I think there are probably superpermutations for n=7 that are shorter than 5907. If I am right, that implies there are, in general, superpermutations shorter than
symbols, contradicting our working conjecture.
We’ve been looking at superpermutations consisting of a kernel of some number of 3-cycles, with the rest of the 2-cycles attached as a tree. But there is no reason to restrict ourselves to kernels of this form, and:
- There are superpermutations that use other kernels, for n=6;
- There are many potential kernels for n=7 that, if they can be completed to superpermutations, would yield superpermutations shorter than 5907.
I‘ve been looking at kernels that consist of complete 1-cycles – i.e. whenever they enter a 1-cycle, they traverse the whole 1-cycle before leaving – and that never enter a 2-cycle that has been entered before.
As a convenient notation for kernels, let’s write a sequence of numbers showing how many 1-cycles are followed before leaving the 2-cycle. I’ll also write a space to indicate where a (standard) weight-4 edge is used.
The three kernels we have considered for n=6 so far are denoted:
5555
5555 5555
5555 5555 5555
It’s easy to count how many 1-cycles a kernel covers: just add up the digits.
To work out whether it’s possible arithmetically to complete the kernel to a superpermutation, and if so how long the superpermutation will be, we need another measure that I call the score of the kernel, which I’ll explain now.
Our baseline is that each 2-cycle should cover (n-2) 1-cycles, and the score measures the efficiency of the kernel relative to that benchmark. So each digit d contributes (d - (n-2)) to the score. A space represents a unit of slack, and a unit of slack is as bad as a whole 2-cycle, so a space contributes -(n-2).
For example, all the n=6 kernels listed above have a score of 4.
If the score is a multiple of (n-2), then it is arithmetically possible to complete the kernel to a superpermutation. If the score is k(n-2) then the resulting superpermutation has length:
n! + (n-1)! + (n-2)! + (n-3)! + (n-3) - k
For n=6 there are many kernels (of the form I’ve been considering) with score 4, and two that have a score of 8:
-
5553553555 5553553555
5553553552552553553555
I have checked that neither of these can be completed to a superpermutation, so it’s not unreasonable to think that 872 is minimal for n=6. But for larger n, there are many many possible kernels that would give rise to shorter superpermutations than we’ve been considering so far, and – unless there’s some obstruction we haven’t thought about – it seems likely that some of them will be completable.
Here are a couple of kernels for n=7 that have score 15 – so if they could be completed, they would give rise to superpermutations of length 5905: