DxO ViewPoint 3.1.10 Build 276 [x64] Crack | 76.0 MB
Nelson Suggs
The Dual Pixel RAW FunctionBy setting the Dual Pixel RAW function on the camera compatible with the function before shooting RAW images, images are recorded as "special RAW images (Dual Pixel RAW images)" with dual pixel information appended from the imaging sensor. This is called Dual Pixel RAW shooting. Using this function, the [Dual Pixel RAW Optimizer], with Dual Pixel RAW images, you can make use of the Dual Pixel data recorded with the Dual Pixel RAW image for microadjustment of the position of maximum sharpness and resolution using the depth information contained within the file, repositioning the viewpoint or foreground bokeh for a more pleasing result, and reducing the appearance of ghosting in images.IMPORTANTCautions for Dual Pixel RAW shootingNote the following when shooting in Dual Pixel RAW.
- Effects are most easily gained when the lens aperture value is f/5.6 or lower.
- Effects may be different between shooting in vertical orientation and horizontal orientation.
- It is recommended that the ISO speed be ISO 1600 or lower.
Reposition the Viewpoint or Foreground Bokeh for a More Pleasing ResultReposition the viewpoint or foreground bokeh for a more pleasing result, using the dual pixel information recorded in Dual Pixel RAW images.
4. Specify the area to adjust.
- Click the [Select area] and drag on the image to specify the area to be adjusted, and right-click with the mouse to fix the area.
- You can also remove the check mark from the [Show borders] checkbox to hide the border.
Only after I run a query, the memory usage which we see in the task manager for Zulu Platform goes to its maximum allocated memory (16GB) and stays at 16GB. This memory comes down only if the gateway is restarted.
In the Ignition Status Page once the queries are complete, the memory starts going up again and continues to a certain point 10GB to 11GB; drops all the way to around 2 or 3Gb and starts going up again. This is without any queries being run again.
Ok, then 5GB would be too low. The idea is that garbage collecting 8.6GB (11GB => 2.4GB) takes time. If the max limit is lower, GC is going to happen earlier and more often, with a smaller amount collected. Hopefully faster. Java mostly garbage collects just the easiest stuff until memory pressure makes it collect more difficult stuff. (That's the peak of the sawtooth.)
Hello, I've the same problem, the Gateway is not returning the memory to the OS and continues getting more and more until collapses. Reading the explanations in this topic for the sawteeth there is something I don't understand. Regarding to the memory trend, we can see peaks and bottoms with 9 GB of difference between them. My question is, that assuming that if we are in a bottom 9GB of the heap have been removed, afterwards at the peak, from where has been taken another 9GB of memory ? If the memory is not returned to the OS as explained, why don't we just see a flat line at 11GB ?
Java does not return memory to the OS. Ever. That is how it is designed. You configure the RAM Ignition is allowed to use for its heap in ignition.conf. In production, the initial value and maximum value should be the same so that Java gets its allotment immediately.
That allotment should be significantly less than the total in the machine in order to leave RAM for the OS to use, especially for I/O buffers. If installing on a laptop for local development, you must leave a lot of RAM for the OS, your development DB, your graphical desktop, and any designer(s) you might run (which also are java, and use gobs of memory).
If your situation is Ignition using all of its allowed memory, while the OS still has plenty available, then adjust ignition.conf to give it more. You might simply be doing more with Ignition that will fit in its allowance.
For more specific advice, share more specific information. Screen shots of Ignition's performance page and of your OS's memory usage would help. How many tags are defined? How many clients are running? What else is running in the same machine as the gateway?
5a) The memory trend shown in the gateway web interface is Ignition's memory--java's heap. Not the OS's memory. Java's garbage collection technology will reclaim the memory of unused objects on a relaxed pace when there's plenty of heap available, and on a more aggressive pace when there's little free heap. The downward slope on your sawtooth is relaxed reclaim. Note that java isn't giving memory back to the OS when it reclaims, it is just marking it for reuse within java.
5b) I would guess (you haven't shared enough) that your diagnostic view starts something in Ignition, either natively or perhaps a long-running thread of your own, that continues grabbing chunks of data at intervals, and then java's GC slowly reclaims it.
5c) Again, guessing, but you likely have a memory leak that starts with that diagnostic view. In my experience, big memory leaks are almost always inappropriate jython programming. Infinite loops that keep threads in memory are the biggest culprit. Sometimes in events, but often in asynchronous background threads that never end. An audit of your code would be necessary. Perhaps also some java flight recordings.
5a) Understood, I agree that the 8GB are reserved for the heap and never returned to the OS.
5b) Notice that the same diagnostic view in Vision instead of Perspective does not make the Gateway hold memory in the heap. I've tested it. Notice also that, the Perspective session has been closed a long time ago, so nothing launched from a closed Perspecive session is expected to continue executing on the Gateway. If this can happen, how could I detect it (a thread dump or something like that) ? It's possible to determine if a thread opened in a session is running even if the session has been closed?
5c) The view is very simple, there is not much programming there, just the code to bind the query result to a table. Also, I created a very simple view, just with the table and the binding query, with no additional scripts there and the behavior was the same. Guessing, I think that after closing the session, the Gateway recycles the memory, but for any reason, something has been kept alive there that gets memory again.
Vision runs all of its scripting and calculations and property bindings in the Vision Client (local to the user). Perspective runs all of its scripting and calculations and property bindings in the Gateway. Perspective only runs its own javascript in the client browser (and javascript provided in 3rd-party add-on modules for Perspective).
Trend traffic for Vision (along with all other DB results) is transferred as datasets, which, as low-level, column-optimized binary objects, tend to be relatively small both in gateway memory and on the wire to the client. Trend traffic for Perspective has to be converted from dataset form into JSON in the gateway to then transfer to the client browser. Ignition's row-oriented JSON for datasets is anything but efficient, both in the gateway and on the wire to the client.
I'm not sure why your Perspective session isn't cleaning up. All of its code and bindings would have to be reviewed. Note that Perspective depends on timeouts to detect when a browser tab has been closed, as browsers aren't very cooperative (from a webserver's viewpoint) when a user close a tab. If you've set your Perspective session timeout very high, you might see stuff like this. You might want to contact support to look more closely.
Thank you Phil for your detailed explanations. I'd be satisfied if at the end of all of this comments, I could have a final opinion about the reported sawteeth. I mean, if after restart, with all clients and devices connected and shownig the landing page, the Gateway is taken less than 1GB from the heap as you can see in the snapshot. Entering in a situation showing sawteeth toggling between 2GB and 5 GB with the same clients showing the landing page after two days is not normal and something is wrong in the code.
Does that situation always start with opening the diagnostics view? If so, then something in the diagnostics view is doing it. It could be your code. It could be an IA bug in some component that you are using. Anyways, you aren't going to get the answer you want from this forum with the level of detail you've provided. I recommend you ask support to help you if you aren't able to audit the code yourself.
Indeed there is something you missed in the online documentation but I cannot hold it on you, this part of the online documentation is not present in the embedded documentation (thanks for pointing it).
Basic Viewpoints behavior is not guaranteed to be correct if multiple viewpoints are activated at the same time on a diagram. Basic viewpoints modifying extended elements (e.g. modifying Parts color depending on the attached Mass/Price status) there might be concurrent modifications leading to incorrect application of styles extensions. We thus recommend to activate only one viewpoint at a time on a diagram.
- Windows 7 sp1 x64
- Ram upgradable to 16Gb dual channel, ddr3 or 4 don't matter
- CPU with at least 4 phisical cores, and boost with a minimun of 3,0 Ghz and a maximum of 3,9Ghz
- Dedicated GPU like a 1050 or 1060 or something along this level, with at least 3Gb Vram, best would be 4 Gb
- Screen resolution: 1920x1080 maximum, 1280x720 minimum
Do not matter if is used or renewed or a old model, what's matter is the full Win 7 compatibility since i have some very old devices that i want to use, also i need a dedicated gpu for editing video and some light online gaming.
You may also want to investigate whether what you need to do can be done by running Windows 7 in a virtual environment under Windows 10. Further, you'll need to already own a Windows 7 license or ensure whatever used system you buy comes with one -- it's no longer possible to legitimately obtain a new Windows 7 license.
7fc3f7cf58