Hi Ben
I just posted my questions on
http://post.gmane.org
I'm not sure if it is posted on the mailing list yet. Anyway, I also decide to send it directly to you guys.
If this is not the right way to approach, please pardon me and let me know. Here is my comments that I posted on
http://post.gmane.org
The Linux VM test machine showed it is the OOM error.
Below is the error when I run the command dmesg
Out of memory: Kill process 4353 (httpd) score 134 or sacrifice child
Killed process 4353, UID 41000, (httpd) total-vm:2850244kB, anon-rss:690052kB, file-rss:28kB
This Linux VM machine has Apache/2.2.25 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.25 OpenSSL/0.9.8y DAV/2 SVN/1.8.5 configured.
From this error message, the httpd process was killed which seem to me it either has something to do with the Apache server or SVN 1.8 itself ??
We download this release of subversion from Collabnet. It bundles subversion and apache together so we don't modify the apache configuration to have the correc modules.
Have anyone ran into this OOM issue with subversion 1.8 and Apache 2.2.25 configuration?
Could you please help to shed some light on this? Let me know if you need any additional information.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Reser [mailto:
b...@reser.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 3:37 PM
To: Nguyen, Quyen;
us...@subversion.apache.org
Cc: Vornbrock, Beth
Subject: Re: Bug report on SVN 1.8.3 Cannot allocate Memory
On 12/12/13 2:12 PM, Nguyen, Quyen wrote:
> Looking into the subversion error_log and it appears it point to the
> memory
>
> [Mon Nov 18 17:28:53 2013] [error] [client 10.20.36.51] Can't start
> process
> '/data00////start-commit': Cannot allocate memory [500, #12]
That is an OS error. Subversion is providing you the "Cannot allocate memory"
message as a convenience, it's not producing the error.
Looking at the code I'd bet that fork() is returning ENOMEM on your system.
> Our Linux System Admin had applied different memory cache setting to
> the server but thus far we have no luck resolving this error.
>
> If you could please provide any insights on why and ho we could
> correct this issue, I'm truly appreciated your help/
Add more memory to the system or figure out why the kernel doesn't think it has enough memory. Might want to check your configured ulimits as well.