[FULL AVS Video Editor 7.1.2.262 Patch (menin)
Laurice Whack
Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent.
I have been trying to start a basic mission using the Navada map by creating 4 / 5 basic waypoints. I place my aircraft on the runway as "takeoff" and when I add my first waypoint, the location where the aircraft is taking off is automatically designated as SP. What does "SP" mean? Does it stand for "Starting Point"? In many tutorials I have watched, there is no "SP", but a "0" as the starting point. Also, the last point always comes up as DP > Destination Point? (I am just guessing here). And if "DP" = Destination Point, the editor won't allow me to qualify it as a "landing" point, so I am not sure I am closing the loop on a complete linear mission.
Finally, is there a tutorial, or some kind of text that explains how to input the conditions mentioned in the CDS Manual for a more immersive experience? I am not familiar with the script language, not sure how to enjoy that part of the editor without any clear guidance.
I'm pretty sure you got it right: Starting Point and Destination Point. A little further down you would select what type of waypoint it is. See image for detail. This is where you would make it a landing point. See DCS User Manual 2020 page 192.
We all have our own levels of editing focus. This weekend I was at a monthly Pacific Northwest Writers meeting, and the fellow beside me said he never wakes up in the middle of the night to fix a sentence. Lucky for him. He sleeps through the night.
Perhaps the greatest reward of self-editing, though, is gaining more control over your own work. When you can spot and correct most of the issues yourself before handing over your manuscript, you retain more autonomy over the final product. As an author, improving your manuscript through self-editing helps establish trust with your editor that you understand the common pitfalls writers fall into and are ready to think critically about your own work.
Self-editing brings numerous benefits that can pay dividends when your work is ready for publication. The initial investment of time and effort in editing your own manuscript allows for a smoother process and helps cultivate valuable writerly skills for future projects.
Before bringing on an editor to polish your novel or nonfiction manuscript, you can save time and money by reviewing the draft to catch and correct many simple errors that tend to slip through on first drafts.
The following outline provides a systematic approach for you to self-edit your manuscript, focusing on improving clarity, conciseness, and consistency before an editor can offer higher-level editorial guidance.
By making these types of targeted changes, you can transform flat, dull prose into writing that comes alive on the page. Start with a search for -ly words, weak pronouns, and filler phrases, then brainstorm stronger verbs, nouns, and specific details to replace the vague terminology in your draft.
Editing your writing can be daunting, but remembering that your manuscript deserves your careful attention and best efforts can help motivate you through the process. Before an editor sees your work, you owe it to yourself to:
It was from Suzanne, one of Polo's four children. She lives in California and bumped online into a column I wrote back in 2007 about a hazing scandal involving Fairhaven High School football players who had tormented a younger teammate at a summer football camp out on the Cape. The column mentioned her father, the young coach I played football and baseball for way back in the late 1960s at Chaminade High School in New York.
The news came while I was digesting the latest on the scandal involving a former football coach at Penn State University, Jerry Sandusky, accused of sexually abusing young boys who had been under his care through a charitable foundation he founded for children.
I was at Sandusky's big farewell bash the weekend he retired from coaching and just two days before I would start as editor of the State College newspaper. An acquaintance at the party introduced me to Penn State head coach Joe Paterno as the new editor in town and someone who had played football at Yale University in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
"You played for Carm Cozza?" he said, referring to Yale's now retired head football coach, who had coached NFL greats Brian Dowling, Calvin Hill, Gary Fencik, and my teammate and current NFL coach Dick Jauron, among others.
Paterno's life was bounded by family, football and Penn State University, and I have wondered if those narrow confines kept him from recognizing the terrible things that were happening close to him for many years.
Those confines had certainly blinded a lot of other people. Just weeks ago, some of Penn State's former football players were trying to mount an effort to oust members of the university's board of trustees who had voted to fire Paterno over the Sandusky scandal. And they were threatening a mutiny against Paterno's successor, Billy O'Brien, the current offensive coordinator for our own New England Patriots.
Although his failure to do more to prevent years of child sexual abuse will forever be part of Paterno's legacy, history will judge him as something more than merely the winningest football coach in Division I history, if something less than the demigod a lot of people in Happy Valley wanted to believe him to be.
But then, he also believed that people could pick themselves up, again and again. No matter how many times you were knocked down, you could always get back up on your feet. He didn't tell you those things. He made sure you learned them for yourself in the dust and sweat of the practice field or on the metal bench where you sat for a few games when you got a little too full of yourself and needed to be taken down a notch or two.
My family would move away while I was in college, and I never saw Bob Polo again; and yet in a hundred moments in my life, particularly when I have failed to be as good or strong a person as I should have been, I have heard him telling me to get back up and do it right the next time.
Bob Unger is editor and associate publisher of SouthCoast Media Group, publisher of The Standard-Times and SouthCoastToday.com. He can be reached by email at run...@s-t.com or by phone at 508-979-4430.
I'm currently dealing with a high reputation editor that completely changes the meaning of the question with the editing of the title (and body), so that only his answer is correct, and all the other answers (including the most upvoted and accepted one), does not make any sense or are incorrect (they cannot be correct, because editor completely changed the meaning of the question).
I've reverted the change to the title, it went through the moderation process and was approved by several other reviewers. Only for the editor in question instantly reverting it back to his edit with one click.
I'm completely lost how to proceed here. I don't want to be rude, but this person acts like he's a mind reader who knows better what was the intent of the original question better than the person asking and the person (not me) who provided the accepted answer.
As far as edit disagreements go, this one stayed pretty tame - so I don't think there's further action to take, but I'd urge folks to ensure that subsequent edits leave room for all answers. As old questions get older, it's a good thing to see folks revisit them and provide new information - but at the same time once something gets rolled back more than a few times it's generally time to go hands off and just involve a mod.
If you feel that this person is repeatedly defacing your question, just flag it explaining the problem (you can link to this question BTW) so a moderator can look at the edit history for the question and, high rep or not, he/she will take appropriate action amongst:
Featuring nine new articles chosen by coeditor Steven M. Cahn, the third edition of E. D. Klemke's The Meaning of Life offers twenty-two insightful selections that explore this fascinating topic. The essays are primarily by philosophers but also include materials from literary figures and religious thinkers. As in previous editions, the readings are organized around three themes. In Part I the articles defend the view that without faith in God, life has no meaning or purpose. In Part II the selections oppose this claim, defending instead a nontheistic, humanistic alternative--that life can have meaning even in the absence of theistic commitment. In Part III the contributors ask whether the question of the meaning of life is itself meaningful. The third edition adds substantial essays by Moritz Schlick, Joel Feinberg, and John Kekes as well as selections from the writings of Louis P. Pojman, Emil L. Fackenheim, Robert Nozick, Susan Wolf, and Steven M. Cahn. The only anthology of its kind, The Meaning of Life: A Reader, Third Edition, is ideal for courses in introduction to philosophy, human nature, and the meaning of life. It also offers general readers an accessible and stimulating introduction to the subject.
A pcb is a 3-dimensional object with different materials stacked on top of each other.
If a designer talks about designing a 2 layer board then they typically mean that this board has two copper layers. A 4 layer board has 4 copper layers and so on. In addition to these copper layers there are other technical and documentation layers available.
A good introductory read is this post by @dchisholm : Any way to make the screen more understandable?
The use of the edge cut layer in footprints can result in problems. As there is no snapping for the drawing tool other then to the grid this might result in polygons that are not closed.
This layer is unsupported by the footprint editor (KiCad 5 and earlier). There is no way to define drawings on that layer from within it. KiCad 4 even moved drawings on that layer to another layer when opening it in the footprint editor. This non feature has luckily been removed from version 5. More details about edge cut support see this wishlist bug