotdog, this time with catchup on it." I don't want two hot dogs: one without catchup and a second with. I just want one hotdog but I want to add catchup to it. Right? I'd prefer, all things being equal, not to have wasted the money I spent on the Standard Acrobat.
If the answer is "No, you must now face the consequences of your dumb decision," okay, I get it. But please tell me that clearly. Don't pretend that purchasing from scratch is the same thing as a simple "upgrade".
In other words, I am not looking to walk away from this transaction with both Acrobat Standard AND also Acrobat Pro. No. That's not it. Please, can I get a non-nonsequitur answer to the questions, "Can I *upgrade* from Standard to Pro?"
[Also, by "non-nonsequitur" I am referring to an answer that is not a nonsequitur. I've been getting nonsequitur answers in the sense that I've been asking, "Can I upgrade?" and I keep getting the response, "Yes, you can purchase from scratch." I already know that I can purchase from scratch. I want to know if I can *upgrade* my one time purchase.]
"We recommend that customers who run Java applications in containers, and use either the hotpatch or Hotdog, update to the latest versions of the software immediately," the cloud giant said in a security bulletin on Tuesday.
In December, shortly after security researchers sounded the alarm on the now-infamous remote-code execution flaw in Apache's incredibly widely used logging library, Amazon released emergency hot-fixes to close the Log4j RCE in vulnerable JVMs across multiple environments: standalone virtual servers, Kubernetes clusters, Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) instances, and AWS Fargate serverless situations.
However, the hot-fixes inadvertently introduced new weaknesses. These new bugs, if exploited, could allow a miscreant to escape a container and take over the underlying host server as the root user, according to Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 threat research team, which discovered the flaws. Exploitation could thus lead to the hijacking of other containers and customer applications on the host.
AWS this week issued new versions of the hotpatch for Amazon Linux and Amazon Linux 2. Customers using the hotpatch for Apache Log4j on Amazon Linux can update to the new version by running the following command: sudo yum update.
For example, the 'java' binary was invoked in the container namespaces via the nsenter command (excluding the user namespace). But aside from that, it was spawned with all Linux capabilities, and without the isolation technologies that normally confine containers, such as seccomp and cgroups. It also ran as the root user regardless of the container's user.
Unit 42 created a proof-of-concept video that shows a supply-chain attack via a malicious container image that exploits the earlier patch. Similarly, existing compromised containers can exploit the vuln to escape and take over their underlying host. But the security team "decided not to share the exploit's implementation details at this time to prevent malicious parties from weaponizing it."
93ddb68554