U/S meeting update Apr 7th 2020
Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
U/S Community meeting
Tuesday Apr 7th
Website help from @tigert https://github.com/submariner-io/submariner-website/issues/72
Continuing work on: https://github.com/orgs/submariner-io/projects/5
Planning 0.3.0 RC1 on Apr 15th
Planning 0.3.0 on Apr 21th
[chris] working on getting the CNCF stuff
[mangelajo] talks about
The possibility of using a LoadBalancer for the UDP IPSEC traffic at some point as an option for deployment, as in some cases (openshift topology) we need to spawn a completely separate worker node/sets of nodes just for submariner to get a public IP.
Chris is worried about latency and other implications depending on how the cloud provider implements this
We agree that this if implemented should be an optional feature.
the status API/structs of the gateway: https://github.com/submariner-io/submariner/pull/485/files
We could potentially add in the future details about latency, packets and bytes transmitted, etc.
That we could reuse those details in the future to push to prometheus. Is prometheus a standard around k8s in general?
[chris] confirms it is at this point quite an standard.
