--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to Surrou...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSoun...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
On 9/6/11, Joe A <joe.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To extract DSD files from an SACD, use scarletbook.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to Surrou...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSoun...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
can somebody please help me? I need Philips ProTECH DST Encoder 4.0.3 and I can't find it anywhere ?
thank you.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to Surrou...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSoun...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to surroundsoun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Just curious, what does 'DST' stand for here?
On 02/22/13 01:39, shemes...@gmail.com wrote:
can somebody please help me? I need Philips ProTECH DST Encoder 4.0.3 and I can't find it anywhere ?
thank you.
On Monday, September 5, 2011 4:00:34 PM UTC+3, gfv wrote:
--
Never mind, found it on the web
.DST = Direct Stream Transfer
alternately, an embroidery file ;>
"It" is the meaning of the initials 'dst'. Nothing more.
Remux the mono
channels you already saved , together in new audio formats : dolby digital_ac3 /dvd,dts (cpt)/dvd , dts ES
Discrete/Matrix ,DtsHd Master audio,High Res ,mlp etc...From my long
experience working /testing Audio for many times and a lot of albums already
finished , i reccomend you Remuxing your songs in
Ac3,Dts EsMatrix and Dts HdMA all together for all the songs , recording
the songs on a Dvd R disc playable on a BluRay player
and the most Hd Media players(ISO
disc)...
So you will have BluRay audio(and video if you want!) burning your albums/music
on a Simple DvdR...
__To remux DDigital 5.1 i recc. Minnetonka
Surcode for DDig., Sonic Foundry or Wav to Ac3
Encoder...to remux simple dts(48khz)/dvd - Surcode
for dtsDvd...to remux DtsEs,DtsHdMa, Dts High Res.5.1 to 7.1 etc - DTS Master Audio Suite 2.60...to remux MLP (for
DvdAudio) __ use Min.Surcode for Mlp...
__And now...using Audio Muxer soft put first your ac3 songs all at a time (same
bit res.and sample rate !!!)>>>select for each one a foto(google/name
of pop group/pictures...better a good resolution___Add also a Thumbnail)___and
mux all (you can also one by one...) ?to a mkv file(picture res.to hd -720p...btw)
__After muxig the song/s you will have an audio/video mkv
file with d.dig. 6ch. sound...
Repeat the operation (remux) all your songs (leave this time default background
on Audio Muxer0...
You will have , depending on how many format sounds you want to have on your
disc (Dolby Digital_ac3 is anyway Mandatory__to
make the disc playable on BluRay Players...) at the end 2 or 3 mkv files (with
ac3 ,dts es and dtsHd etc....).
__Now , using tsmuxer soft , drag and
drop your mkv s in to the window of the app._select BluRay(for BD discs) and
AVCHD (for Dvds)_the audio quality will be the same... (you will have already
chapters)...Important : you must to untick the h264
parts of the second and third mkvs_keep only
the h264 video of the mkv file with foto backgrounds... Start
muxing !!!
___You will have now two folders : BDMV and
CERTIFICATE _ a nice BluRay structure
disc ready to be burned ( i use imgburn / udf 2.5 and
always Dvds...I play them on a Samsung BD player or an eGreat hd
media player...
I use also the method to convert all my prefered (stero albums or songs ) to 5.1 or 7.1 hd surr.sound ...(sometimes i combine
audio with some video(bonus ,can be 3d also...)
Results are great ( i use Adobe Audition or WavLab to create 6 or 8 monos
from a normal stereo song...
Sound is magnificent !!! (If you work hard on the mono personalised chanels
_results are (can be), better then originaly studio surround discs !)...
It is another methot to obtain a BDAudio disc (on a normal DvdR...) with veri nice authoring motion menus and playlists (BRay and
Avchd format discs...) !
Thanks and Good Luck my friends !
One reason could be so you can create your own DVD-A.
Personally I find the discs play better on my universal player than burned SACD-R from ISO.
I only have a cheap player though which may be the reason.
Additionally it means I can read the DVD-A on my PC, which I cannot do on burned SACD-R (even though it was once a DVD-R).
Also you are limited by the size of the DVD-R rather than the existing SACD-R ISO using this method.
Many SACD albums are very short, an example being Love Over Gold which is just under 41 minutes.
Authoring a DVD-A allows you to decide the content to go onto the DVD.
An example being a Beatles 24/44 album compilation in DVD-A format which I have a copy of.
I have previously used Foobar and Saracon to convert from SACD format to PCM and have not found any severe sound degradation arising from the conversion.
Purists may baulk at my departure from DSD but I am quite satisfied with this process on the couple of occasions I have converted to PCM/DVD-A.
From: surrou...@googlegroups.com [mailto:surrou...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of August Bleed
Sent: 04 March 2013 7:25 PM
To: surrou...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [SurroundSound] Re: Re-authoring a SACD
Oh didn't want to mean that in a demeaning way if it came across like that. I was just curious as to why one would do that when most of the same stuff is available in some form of PCM that was converted by professional engineers. It would seem if that possibility exists that would be the superior way to go sound quality wise.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:00 AM, August Bleed <blee...@gmail.com> wrote: